Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:45:52.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metamorphism in the Upper Devonian of N. Cornwall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. Coles Phillips
Affiliation:
Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.

Extract

The geological succession and structure of the district are briefly summarized. Evidence of stress conditions becomes increasingly abundant as one passes from south to north towards the boundary of the Carboniferous.

The thermal alteration due to the Bodmin Moor granite is definitely delimited by tracing the outer limit of spotting in normal pelitic sediments.

Petrographical study of phyllites from outside this limit shows considerable mineralogical reconstruction in the sediments, with crystallization of white mica, chlorite and chloritoid; in some instances garnet is developed. The distribution of these types shows no relationship to the granite outcrop, but accords with the main structural features of the area.

Analogous changes are prominent in the igneous horizons, with the formation of schists of the general type of prasinite.

Within the aureole thermal effects can be traced superposed on the earlier dynamic changes.

From these lines of inquiry it is concluded that many of the changes in the phyllites, notably the formation of porphyroblastic white mica, chlorite and chloritoid, hitherto ascribed with greater or less finality to the action of the granite, are due to an earlier dynamic metamorphism.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED IN THE TEXT

1847. Pattison, S. R.On the Geology of the Tintagel District”: 34th Ann. Rep. Roy. Geol. Soc. Cornwall, pp. 312.Google Scholar
1865. Pattison, S. R.Geology of the Tintagel District”: Trans. Roy. Geol. Soc. Cornwall, vii, p. 3.Google Scholar
1889. Hutchings, W. M. I: “Notes on Altered Igneous Rocks of Tintagel, North Cornwall”: Geol. Mag., pp. 5359, 101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, W. M. II: “On the occurrence of Ottrelite in the Phyllites of North Cornwall”: Idem., pp. 214–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1903. Parkinson, J.: “Geology of the Tintagel and Davidstow District”: Q.J.G.S., lix, pp. 408–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1909. Dewey, H.On Overthrusts at Tintagel (North Cornwall)”: Q.J.G.S., lxv, pp. 265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1910. Reid, C., et. al. “Geology of the Country around Padstow and Camelford”: Mem. Geol. Surv. Eng. and Wales, Sheets 335 and 336.Google Scholar
1911. Reid, C. “Geology of the country around Tavistock and Launceston”: Idem, sheet 337.Google Scholar
1911. Dewey, H., and Flett, J. S.British Pillow-lavas and the Rocks associated with them”: Geol. Mag., pp. 202–9 and 241–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1914. Dewey, H.The Geology of North Cornwall”: Proc. Geol. Ass., xxv, pp. 154–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1920. Goldschmidt, V. M. “Die Injektionsmetamorphose im Stavanger-Gebiete”: Vidensk. Selsk. Skrift. M. N. Kl., No. 10.Google Scholar
1923. Tilley, C. E.Petrology of the metamorphosed rocks of the Start Area”: Q.J.G.S., lxxix, pp. 172204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1924. Grubenmann, U. and Niggli, P. Die Gesteinsmetamorphose. Berlin, 1924.Google Scholar
1925. Tilley, C. E.Petrographical Notes on some Chloritoid Rocks”: Geol. Mag., lxii, pp. 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1927. Ghosh, P. K.Petrology of the Bodmin Moor Granite, Cornwall”: Mem. Mag., xxi, pp. 301–6.Google Scholar
1928. Phillips, F. C.Petrological Notes on three Rock-types from the Shetland Islands”: Geol. Mag., LXV, pp. 500–7.Google Scholar