Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:56:47.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Study of the Contorted Drift and Disturbed Chalk at Weybourne, North Norfolk.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

P. H. Banham  and
C. E. Ranson
P. H. Banham
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bedford College, Regent's Park, N.W. 1.
C. E. Ranson
Affiliation:
Hitchin Boys' Grammar School, Hitchin, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A structural analysis of the cliffs and one pit section in Pleistocene deposits at Weybourne has shown one major phase of ice movement only. Ice moving from approximately 210 degrees caused the disturbance of the upper part of the Chalk (together with the overlying Weybourne Crag) and the deformation and deposition of a chalky-boulder-clay, thought to be equivalent to the Lowestoft till.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 102 , Issue 2 , April 1965 , pp. 164 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baden-Powell, D. F. W., 1948. The Chalky Boulder Clays of Norfolk and Suffolk. Geol. Mag., 85, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, T. G., 1906. The Chalk Bluff at Trimingham. Geol. Mag., 43, 400–5 and 560–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, T. G., and Hill, E., 1912. The end of the Trimingham Chalk Bluff. Geol. Mag., 49, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, P. G. H., and Slater, G., 1923. Whitsuntide excursion to the Cromer and Norwich districts. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 34, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brydone, R. M., 1906. On the Trimmingham Chalk. Geol. Mag., 43, 13–17 and 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, R. G., 1953. Glacial drifts and the Undermelt Theory. Harold Hill and Son, Ltd. 42 pp.Google Scholar
Donner, J. J., and West, R. G., 1957. The Quaternary geology of Brageneset, Nordaustlandet, Spitsbergen. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, 109, 37 pp.Google Scholar
Glen, J. W., Donner, J. J., and West, R. G., 1957. On the mechanisms by which stones in tills become oriented. Amer. J. Sci., 255, 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollin, J. T., and Cameron, R. L., 1961. I.G.Y. Glaciological work at Wilke's Station, Antarctica. Journ. Glac., 3, 833–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, H. H., 1907. North Norfolk geology; the Chalk and its Dislocations. Geol. Mag., 44, 268–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SirLyell, C., 1840. On the Boulder Formation. Phil. Mag., 3, 16, 345–362.Google Scholar
Peake, N. B., and Hancock, J. M., 1961. The Upper Cretaceous of Norfolk. Trans. Norfolk and Norwich Nat. Soc., 19, 293–339.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. G., 1962. The geometry of conjugate fold systems. Geol. Mag., 99, 516–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, D. M., and Sturt, B. A., 1963. A study of fold styles and symmetry relationships on Söröyen, N. Norway. Norsk. geol. tiddskr, 43, 4.Google Scholar
Reid, C., 1882. The geology of the country around Cromer. Mem. Geol. Surv. E. and W.Google Scholar
Solomon, J. D., 1932. The glacial succession of the N. Norfolk coast. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 43, 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straw, A., 1960. The limit of the last glaciation in N. Norfolk. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 71, 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R. G., and Donner, J. J., 1956. The glaciations of East Anglia and the East Midlands: a differentiation based on stone orientation measurements of the tills. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 112, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, H. B., 1881. The geology of the country around Norwich. Mem. Geol. Surv. E. and W.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. B., 1884. The geology of the country around Fakenham, Wells, and Holt. Mem. Geol. Surv. E. and W.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. B., 1903. On some disturbances in the chalk at Royston (Hertfordshire). Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 59, 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar