Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T13:42:56.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oolites and deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Surendar Kumar
Surendar Kumar
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 14, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study in the deformational patterns of oolites from the Krol Series of the Simla Himalayas has been made in the type area. The deformation in the oolites is the result of the tectonic phenomenon coupled with folding movements during the Himalayan orogeny. The deformation varies with the amount and type of the matrix surrounding the oolites. The angle between the long axis of the ellipse and the principal tectonic extension is smallest in the axial regions of the folds.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 107 , Issue 1 , January 1970 , pp. 31 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auden, J.B. 1934. The Geology of the Krol Belt. Rec. geol. Surv. India, 67, 389–454.Google Scholar
Badgeley, P.C. 1965. Structural and Tectonic Principles, 1st reprint, A. Harper International Student reprint, Tokyo, 50–97.Google Scholar
Beche, , Henry, T. de la, 1851. The Geological Observer, 122–123.Google Scholar
Becker, G. 1907. Current theories of slaty cleavage, Am. J. Sci. 24, 1–17.Google Scholar
Billings, M. P. 1954. Structural Geology. 2nd edition. New York, Prentice-Hall. p.88–92, 340, 357.Google Scholar
Billings, M. P. 1962. Structural Geology. 3rd edition. Asia Publishing House, Bombay. p.359.Google Scholar
Brace, W.F. 1961. Mohr Contruction in the analysis of large geologic strain. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 72, 1059–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. C. 1914. Origin of oolites and the oolitic texture in rocks. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 25, 745–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, W.H. 1918. On oolites and spherulites. J. Geol. 26, 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloos, E. 1947. Oolite deformation in the South Mountain Fold, Maryland. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 58, 843–918.Google Scholar
Flinn, D. 1962. On folding during three-dimensional progressive deformation. Q. Jl geol. Soc Lond. 118, 385–434.Google Scholar
Flinn, D. 1965. Deformation in metamorphism. ‘Controls of metamorphism’. Oliver and Boyd, London. p.48.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B.E. & Talbot, L.J. 1966. The analysis of strain in deformed rocks. J. Geol. 74, 500–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharkwal, A.D. & Kumar, Surendar. 1966. Occurrence of calcareous oolites in the Krol Series (Permian?) of the Simla Hills, Curr. Sci:, 35, 441–442.Google Scholar
Nye, J. F. 1960. Physical properties of crystals. Oxford University Press, London. p. 322.Google Scholar
Plessmann, W. 1964. Gesteinslosung ein Hauptfaktor beim Schieferungsprozess. Geol. Mitt. (Aachen), 4, 69–82.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J.G. 1967. Folding and fracturing of rocks. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York. p.193.Google Scholar
Sander, B. 1950. Einfuhrung in die Gefugekunder der geologischen Körper. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vienna. Pt. 2.Google Scholar
Sitter, L.U. de 1964. Structural geology. New York, McGraw Hill Book Co. p. 551.Google Scholar
Sorby, H.C. 1853. On the origin of slaty cleavage, Edinb. new phil. J. 55, 137–148.Google Scholar
Sorby, H.C. 1879. On the structure and origin of lime stone. Q.Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 35, 56–95.Google Scholar
Truesdell, C. & Toupin, R. 1960. The classical field theories. In Flugge, S. (Ed.): Encyclopedia of Physics: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, III/1. pp.226–793.Google Scholar
Voll, G. 1960. New work on petrofabrics: Lpool Mnchr geol. J. 2, 503–567.Google Scholar