Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:04:15.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Miocene/Oligocene Boundary and the Use of the Term Aquitanian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. E. Eames
Affiliation:
Anglo-Iranian Oil Co., London.

Abstract

It is considered that some fossils, e.g. Orbulina and Miogypsina, are good indicators that beds containing them are of post-Oligocene age, and that the ages of some beds in certain parts of the world require reconsideration; mention is made of successions in Morocco, Venezuela, and Peru. It is recommended that the use of the term “Aquitanian” be restricted to beds of basal Miocene age.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Brönnimann, P., 1940. Über die tertiären Orbitoiden und die Miogypsiniden von Nord-West Marokko. Schweiz. Pal. Abhandl., lxiii, 1113.Google Scholar
Dehm, R., 1949. Zur Oligocän-Miocän-Grenze. N. Jb. Min. usw., Mh., Jg. 1949 (B), 141–6.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W., 1944. The Type section of the Aquitanian. Amer. Journ. Sci., ccxlii, 246250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gignoux, M., 1950. “Géologie Stratigraphique,” 508510, etc.Google Scholar
Haug, E., 19081911. “Traité de Géologie,” ii (3), 1604, 1607, etc.Google Scholar
le Roy, L. W., 1948. The foraminifer Orbulina universa d' Orbigny, a suggested Middle Tertiary time indicator. Journ. Pal., xxii, (4), 500508.Google Scholar
Rutsch, R. E., 1951. Das Typusprofil des Aquitanien. Eclog. geol. Helvet., xliv, 352–5.Google Scholar
Senn, A., 1935. Die stratigraphische Verbreitung der Tertiären Orbitoiden. Eclog. geol. Helvet., xxviii, (1), 51113.Google Scholar
Stainforth, R. M., and Rüegg, W., 1953. Mid-Oligocene Transgression in Southern Peru. Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., xxxvii, No. 3, 568–9.Google Scholar