Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:53:37.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Two Monzonitic Series of the Newry Complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Doris L. Reynolds
Doris L. Reynolds
Affiliation:
The University, Durham.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a study of the rocks of the eastern end of the Newry Complex, the writer distinguished two contrasted groups of hybrid rocks— (i) the Slievegarron type, and (ii) the Seeconnell type—both of which are intimately associated with biotite-pyroxenite and biotite-peridotite. The Slievegarron hybrids comprise an augite-biotite-diorite series. The typical augite-biotite-diorite (1934, p. 611) is a highly undersaturated rock heteromorphous with certain varieties of orthoclase-basalt and leucite-basanite; it might equally well be described as biotite-essexite-gabbro. No further discussion of these rocks will be undertaken in this paper, but it seems desirable to point out that they should not be confused—as unfortunately they have been—with gabbro-diorite.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 73 , Issue 8 , August 1936 , pp. 337 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 337 note 1 Reynolds, D. L., “The Eastern End of the Newry Igneous Complex,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1934, 90, 585–636. Further references to this paper are made by year and pages only.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 341 note 1 Sederholm, J. J., Bull. Geol. Comm. Finlande, 48, 1916.Google Scholar

page 341 note 2 Bailey, E. B., “Memorandum” re. Newry Igneous Complex, GEOL. MAG., LXXIII, 1936, 270.Google Scholar

page 342 note 1 Gillson, J. L., U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 158 D, 1929, 80.Google Scholar

page 342 note 2 In case the implication of this statement is not clear, it should be emphasized that the augite-biotite-diorite is not a later intrusion, but is gradational to the biotite-pyroxenite—monzonite and biotite-peridotite—monzonite series.Google Scholar

page 342 note 3 MacGregor, A. G., Min. Mag., 22, 1931, 524–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 346 note 1 Shouten, C., Econ. Geol., 29, 1934, 611–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 346 note 2 Gillson, J. L., and Kania, J. E. A.. Econ. Geol., 25, 1930, 511 et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 347 note 1 ibid.Gilluly, and. U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 175 C, 1933. See also C. S. Ross 1935. 179

page 348 note 1 Johannsen, A., A Descriptive Petrography of the Igneous Rocks, ii, 1932, 43.Google Scholar

page 348 note 2 von Eckermann, H., Geol. För. Förh., Stockholm, 44, 1922, 309.Google Scholar

page 348 note 3 Eskola, P., Bull. Geol. Comm. Finlande, 40, 1914, 219.Google Scholar

page 352 note 1 Read, H. H., Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland (Strath Oykell and Lower Loch Shin), 1926, pp. 154–166.Google Scholar

page 353 note 1 Phemister, J., Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland (Strath Oykell and Lower Loch Shin), 1926, pp. 22–111.Google Scholar

page 353 note 2 Peacock, M. A., Journ. Geol., 39, 1931, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 353 note 3 Pirsson, L. V., U.S.G.S. Bull., 237, 1905.Google Scholar

page 353 note 4 Pirsson, L. V., U.S.G.S. 12th Ann. Rep., Part iii.Google Scholar

page 353 note 5 Daly, R. A., Geol. Surv. Canada Mem. 38, 1912, Part i. For the analysis of the biotite-pyroxenite see D. L. Reynolds, Min. Pet. Mitt., 46, 1935, p. 450, Analysis No. 5.Google Scholar

page 355 note 1 Sederholm, J. J., Bull. Géol. Comm. Finlande, 77, 1926, 135.Google Scholar

page 356 note 1 Quirke, T. T., Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 38, 1927, 762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 356 note 2 Sederholm, J. J., Bull. Géol. Comm. Finlande, 11, 1926, 28.Google Scholar

page 357 note 1 Sederholm, J. J., Bull Géol. Comm. Finlande, 58, 1923, 128.Google Scholar

page 357 note 2 Wegmann, C. E., Geol. Rundschau, 26, 1935, 327 and 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 359 note 1 Fenner, C. N., “ Pneumatolytic Processes in the Formation of Minerals and Ores, ” in Ore Deposits of the Western States, Lindgren Volume, 1933, 80 81.Google Scholar

page 360 note 1 Quirke, T. T., and Collins, W. H., Geol. Surv. Canada Mem., 160, 1930, 54–5.Google Scholar

page 360 note 2 Reynolds, D. L., Min. Pet. Mitt., 46, 1935, 460.Google Scholar