Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:35:51.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Certain Endocranial Structures in Coccosteus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Edwin Sherbon Hills
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne.

Extract

Since 1876, when McCoy described two specimens of tuberculated plates under the name Asterolepis ornata var. australis, placoderm remains have been known to occur in the Middle Devonian marine limestones of Buchan, Victoria, Australia. Some years later, another specimen was obtained from the Buchan limestones by W. H. Ferguson of the Geological Survey of Victoria, and was referred by Chapman (1916) to the genus Phlyctaenaspis. Chapman, regarding McCoy's specimens as cospecific with the new material, included all the remains in the species Phlyctaenaspis australis (McCoy), distinguishing the more complete specimen discovered by Ferguson as P. australis var. confertituberculata Chapman. As Phlyctaenaspis is a form typical of the Lower Devonian, its reported occurrence in the Middle Devonian seemed to warrant further investigation. I therefore undertook a re-examination of all the available material, which is now preserved in the National Museum, Melbourne, and spent some months in removing the matrix from Ferguson's specimen. The matrix is a hard carbonaceous limestone containing remains of Spirifer yassensis and other invertebrates, and it was found that dilute hydrochloric acid would dissolve away this matrix without seriously affecting the fish plates, although care had to be taken not to subject these to too long contact with the acid. When as much of the matrix as possible had been removed mechanically by grinding, the fossil was exposed by brushing the dilute acid on to the remainder with a camel-hair brush, and continually observing the result under a binocular microscope.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allis, E. P., 1914. “ The Pituitary Fossa and Trigeminofacialis chamber in Selachians,” Anal. Am., xlvi, 625637.Google Scholar
Chapman, F., 1916. “ On the Generic Position of ‘ Asterolepis ornata var. australis ’ McCoy: with Description of a New Variety,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Viet., xxviii (N.S.), pt. 2, 211–15.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E. S., 1930. Studies on the Strusiture and Development of Vertebrates. Macmillan and Co., London.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1931. Revision of the Structure of Coccosteus decipiens Ag., Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., xii, 291313.Google Scholar
Heintz, A. 1932. The Structure of Dinisihthys. A Contribution to our Knowledge of the Arthrodira, Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Bashford Dean Memorial Volume), Art. iv.Google Scholar
Hussakof, L., Bryant, W. L., 1918. Catalog of the Fossil Fishes in the Museum of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, Bul. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci., xii, 1346.Google Scholar
Mccoy, F., 1876. Asterolepis australis (Eichwald) var. australis (McCoy), Prod. Pal. Vict., Dec. iv, 19, 20.Google Scholar
Obrutschew, D., 1929. Über Coccosteus trautscholdi (Eastman), Tray. Mus. Geol., Acad. Sci., U.R.S.S., viii, 285310.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E. A., 1925. On the Head of the Macropetalichthyids, with Certain Remarks on the Head of the other Arthrodires, Field Mug. Nat. Hist. (Geol Ser.), iv, 87197.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E. A., 1932. The Cephalaspids of Great Britain, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), London.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E. A. 1934. On the Heads of Certain Arthrodires, Kgl. Svenska Vet. Akad. Hand., Tred. Ser., xiii, 179.Google Scholar
Stetsn, H. C., 1930. Notes on the Structure of Dinichthys and Macropetalichthys, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Harvard, lxxi, 1939.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., 1932. On Three New Species of Fish from the Old Red Sandstone of Orkney and Shetland, Geol. Surv. Great Britain, Summ. prog. for 1931, Pt. 2 157166.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1932. The Interpretation of Arthrodires, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 437464.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., 1892. Further Contributions to Knowledge of the Devonian Fish-fauna of Canada, Geol. Mag., 481–5.Google Scholar