Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:41:19.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Significance of the punctation mosaic of the Jurassic thecidellinid brachiopod Moorellina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

P. G. Baker
P. G. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Derby and District College of Technology, Kedleston Road, Derby, DE3 1GB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Study of the punctation mosaics of Moorellina granulosa (Moore) and Moorellina ornata (Davidson), revealed by serial sectioning and stereoscan photomicrographs, shows that the apparent random distribution of punctae may be reconciled to two superimposed regular insertion patterns. Careful plotting of the endopunctae of M. granulosa from serial, cellulose acetate peels, reveals the presence of impersistent punctae. A new model is proposed, based on superimposed insertion patterns and offering an explanation for impersistence of punctae.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , March 1970 , pp. 105 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, P.G. 1970. The growth and shell microstructure of the thecideacean brachiopod Moorellina granulosa (Moore) from the Middle Jurassic of England. J alaeontology 13, 76–99.Google Scholar
Cowen, R. 1966. The distribution of punctae on the brachiopod shell. Geol. Mag. 103, 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haro, A. 1960. Sobre el anatomia del manto en Terebratulina caput-serpentis (Brachiopoda Testicardinia). Publnes. Inst. Biol. apl., Barcelona, 31, 101–112.Google Scholar
Elliott, G.F. 1953. The classification of the thecidean brachiopods. Ann. Mag. Nat, Hist. (12) 6, 693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G.F. 1955. Shell-structure of thecidean brachiopods. Nature, Lond. 175, 1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemezys, K.J. 1965. Significance of punctae and pustules in brachiopods. Geol. Mag. 102, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. & Williams, A. 1969. The caecum of articulate Brachiopoda. Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 172, 187–201.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1956. The calcareous shell of the Brachiopoda and its importance to their classification. Biol. Rev. 31, 243–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. 1965. p.H64–84 in Moore, R.C. (Ed): Treatise on Invertebrate Palecontology, part (H) Brachiopoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1966. Growth and structure of the shell of living articulate brachiopods. Nature, Lond. 211, 1146–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. 1968a. Evolution of the shell structure of articulate brachiopods. Special Papers in Palaeontology 2, 55 p. Palaeontological Association, London.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1968 b. A history of skeletal secretion among articulate brachiopods. Lethaia, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo 1, 268–287.Google Scholar
Williams, A. & Rowell, A.J. 1965. Morphology. p.H57–H155 in Moore, R.C. (Ed.): Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, part (H), Brachiopoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar