No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The following descriptions are based upon a collection of foraminiferal limestones, chiefly nummulitic, from Sinai, which were sent to the British Museum for description and determination by Captain H. G. Lyons, R.E., F.G.S., Director of the Geological Survey of Egypt.
page 308 note 3 The Plates will appear with Part II, in the August Number.
page 308 note 4 “Note on a Geological Reconnaissance made in Arabia Petræa in the Spring of 1868”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxv (1868), p. 38Google Scholar.
page 309 note 1 Mikrogeologie, vol. ii (1854), pl. xxv cGoogle Scholar. Also Parker, & Jones, : Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. ix (1872), p. 289Google Scholar.
page 309 note 2 Aus dem Orient, 1867, pp. 82–4, pl. i, figs. 8a–cGoogle Scholar.
page 309 note 3 See also Lartet, : “Explor. géol. Mer Morte,” 1877, pp. 157–9Google Scholar.
page 309 note 4 Lartet, , “Essai sur la Géol. Palestine,” pt. ii, Paléontologie: Ann. Sci. géol., vol. iii (1872), p. 89, pl. ix, figs. 23, 25, 26Google Scholar.
page 309 note 5 Catal. Foss. Foram. Brit. Mus., 1882, p. 49Google Scholar.
page 309 note 6 Mr. Barron writes (March, 1900) with regard to this deposit: “It has the characters of a beach deposit in that it is gritty and contains well-marked conglomerate beds. There is no doubt, however, that it is part of the Eocene series.”
page 311 note 1 Palæontographica, vol. xxx (1883), Pal. Theil, p. 100, pl. xxv (ii), figs. 4a–iGoogle Scholar.
page 316 note 1 Abhandl. bayer. Akad. Wiss., vol. x (1868), 1870, p. 664, pl. ii, figs. 112a, bGoogle Scholar.