No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The latest book on metamorphism, Dr. V. Grubenmann's Kristallinen Schiefer, still leaves it an open question what a metamorphic rock is. Generally speaking there is no doubt about the matter; every geologist has a more or less precise idea of what he means by the term, but no one has yet been able to propound a definition which is perfectly satisfactory, and which will enable one to distinguish a metamorphic rock from all other kinds and at the same time convey an expression of the characteristic peculiarities inherent in such a rock. The need of a definition is very necessary. The want of it has led Dr. Grubenmann to include some rocks among the crystalline schists which one ordinarily would not refer to that class, and on the other hand there are some rocks frequently referred to that class which are not included. In the first case, the masses of emery form the twelfth group of Dr. Grubenmann's classification, yet the analysis of the Naxos emery, which reveals traces of boric oxide (1.15 per cent. in one case) would seem to place these lenses among the ore-bodies deposited by pneumatolitic action.
page 359 note 1 Oetling, A., “Vergleichende Experimente über Verfestigung geschmolzener Gesteinmassen unter erhohtem und normalem Druck,”: Tscher. Mitt., xvii, 1898.Google Scholar
page 360 note 1 Riecke, E., “Über das Gleichgewicht zwischen einem festen, homogen deformierten Körper und einer flüssigen Phase, insbesondere über die Depression des Schmelzpunktes duroh Spannung”: Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, iv, p. 278, 1894.Google Scholar
page 360 note 2 Holland, T. H. H., Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xxviii, pt. ii, p. 198, 1900.Google Scholar