Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T13:22:18.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nomenclature of the Spilitic Suite. Part II: The Problem of the Spilites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Although spilite as a rock name has been in use for nearly a hundred years, there are few rocks, probably none of equal importance, so incompletely understood. Introduced in 1827 by Brongniart, “spilite” was first used officially in this country by Flett when describing the pillow-lavas of South Devon (Plymouth and Liskeard Memoir, 1907), and has now completely replaced the indefinite terms “greenstone” and “epidiorite”, by which these lavas were formerly known. It is only quite recently that the importance of spilite has been properly appreciated. The progress of research has shown that at several different geological periods lavas of spilitic type have been almost completely dominant in Britain. Typical spilites and keratophyres were extruded in Pre-Cambrian times over a very extensive area, remnants of the flows being preserved in Argyllshire (Tayvallich and Loch Awe), and in Anglesey, localities which must have been far removed from one another at that time. Throughout Ordovician times the basic lavas were almost without exception spilites or closely allied types. The best known examples of spilites in Britain are those occurring abundantly in the Devonian and lower part of the Carboniferous rocks of South-West England, so ably described by Dewey and Flett, to whom most of our knowledge of these rocks is due. To deny the important rôle of spilite in the history of igneous activity in this country is no mere difference of opinion, but a denial of fact. Yet there are many who, with the American geologists, deny not only the importance, but; even the existences of the rock. The other extreme of opinion is found in those who see in the spilitic rocks a series whose petrogenesis presents problems of more than usual interest and which they have elevated to occupy a position comparable in importance with the better known calcic and alkalic suites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 63 note 1 Dewey, and Flett, , Geol. Mag., 1911, p. 202.Google Scholar

page 63 note 2 Greenly, , “Geol. of Anglesey”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1919, vol. i, p. 71.Google Scholar

page 63 note 3 Dewey, ,“Geol. of N. Cornwall”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., 1914, p. 166.Google Scholar

page 63 note 4 Wilson, , Geol. Surv. Canada, Mem. No. 39, 1914, p. 5.Google Scholar

page 64 note 1 Lewis, , Bull. Geol. Soc. America, vol. xxv, 1914, p. 592.Google Scholar

page 66 note 1 Douglas, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxx, 1914, p. 11.Google Scholar

page 66 note 2 Iddings, , Problems of American Petrology. 1915, p. 104.Google Scholar

page 66 note 3 See for example Wilson, , Geol. Surv. Canada, Mem. Xo. 39, 1914 Google Scholar, and Alcock, , Mem. 119, 1920, p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 66 note 4 Cooke, , Geol. Surv. Canada, Mem. 115, 1919, p. 11.Google Scholar

page 67 note 1 Benson, , Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, pt. i, 1915, p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 67 note 2 Bailey, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxix, 1913, p. 282.Google Scholar

page 67 note 3 Worth, , Trans. Devon Assoc., vol. xlviii, 1916, pp. 217–59.Google Scholar

page 67 note 4 Teall, , Mem. Geol Surv., Knapdale, 1911, p. 84.Google Scholar

page 68 note 1 Geikie, , Mem. Geol. Surv., Central and West Fife, 1910, p. 54.Google Scholar

page 68 note 2 Platania, and Johnston-Lavis, , The S. Italian Volcanoes, 1891, pp. 3744.Google Scholar

page 68 note 3 Harker, , Natural History of Igneous Rocks, 1909, p. 64.Google Scholar

page 69 note 1 Green, , Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. 30, 1919, p. 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 70 note 1 Benson, op. cit., p. 140.

page 70 note 2 Flett, , Mem. Geol. Surv., Newton Abbot, 1910, p. 61.Google Scholar

page 71 note 1 Daly, , “Genesis of the Alkaline Rocks”: Journ. of Geol., 1918, p. 101.Google Scholar

page 71 note 2 Lewis, op. cit., p. 535.

page 71 note 3 Daly, , Igneous Rocks and their Origin, 1914, p. 339.Google Scholar