Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:46:46.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pseudagnostus rugosus Ergaliev, 1980: a key agnostoid species for intercontinental correlation of upper Furongian (Cambrian) strata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

FREDRIK TERFELT  and
PER AHLBERG
FREDRIK TERFELT*
Affiliation:
Fredrik Terfelt, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Geological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5–7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
PER AHLBERG
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pseudagnostus rugosus Ergaliev, 1980 is described from the Furongian Ctenopyge tumida Zone at Gislövshammar, Scania, southern Sweden. This is the first record of this distinctive agnostoid in Scandinavia. The species is known previously from Malyi Karatau, Kazakhstan, and northwestern Hunan and western Zhejiang, South China, and provides a newly recognized link between middle–upper Furongian successions in Baltica, Kazakhstan and South China. The occurrences of P. rugosus allow a correlation between the C. tumida Zone of Baltica, the lower Eolotagnostus scrobicularis–Jegorovaia Zone of Kazakhstan and the lower Lotagnostus americanus Zone of South China.

Keywords

agnostoidsPseudagnostuscorrelationbiostratigraphyFurongianSweden
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 147 , Issue 5 , September 2010 , pp. 789 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlberg, P. 2003. Trilobites and intercontinental tie points in the Upper Cambrian of Scandinavia. Geologica Acta 1, 127–34.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P. & Ahlgren, J. 1996. Agnostids from the Upper Cambrian of Västergötland, Sweden. GFF 118, 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlberg, P., Axheimer, N., Babcock, L. E., Eriksson, M. E., Schmitz, B. & Terfelt, F. 2009. Cambrian high-resolution biostratigraphy and carbon isotope chemostratigraphy in Scania, Sweden: first record of the SPICE and DICE excursions in Scandinavia. Lethaia 42, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelin, N. P. 1851. Palaeontologia Svecica. I: Iconographia crustaceorum formationis transitionis. Fasc. 1. Lund, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E. & Peng, S. C. 2007. Cambrian chronostratigraphy: Current state and future plans. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 254, 62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Peng, S. C., Geyer, G. & Shergold, J. H. 2005. Changing perspectives on Cambrian chronostratigraphy and progress toward subdivision of the Cambrian System. Geosciences Journal 9, 101–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belt, T. 1867. On some new trilobites from the Upper Cambrian rocks of North Wales. Geological Magazine 4, 294–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E. 1860. On some new species of fossils from the limestone near Point Levi, opposite Quebec. Canadian Naturalist and Geologist 5, 301–24.Google Scholar
Boeck, C. 1838. Uebersicht der bisher in Norwegen gefundenen Formen der Trilobiten. In Gaea Norvegica (ed. Keilhau, B. M.), pp. 138–45. Christiania (Oslo): Johan Dahl.Google Scholar
Borovikov, L. I. & Kryskov, L. N. 1963. Cambrian deposits of the Kendyktas Mountains (southern Kazakhstan). National Geological Committee of the U.S.S.R., Transactions of the All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Geology (VSEGEI), New Series 94, 266–80 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Chien (Qian), Y. Y. 1961. Cambrian trilobites from Sandu and Duyun, southern Kweichou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 9, 91–129 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Choi, D. K. & Kim, E. Y. 2006. Occurrence of Changshania (Trilobita, Cambrian) in the Taebaeksan Basin, Korea and its stratigraphic and paleogeographic significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 242, 343–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, D. K., Lee, J. H. & Sheen, B. C. 2004. Upper Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from the Machari Formation, Yongwol, Korea. Geobios 37, 159–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergaliev, G. K. 1980. Middle and Upper Cambrian trilobites of the Lesser Karatau. Alma-Ata: Academy of Sciences, Kazakhstan SSR, Kazakhstan SSR Publishing House, 211 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Ergaliev, G. K. & Ergaliev, F. G. 2008. Middle and Upper Cambrian Agnostida of the Aksai National Geological Reserve South Kazakhstan (Kyrshabakty River, Malyi Karatau Range). Almaty: Gylum, 376 pp. (in Russian with English abstract, introduction and figure captions).Google Scholar
Ergaliev, G. K., Zhemchuzhnikov, V. A., Ergaliev, F. G., Popov, L. E., Pour, M. G. & Bassett, M. G. 2008. Trilobite biostratigraphy and biodiversity patterns through the Middle-Upper Cambrian transition in the Kyrshbakty section, Malyi Karatau, southern Kazakhstan. In Advances in Trilobite Research (eds Rábano, I., Gozalo, R. & García-Bellido, D.), pp. 91–8. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero 9. Madrid: Instituto Geólogico y Minero de España.Google Scholar
Ergaliev, G. K., Zhemchuzhnikov, V. A., Popov, L. E., Bassett, M. G., Nikitina, O. I., Dubinina, S. V., Ergaliev, F. G. & Fazylov, E. M. (eds) 2009. Field excursion guide. 14th International Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, Malyi Karatau Range, southern Kazakhstan. Almaty – Karatau, 24 August – 2 September 2009. 37 pp.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M. E. & Terfelt, F. 2007. Anomalous facies and ancient faeces in the latest middle Cambrian of Sweden. Lethaia 40, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. & Shergold, J. 2000. The quest for internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes 23, 188–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1957. The trilobite family Olenidae with description of Norwegian material and remarks on the Olenid and Tremadocian Series. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps–Akademi i Oslo, I. Matematisk–Naturvidenskapelig Klasse 1957 (1), 1–303.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1909. Über die Agnostiden. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 61, 380–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaesler, R. L. (ed.) 1997. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part O. Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, Revised. Volume 1: Introduction, Order Agnostida, Order Redlichiida. Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, 530 pp.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1937. The Cambro-Ordovician shelly faunas of South America. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, section 4 4, 369–522.Google Scholar
Lazarenko, N. P., Gogin, I. Ya., Pegel, T. V., Sukhov, S. S., Abaimova, G. P., Egorova, L. I., Fedorov, A. B., Raevskaya, E. G. & Ushatinskaya, G. T. 2008. Excursion 1b. Cambrian stratigraphy of the northeastern Siberian Platform and potential stratotypes of lower boundaries of the proposed Upper Cambrian Chekurovkian and Nelegerian stages in the Ogon'or Formation section at the Khos-Nelege River; the boundaries are defined by the FAD of Agnostotes orientalis and Lotagnostus americanus. In The Cambrian System of the Siberian Platform. Part 2: North-east of the Siberian Platform (eds Rozanov, A. Yu. & Varlamov, A. I.), pp. 61–139. Moscow and Novosibirsk: PIN RAS, 139 pp.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H. & Lin, H. L. 1983. Uppermost Cambrian and lowermost Ordovician trilobites of Jiangshan-Changshan area. In Papers for the Symposium on the Cambrian-Ordovician and Ordovician-Silurian boundaries, Nanjing, China, October 1983 (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology), pp. 6–11. Nanjing: Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, 179 pp.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H. & Lin, H. L. 1984. Late late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites of Jiangshan–Changshan area, Zhejiang. In Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Systemic Boundaries in China, Cambrian-Ordovician Boundary (1) (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology), pp. 45–143. Hefei: Anhui Science and Technology Publishing House, 405 pp.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H. & Lin, H. L. 1989. The Cambrian trilobites of western Zhejiang. Palaeontologia Sinica, Whole Number 178, New Series B25, 1–287. (in Chinese and English).Google Scholar
Martin, F. & Dean, W. T. 1988. Middle and Upper Cambrian acritarchs and trilobite zonation at Manuels River and Random Island, eastern Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 381, 1–91.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1849. On the classification of some British fossil Crustacea, with notices of new forms in the University collection at Cambridge. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 2, 4, 161–79, 330–5, 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1962. Glyptagnostus and associated trilobites in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 374-F, 1–49.Google Scholar
Peng, S. C. 1992. Upper Cambrian biostratigraphy and trilobite faunas of the Cili-Taoyuan area, northwestern Hunan, China. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 13, 1–119.Google Scholar
Peng, S. C. & Babcock, L. E. 2005. Two Cambrian agnostoid trilobites, Agnostotes orientalis (Kobayashi, 1935) and Lotagnostus americanus (Billings, 1860): Key species for defining global stages of the Cambrian System. Geosciences Journal 9, 107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S. C., Babcock, L. E., Zuo, J. X., Lin, H. L., Zhu, X. J., Yang, X. F., Qi, Y. P., Bagnoli, G. & Wang, L. W. 2009. Proposed GSSP for the base of Cambrian Stage 9, coinciding with the first appearance of Agnostotes orientalis, at Duibian, Zhejiang, China. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 52, 434–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S. C. & Robison, R. A. 2000. Agnostoid biostratigraphy across the Middle–Upper Cambrian boundary in Hunan, China. Paleontological Society Memoir 53, 1–104.Google Scholar
