Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:13:39.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding pre- and syn-orogenic tectonic evolution in western Himalaya through age and petrogenesis of Palaeozoic and Cenozoic granites from upper structural levels of Bhagirathi Valley, NW India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2021

Aranya Sen ,
Koushik Sen Open the ORCID record for Koushik Sen [Opens in a new window] ,
Amitava Chatterjee Open the ORCID record for Amitava Chatterjee [Opens in a new window] ,
Shubham Choudhary  and
Alosree Dey
Aranya Sen
Affiliation:
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehradun-248001, India
Koushik Sen*
Affiliation:
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehradun-248001, India Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad-201002, India
Amitava Chatterjee
Affiliation:
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehradun-248001, India Faculty of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Shubham Choudhary
Affiliation:
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehradun-248001, India
Alosree Dey
Affiliation:
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehradun-248001, India Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad-201002, India
*
Author for correspondence: Koushik Sen, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Himalaya is characterized by the presence of both pre-Himalayan Palaeozoic and syn-Himalayan Cenozoic granitic bodies, which can help unravel the pre- to syn-collisional geodynamics of this orogen. In the Bhagirathi Valley of Western Himalaya, such granites and the Tethyan Himalayan Sequence (THS) hosting them are bound to the south by the top-to-the-N extensional Jhala Normal Fault (JNF) and low-grade metapelite of the THS to its north. The THS is intruded by a set of leucocratic dykes concordant to the JNF. Zircon U–Pb laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) geochronology of the THS and one leucocratic dyke reveals that the two rocks have a strikingly similar age distribution, with a common and most prominent age peak at ~1000 Ma. To the north of the THS lies Bhaironghati Granite, a Palaeozoic two-mica granite, which shows a crystallization age of 512.28 ± 1.58 Ma. Our geochemical analysis indicates that it is a product of pre-Himalayan Palaeozoic magmatism owing to extensional tectonics in a back-arc or rift setting following the assembly of Gondwana (500–530 Ma). The Cenozoic Gangotri Leucogranite lies to the north of Bhaironghati Granite, and U–Pb dating of zircon from this leucogranite gives a crystallization age of 21.73 ± 0.11 Ma. Our geochemical studies suggest that the Gangotri Leucogranite is a product of muscovite-dehydration melting of the lower crust owing to flexural bending in relation to steepening of the subducted Indian plate. The leucocratic dykes are highly refracted parts of the Gangotri Leucogranite that migrated and emplaced along extensional fault zones related to the JNF and scavenged zircon from the host THS during crystallization.

Keywords

leucogranitesmagmatismgranitezirconPalaeozoicCenozoic
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 159 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 97 - 123
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auden, JB (1949) Tehri Garhwal and British Garhwal. Recordings of the Geological Survey of India 76, 74–8.Google Scholar
Bea, F (2012) The sources of energy for crustal melting and the geochemistry of heat-producing elements. Lithos 153, 278–91. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, WV (1984) Geochemistry of rare earth elements: mateorite studies. In Rare Earth Element Geochemistry (ed. Henderson, P), pp. 63–114. New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, H, Huang, Y, Li, G, Zhang, L, Wu, J, Dong, L, Dai, Z and Lu, L (2018) Late Triassic sedimentary records in the northern Tethyan Himalaya: tectonic link with Greater India. Geoscience Frontiers 9, 273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carosi, R, Lombardo, B, Molli, G, Musumeci, G and Pertusati, PC (1998) The south Tibetan detachment system in the Rongbuk valley, Everest region: deformation features and geological implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 16, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catlos, EJ, Perez, TJ, Lovera, OM, Dubey, CS, Schmitt, AK and Etzel, TM (2020) High-Resolution P-T-Time Paths across Himalayan faults exposed along the Bhagirathi Transect NW India: implications for the construction of the Himalayan Orogen and ongoing deformation. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 21, e2020GC009353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawood, PA, Johnson, MRW and Nemchin, AA (2007) Early Paleozoic orogenesis along the Indian margin of Gondwana: tectonic response to Gondwana assembly. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 255, 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Z, Vervoort, JD, McClelland, WC and Knaack, C (2006) U-Pb zircon dating by LA-ICP-MS. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 7, Q05009. doi: 10.1029/2005GC001100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, DB, McDonald, MA, Reynold, PH and Longstaffe, FJ (1993) Leucogranites in the Lachlan fold belt. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 83, 1–26.Google Scholar
