Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:56:59.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Tricycloseris, Anabacia, and some new Genera of Hexacoralla

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

H. Dighton Thomas
H. Dighton Thomas
Affiliation:
British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The genus Tricycloseris was erected by R. F. Tomes in 1878 (p. 190) for a single specimen of a compound coral obtained from a fallen block on the shore near Charmouth, Dorset. The associated fauna led him to postulate a Middle Lias age for the bed from which the block was derived. A recent examination of the specimen shows that Tomes’s diagnosis was unfortunately based on a complete misconception of the coral—what he termed the “upper surface” is actually the under surface, and what he referred to as the “under surface” is, in reality, the calicular surface.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 72 , Issue 9 , September 1935 , pp. 424 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cox, L. R., 1930. “On British Fossils named by William Smith,” Ann. Mag. Nat Hist., (10), vi, 287–304, pl. xii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, P. M., 1884. “A Revision of the Families and Genera of the Sclerodermic Zoantharia, Ed. & H., or Madreporaria (M. Rugosa excepted),” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool., xviii.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. M., and Haime, J., 07, 1849. “Mémoire sur les Polypiers appartenant à la famille des Oculinides, au groupe intermédiate des Pseudastréides et à la famille des Fongides, (Extrait),” Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, xxvii, 67–73.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. M., and Haime, J., 1850. “A Monograph of the British Fossil Corals, pt. i, Introduction,” Mon. Pal. Soc. Lond. Google Scholar
Edwards, H. M., and Haime, J., 1851. Mon. Pal. Soc. Lond., pt. ii.Google Scholar
Fromentel, E. de, 1861. “Introduction a l’Étude des Polypiers fossiles,” Mém. Soc. Émul. Départ. Doubs. Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W., 1900. “The Jurassic Fauna of Cutch, vol. ii, pt. ii, The Corals,” Mem. Geol. Sun. India, Palaeont. Indica, ser. ix.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W., 1925. “The Collection of Fossils and Rocks from Somaliland, pt. iv, Fossil Corals,” Mon. Geol. Dept. Hunterian Museum Glasgow Univ., i, 22–45, pls. iv–viii.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. A., 1846. “A few Notes on the Prices of Fossils,” Lond. Geol. Journ., i, 13–17.Google Scholar
d’Orbigny, A., 10., 1849. Note sur des Polypiers fossiles. Paris.Google Scholar
D’Orbigny, A., 01., 1850. Prodrome de Paléontologie, i. Paris.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J., 1808. Organic Remains of a Former World, etc., ii. London.Google Scholar
Pratz, E., 1882. “Ueber die verwandtsehaftlichen Beziehungen einiger Korallengattungen,” Palaeontographica, xxix, 81–124, pl. xiv.Google Scholar
Smith, W., 1819. Strata identified by Organized Fossils, pt. iv. London.Google Scholar
Tomes, R. F., 1878. “On the Stratigraphical Position of the Corals of the Lias of the Midland and Western Counties of England and of South Wales,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxiv, 179–195, pl. ix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomes, R. F., 1883. “On the Fossil Madreporaria of the Great Oolite of the Counties of Gloucester and Oxford,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxix, 168–195, pl. vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomes, R. F., 1885. “On some New or Imperfectly Known Madreporaria from the Great Oolite of the Counties of Oxford, Gloucester, and Somerset,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xli, 170–190, pl. v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yabe, H., and Eguchi, M., 1933. “Anabacia cyclolitoides sp. nov. from Japan, with remarks on the Genus Anabacia,” Jap. Journ. Geol. Geog., x, 119–124, pl. xi.Google Scholar