Peng, S. C., Zuo, J. X., Babcock, L. E., Lin, H. L., Zhou, C. M., Yang, X. F. & Li, Q. 2005. Cambrian sections at Dadoushan near Duibian, Jiangshan, western Zhejiang and candidate stratotype for the base of an unnamed global stage defined by the FAD of Agnostotes orientalis. In Cambrian System of China and South Korea. Guide to Field Excursions. IV International Symposium on the Cambrian System and X Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group (eds Peng, S. C., Babcock, L. E. & Zhu, M. Y.), pp. 210–27. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 300 pp.Google Scholar
Qui, H. A., Lu, Y. H., Zhu, Z. L., Bi, D. C., Lin, T. R., Zhang, Q. Z., Qian, Y. Y., Yu, T. Y., Han, N. R. & Wei, X. Z. 1983. Trilobita. In Paleontological Atlas of East China. Volume of Early Paleozoic (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), pp. 28–254. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Pratt, B. R. 1992. Trilobites of the Marjuman and Steptoean stages (Upper Cambrian), Rabbitkettle Formation, southern Mackenzie Mountains, northwest Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana 9, 1–179.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1982. Some Middle Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from western North America. Journal of Paleontology 56, 132–60.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1984. Cambrian Agnostida of North America and Greenland. Part I, Ptychagnostidae. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper 121, 1–48.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A., Rosova, A. V., Rowell, A. J. & Fletcher, T. P. 1977. Cambrian boundaries and divisions. Lethaia 10, 257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1983. Trilobites from the Upper Cambrian Olenus Zone in central England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 30, 107–39.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of the British trilobites from the Cambrian, Silurian, and Devonian formations. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 1–80.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. B. 1951. The paleontology of northwestern Vermont. I. New late Cambrian trilobites. Journal of Paleontology 25, 97–114.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1977. Classification of the trilobite Pseudagnostus. Palaeontology 20, 69–100.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H., Laurie, J. R. & Sun, X. W. 1990. Classification and review of the trilobite order Agnostida Salter, 1864: an Australian perspective. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Report 296, 1–93.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. & Perfetta, P. J. 2000. Trilobites, biostratigraphy, and lithostratigraphy of the Crepicephalus and Aphelaspis zones, lower Deadwood Formation (Marjuman and Steptoean stages, Upper Cambrian), Black Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Paleontology 74, 199–223.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terfelt, F., Ahlberg, P. & Eriksson, M. E. 2010. Complete record of Furongian polymerid trilobites and agnostoids of Scandinavia – a biostratigraphical scheme. Lethaia, DOI: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00211.x, published online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terfelt, F., Ahlberg, P., Eriksson, M. E. & Clarkson, E. N. K. 2005. Furongian (upper Cambrian) biostratigraphy and trilobites of the Håslöv-1 drill core, Scania, S. Sweden. GFF 127, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terfelt, F. & Ahlgren, J. 2007. Macropyge (Promacropyge) scandinavica new species; the first macropyginid trilobite recorded from the Fuongian of Baltica. Journal of Paleontology 81, 1516–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terfelt, F., Eriksson, M. E., Ahlberg, P. & Babcock, L. E. 2008. Furongian Series (Cambrian) biostratigraphy of Scandinavia – a revision. Norwegian Journal of Geology 88, 73–87.Google Scholar
Troedsson, G. T. 1937. On the Cambro-Ordovician faunas of western Quruq tagh, eastern. T'ien-shan. In Reports from the scientific expedition to the north-western provinces of China under the leadership of Dr Sven Hedin. The Sino-Swedish Expedition, Publication 4. Invertebrate Palaeontology, pp. 1–74. Palaeontologica Sinica, new series B2 (whole series 106).Google Scholar
Tullberg, S. A. 1880. Om Agnostus-arterna i de kambriska aflagringarne vid Andrarum. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning C42, 1–38.Google Scholar
Varlamov, A. I., Pak, K. L. & Rosova, A. V. 2005. Stratigraphy and trilobites from the Upper Cambrian of the Chopko River Section, Norilsk region, northwestern Siberian Platform. Novosibirsk: Nauka Press, 84 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1922. Sveriges olenidskiffer. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning Ca18, 1–205.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1944. Borrningar genom Skånes alunskiffer 1941–42. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning C459, 1–45.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1947. Supplementary notes on the Upper Cambrian trilobites of Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning C489, 1–34.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F. W. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of north-eastern Australia. Part 1, stratigraphic outline, Part 2, Trilobita (Miomera). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 11, 59–112.Google Scholar