Clemens, JD and Vielzeuf, D (1987) Constraints on magma melting and production in the crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 86, 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, C, Grujic, DE, Hollister, LS and Schmid, SM (1997) Metamorphic reactions related to decompression and synkinematic intrusion of leucogranite, High Himalayan Crystallines, Bhutan. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 15, 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhiman, R and Singh, S (2020) Neoproterozoic and Cambro-Ordovician magmatism: episodic growth and reworking of continental crust, Himachal Himalaya, India. International Geology Review 63.doi: 10.1080/00206814.2020.1716399.Google Scholar
El Bouseily, AM and El Sokkary, AA (1975) The relation between Rb, Ba and Sr in granitic rocks. Chemical Geology 16, 207–19. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(75)90029-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, BR, Barnes, CG, Collins, WJ, Arculus, RJ, Ellis, DJ and Frost, CD (2001) A geochemical classification for granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology 42, 2033–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gansser, A (1964) Geology of the Himalayas. London: Interscience, 289 pp.Google Scholar
Garzanti, E, Casnedi, R and Jadoul, F (1986) Sedimentary evidence of a Cambro-Ordovician orogenic event in the Northwestern Himalaya. Sedimentary Geology 48, 237–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrels, GE, DeCelles, PG, Martin, A, Ojha, TP, Pinhassi, G and Upreti, BN (2003) Initiation of the Himalayan orogen as an early Paleozoic thin-skinned thrust belt. GSA Today 13, 4–9.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrels, GE, DeCelles, PG, Ojha, TP and Upreti, BN (2006a) Geological and U–Pb geo- chronologic evidence for early Paleozoic tectonism in the Dadeldhura thrust sheet, far-west Nepal Himalaya. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 28, 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrels, GE, DeCelles, PG, Ojha, TP and Upreti, BN (2006b) Geologic and U–Th–Pb geo- chronologic evidence for early Paleozoic tectonism in the Kathmandu thrust sheet, central Nepal Himalaya. Geological Society of American Bulletin 118, 185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrels, GE, Kapp, P, DeCelles, PJ, Pullen, A, Blakey, R, Weislogel, A, Ding, L, Guynn, J, Martin, A, McQuarrie, N and Yin, A (2011) Detrital zircon geochronology of pre-Tertiary strata in the Tibetan-Himalayan orogen. Tectonics 30, TC5016. doi: 10.1029/2011TC002868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrels, GE, Valencia, V and Ruiz, J (2008) Enhanced precision, accuracy, efficiency, and spatial resolution of U-Pb ages by laser ablation-multicollector-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 9, Q03017. doi: 10.1029/2007GC001805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gou, Z, Zhang, Z, Dong, X, Xiang, H, Ding, H, Tian, Z and Lei, H (2016) Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of the Yadong leucogranites, southern Himalaya. Lithos 256–257, 300–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groppo, C, Rolfo, F and Indares, A (2013) Partial melting in the Higher Himalayan Crystallines of Eastern Nepal: the effect of decompression and implications for the ‘Channel Flow’ model. Journal of Petrology 53, 1057–88. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egs009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillot, S and Le Fort, P (1995) Geochemical constraints on the bimodal nature of the High Himalayan leucogranites. Lithos 35, 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Z and Wilson, M (2012) The Himalayan leucogranites: constraints on the nature of their crustal source origin and geodynamic setting. Gondwana Research 22, 360–76. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, N and Massey, J (1994) Decompression and anatexis of Himalayan metapelites. Tectonics 13, 1537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, TM, Grove, M, McKeegan, KD, Coath, CD, Lovera, OM and Le Fort, P (1999) Origin and episodic emplacement of the Manaslu intrusive complex, central Himalaya. Journal of Petrology 40, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, TM, Lovera, OM and Grove, M (1997) New insights into the origin of two contrasting Himalayan granite belts. Geology 25, 899–902.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, A and Gansser, A (1939) Central Himalayas: geological observations of the Swiss Expedition in 1936. Mémoires de la Société Helvétique des Sciences Naturelles 73, 1–245.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, TN, Harris, NW, Warren, CJ, Spencer, CJ, Roberts, NMW, Horstwood, MSA and Parrish, RR (2017) The identification and significance of pure sediment-derived granites. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 467, 57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstwood, MSA, Kosler, J, Gehrels, G, Jackson, SE, McLean, NM, Paton, C, Pearson, NJ, Sircombe, K, Sylvester, P, Vermeesch, P, Bowring, JF, Condon, DJ and Schoene, B (2016) Community-derived standards for LA-ICPMS U-(Th)-Pb geochronology: uncertainty propagation, age interpretation and data reporting. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 40, 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, F, Lee, J, Hacker, B, Bowman-Kamaha’o, M and Cosca, M (2015) Himalayan gneiss dome formation in the middle crust and exhumation by normal faulting: new geochronology of Gianbul dome, northwestern India. Geological Society of America Bulletin 127, 162–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inger, S and Harris, N (1993) Geochemical constraints on leucogranite magmatism in the Langtang Valley, Nepal Himalaya. Journal of Petrology 34, 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J, Harris, N, Argles, T, Parrish, R and Zhang, H (2011) Contribution of crustal anatexis to the tectonic evolution of Indian crust beneath Tibet. Geological Society of America Bulletin 123, 218–39. doi: 10.1130/B30085.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Fort, P (1975) Himalaya: the collided range. Present knowledge of the continental arc. American Journal of Science 275A, 1–44.Google Scholar
Le Fort, P (1986) Metamorphism and magmatism during the Himalayan collision. In Collision Tectonics (eds Coward, MP and Ries, AC), pp. 159–72. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 19.Google Scholar
Le Fort, P, Cuney, M, Deniel, C, France-Lanord, C, Sheppard, SMF, Upreti, BN and Vidal, P (1987) Crustal generation of the Himalayan leucogranites. Tectonophysics 134, 39–57. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(87)90248-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J, Hacker, BR, Dinklage, WS, Wang, Y, Gans, P, Calvert, A, Wan, J-L, Chen, W, Blythe, AE and McClelland, W (2000) Evolution of the Kangmar Dome, southern Tibet: structural, petrologic, and thermochronologic constraints. Tectonics 19, 872–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J, Hacker, BR and Wang, Y (2004) Evolution of North Himalayan Gneiss Domes: structural and metamorphic studies in Mabja Dome, southern Tibet. Journal of Structural Geology 26, 2297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J, McClelland, W, Wang, Y, Blythe, A and McWilliams, M (2006) Oligocene-Miocene middle crustal flow in southern Tibet: geochronology of Mabja Dome. In Channel Flow, Ductile Extrusion and Exhumation in Continental Collision Zones (ed. Law, RD), pp. 445–69. Geological Society, of London, Special Publication no. 268.Google Scholar
Lucas-Tooth, HJ and Pyne, C (1964) The accurate determination of major constituents by X-ray fluorescence analysis in the presence of large inter-element effects. Advances in X-Ray Analysis 7, 523–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manickavasagam, RM, Jain, AK, Singh, S, Asokan, A, Macfarlane, A, Sorkhabi, R and Quade, J (1999) Metamorphic evolution of the northwest Himalaya, India: pressure, temperature data, inverted metamorphism, and exhumation in the Kashmir, Himachal, and Garhwal Himalayas. Geological Society of America Special Paper 328, 179–98.Google Scholar
Meert, JG and van der Voo, R (1997) The assembly of Gondwana 800–550 Ma. Journal of Geodynamics 23, 223–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, RP (1993) Pressure, temperature and time constraints on metamorphism across the Main Central Thrust zone and High Himalayan Slab in the Garhwal Himalaya. In Himalayan Tectonics (eds Treloar, PJ and Searle, MP), pp. 485–509. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no.74.Google Scholar
Miller, C, Thöni, M, Frank, W, Grasemann, B, Klötzli, U, Guntli, P and Draganits, E (2001) The early Paleozoic magmatic event in the Northwest Himalaya, India: source, tectonic setting and age of emplacement. Geological Magazine 138, 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montemagni, C, Carosi, R, Fusi, N, Iaccarino, S, Montomol, C, Villa, IM and Zanchetta, S (2020) Three-dimensional vorticity and time constrained evolution of the Main Central Thrust zone, Garhwal Himalaya (NW India). Terra Nova 32, 215–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patiño Douce, AE (1997) Generation of peraluminous A-type granites by low-pressure melting of calc-alkine granitoids. Geology 25, 743–66.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patiño Douce, AE and Harris, N (1998) Experimental constraints on Himalayan anatexis. Journal of Petrology 39, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patiño Douce, AE and McCarthy, TC (1998) Melting of crustal rocks during continental collision and subduction. In When Continents Collide: Geodynamics and Geochemistry of Ultrahigh-Pressure Rocks: Petrology and Structural Geology, v. 10 (eds Hacker, BR and Liou, JG), 27–55. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9050-1_2.Google Scholar
Paton, C, Hellstrom, J, Paul, B, Woodhead, B and Hergt, J (2011) Iolite: freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 26, 2508–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, JA, Harris, NB and Tindle, AG (1984). Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of petrology, 25(4), 956–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pêcher, A (1991) The contact between the Higher Himalayan Crystallines and the Tibetan sedimentary series: Miocene large-scale dextral shearing. Tectonics 10, 587–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pêcher, A and Scaillet, B (1989) La structure du Haut-Himalaya au Garhwal (Indes). Eclogae Geologicae Helevetiae 82, 655–68.Google Scholar
Phukon, P, Sen, K, Singh, PC, Sen, A, Srivastava, HB and Singhal, S (2019) Characterizing anatexis in the Greater Himalayan Sequence (Kumaun, NW India) in terms of pressure, temperature, time and deformation. Lithos 344, 22–50. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.04.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, M, Liangjun, Y, Xiaohan, L, Wilson, CJL, Sandiford, M and Phillips, D (2006) 40Ar/39Ar thermo-chronology of the Kampa dome, southern Tibet: implications for tectonic evolution of the North Himalayan gneiss domes. Tectonophysics 421, 268–97. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, CL, Berger, A and Schmid, SM (1995) Observations from the floor of a granitoid pluton: inferences on the driving force of final emplacement. Geology 23, 443–6.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaillet, B, Dardel, J and Le Fort, P (1988) A PêcherLes leucogranites de Gangotri (Himalaya du Garhwal), Résultats préliminairesRéu. Sci. Terre, 12th, p. 120(Lille).Google Scholar
Scaillet, B, France-Lanord, C and Le Fort, P (1990) Badrinath-Gangotri plutons (Garhwal, India): petrological and geochemical evidence for fractionation processes in a High Himalayan Leucogranite. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 44, 163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaillet, B, Holtz, F, Pichavant, M and Schmidt, M (1996) Viscosity of Himalayan leucogranites: implications for mechanisms of granitic magma ascent. Journal of Geophysical Research 101, 27,691–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaillet, B, Pêcher, A, Rochette, P and Champenois, M (1995) The Gangotri granite (Garhwal Himalaya): laccolithic emplacement in an extending collisional belt. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 100, 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, MP (1999) Emplacement of Himalayan leucogranites by magma injection along giant sill complexes: examples from the Cho Oyu, Gyachung Kang and Everest leucogranites (Nepal Himalaya). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 17, 773–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, K, Chaudhury, R and Pfänder, J (2015) 40Ar-39Ar age constraint on deformation and brittle-ductile transition of the Main Central Thrust and South Tibetan Detachment Zone from Dhauliganga valley, Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Geodynamics 88. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2015.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shand, SJ (1943) The Eruptive Rocks, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Singh, S (2003) Himalayan Granitoids. Journal of the Virtual Explorer 11, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S (2018) Protracted zircon growth in migmatites and in-situ melt of Higher Himalayan Crystalline: U-Pb ages from Bhagirathi Valley, NW Himalaya, India. Geoscience Frontiers. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.12.014.Google Scholar
Singh, S, Mukherjee, PK, Jain, AK, Khanna, PP, Sain, NK and Kumar, R (2003) Source characterization and possible emplacement mechanism of collision-related Gangotri Leucogranite along Bhagirathi Valley, NW-Himalaya. Journal of the Virtual Explorer 11, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sláma, J, Kosler, J, Condon, DJ, Crowley, JL, Gerdes, A, Hanchar, JM, Horstwood, MSA, Morris, GA, Nasdala, L, Norberg, N, Schaltegger, U, Schoene, B, Tubrett, MN and Whitehouse, MJ (2008) Plešovice zircon: a new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic analysis. Chemical Geology 249, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorkhabi, RB, Stump, E, Foland, KA and Jain, AK (1999) Tectonic and cooling history of the Garhwal High Himalaya (Bhagirathi Valley): constraining from thermochronological data. In Geodynamics of the NW Himalaya (eds. Jain, AK and Manickavasgam, RM), pp. 217–35. Gondwana Research Group Memoirs 6.Google Scholar
Spencer, CJ, Kirkland, CL and Taylor, RJM (2016) Strategies towards statistically robust interpretations of in-situ U-Pb zircon geochronology. Geoscience Frontiers 7, 581–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, CR, Kligfield, R, Schelling, D, Fruta, K and Virdi, NS (1989) The Bhagirathi leucogranite of the High Himalaya: age, petrogenesis, and tectonic implications. Geological Society of America Special Paper 232, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, SR and McLennan, SM (1985) The Continental Crust, Its Composition and Evolution: An Examination of the Geochemical Record Preserved in Sedimentary Rocks. Oxford: Blackwell, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Tripathi, K, Sen, K and Dubey, AK (2012) Modification of fabric in pre-Himalayan granitic rocks by post-emplacement ductile deformation: insights from microstructures, AMS and U-Pb geochronology of the Paleozoic Kinnaur Kailash Granite and associated Cenozoic leucogranites of the South Tibetan Detachment Zone, Himachal High Himalaya. International Journal of Earth Science 101, 761–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdiya, KS (1995) Proterozoic sedimentation and Pan-African geodynamic development in the Himalaya, the northern frontier of east Gondwanaland. Gondwana Research 1, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeesch, P (2018) IsoplotR: a free and open toolbox for geochronology. Geoscience Frontiers 9, 1479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigneresse, JL, Tikoff, B and Améglio, L (1999) Modification of the regional stress field by magma intrusion and formation of tabular granitic plutons. Tectonophysics 302, 203–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villaseca, C, Martín Romera, C, De la Rosa, J and Barbero, L (2003) Residence and redistribution of REE, Y, Zr, Th and U during granulite-facies metamorphism: behaviour of accessory and major phases in peraluminous granulites of central Spain. Chemical Geology 200, 293–323. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2541(03)00200-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visonà, D, Carosi, R, Montomoli, C, Tiepolo, M and Peruzzo, L (2012) Miocene andalusite leucogranite in central-east Himalaya (Everest–Masang Kang area): low-pressure melting during heating. Lithos 144, 194–208. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visonà, D and Lombardo, B (2002) Two-mica and tourmaline leucogranites from the Everest- Makalu region (Nepal-Tibet): Himalayan leucogranite genesis by isobaric heating? Lithos 62, 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visonà, D, Rubatto, D and Villa, IM (2010) The mafic rocks of Shao La (Kharta, S. Tibet): Ordovician basaltic magmatism in the greater Himalayan crystallines of central eastern Himalaya. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 38, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X, Zhang, J, Santosh, M, Liu, J, Yan, S and Guo, L (2012) Andean-type orogeny in the Himalayas of south Tibet: implications for early Paleozoic tectonics along the Indian margin of Gondwana. Lithos 154, 248–62. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, R, (2016) Himalayan leucogranites and migmatites: nature, timing and duration of anatexis. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 34, 821–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedenbeck, M, Alle, P, Corfu, F, Griffin, WL, Meier, M, Oberli, F, von Quadt, A, Roddick, JC and Spiegel, W (1995) Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses. Geostandard Newsletters 19, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, ZQ, Yang, JS, Qi, XX, Cui, JW, Li, HB and Chen, FY (2006) India–Asia collision: a further discussion of N–S- and E–W-trending detachments and the orogenic mechanism of the modern Himalayas. Geological Bulletin of China 25, 1–14 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yakymchuk, C and Brown, M (2019) Divergent behaviour of Th and U during anatexis: implications for the thermal evolution of orogenic crust. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 37, 899–916. doi: 10.1111/jmg.12469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakymchuk, C, Kirkland, CL and Clark, C (2018) Th/U ratios in metamorphic zircon. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 36, 715–37. doi: 10.1111/jmg.12307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, A (2006) Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogeny as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history and foreland sedimentation. Earth Science Reviews 76, 1–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, HF, Harris, N, Parrish, R, Kelley, S, Zhang, L, Rogers, N, Argles, T and King, J (2004) Causes and consequences of protracted melting of the mid-crust exposed in the North Himalayan antiform. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 228, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, HF, Harris, N, Parrish, R, Zhang, L, Zhao, ZD and Li, DW (2005) Geochemistry of North Himalayan leucogranites: regional comparison, petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Earth Science Journal of China University of Geosciences 30, 275–88 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhu, DC, Zhao, ZD, Niu, YL, Dilek, Y and Mo, XX (2011) Lhasa terrane in southern Tibet came from Australia. Geology 39, 727–30. doi: 10.1130/G31895.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, DC, Zhao, ZD, Niu, YL, Dilek, Y, Wang, Q, Ji, WH, Dong, GC, Sui, QL, Liu, YS, Yuan, HL and Mo, XX (2012) Cambrian bimodal volcanism in the Lhasa Terrane, southern Tibet: record of an early Paleozoic Andean-type magmatic arc in the Australian proto-Tethyan margin. Chemical Geology 328, 290–308. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.12.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sen et al. supplementary material

Sen et al. supplementary material

Download Sen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 38.9 KB