Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T07:15:29.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maastrichtian ammonites from the Corsicana Formation in northeast Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. J. Kennedy  and
W. A. Cobban
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, U.K.
W. A. Cobban
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Paleontology and Stratigraphy Branch, Box 25046, Mail Stop 919, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previously undescribed collections of ammonites from the Corsicana Formation (Maastrichtian), the highest unit of the Cretaceous present in northeast Texas, U.S.A., include Eubaculites carinatus (Morton, 1834), Nostoceras (Nostoceras) major sp. nov., Glyptoxoceras sp., and Jeletzkytes sp. nov., which are new records for the unit. Other ammonites are Sphenodiscus lobatus (Tuomey, 1854), S. pleurisepta (Conrad, 1857), Trachyscaphites yorkensis (Stephenson, 1941), Discoscaphites conradi (Morton, 1834) and Baculites columna (Morton, 1834). Elements of the fauna are present in the Escondido Formation in Trans-Pecos Texas and northern Mexico, the Prairie Bluff Chalk in Alabama and Mississippi, the Owl Creek Formation in Mississippi, Tennessee and Missouri, and the Severn Formation in Maryland. In the U.S. Western Interior they occur in the Hoploscaphites nicolleti Zone, in the Fox Hills Formation.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 130 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 57 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basse, E. 1952. Ammonoides. In Traite de Paléontologie 2 (ed. Piveteau, J.), pp. 522–55, 581–688. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Binkhorst, J. T. 1861. Monographie des gastropodes et des céphalopodes de la Craie Supérieure du Limbourg, 17 + 83 pp. (gastropods)+ 44 pp. (cephalopods), 17 pls (1–5, 5a, 5al, 5a2, 5a3, 6, 5b, 5c, 5d, 7, 8, 8a, 9) Maastricht, Muquardt; Brussels, Muller Frères.Google Scholar
Birkelund, T., Hancock, J. M., Hart, M. B., Rawson, P. F., Remane, J., Robaszynski, F., Schmid, F. & Surlyk, G. 1984. Cretaceous stage boundaries – proposals. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 33, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, J. 1998. Über Ammonites pedernalis V. Buch. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 1898, 183–201, pls 5–7.Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1928. Cretaceous ammonites from Texas and northern Mexico. Bulletin of University of Texas 2748, 143–357, pls 1–18 (misdated 1927).Google Scholar
Brouwers, E. M. & Hazel, J. E. 1978. Ostracoda and correlation of the Severn Formation (Navarroan; Maestrichtian) of Maryland. Society of Economic Palaeontologists and Mineralogists Monograph no. 1, 52 pp., 11 pls.Google Scholar
Brunnschweiler, R. O. 1966. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Carnavon Basin of Western Australia. 1. The heteromorph Lytoceratina. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia no. 58, 58 pp., 8 pls.Google Scholar
Caron, M. 1985. Cretaceous planktic foraminifera. In Plankton Stratigraphy (eds Bolli, H. and others), pp. 17–86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1971. Atlas des fossiles caractéristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites) XVII (Maestrichtien). Service Géologique, Tananarive, iv + 44 pp., pls 640–58.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1955. Descriptions of eighteen new Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences 7, 265–268.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1857. Descriptions of Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. In Report on the United States and Mexican boundary survey (ed. Emery, W. H.), U.S. 34th Congress 1st Session, Senate Ex Document 108 and House Ex Document 135, 1, (2), 141–74.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1958. Observations on a group of Cretaceous fossil shells, found in Tippah County, Mississippi, with descriptions of fifty-six new species. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (2) 3, 323–36, pls 34–5.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. D. 1971. Maestrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) biostratigraphy, Maverick County, Texas, and northern Coahuila, Mexico. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, 21st Annual Meeting, New Orleans, 1971, 57–65.Google Scholar
Crick, G. C. 1924. On Upper Cretaceous cephalopods from Portuguese East Africa. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa 26, 130–40, pl. 9.Google Scholar
Elias, M. K. 1933. Cephalopods of the Pierre formation of Wallace County, Kansas and adjacent area. Kansas University Science Bulletin 21, 289–363, pls 28–42.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1846. Report on the fossil Invertebrata from southern India, collected by Mr Kaye and Mr Cunliffe. Transactions of the Geological Society of London (2), 7, 97–174, pls 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frech, F. 1915. Über Scaphites. 1. Die Bedeutung von Scaphites für die Gliederung der Oberkreide. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 1915, 553–68.Google Scholar
Garcia, E. R. de & Camacho, H. H. 1965. Descriptión de fósiles procedentes de una perforatión efectuada en la provincia de Santa Cruz (Argentina). Ameghinia 4, 71–3.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A. 1916. Mollusca. In Systematic paleontology, Upper Cretaceous (ed. Berry, E. W. and others). Maryland Geological Survey, Upper Cretaceous [volume], 371–733, pls 12–45.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1971. Arrangement of the families of mollusks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 227, xvi + 49 pp.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1921. A Textbook of Geology, Part 2. D. C. Heath and Company, New York, 976 pp.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. & Shimer, H. W. 1910. North American Index Fossils: Invertebrates 2, New York, A. G. Seiler and Co., xv + 909 pp.Google Scholar
Grossouvre, A. de. 1994. Recherches sur la craie supérieure, 2, Paléontolgie. Les ammonities de la craie supérieure. Mémoires du Service de la Carte Géologique détaille de la France, 264 pp., 39 pls. (misdated 1893).Google Scholar
Grossouvre, A. de. 1908. Description des ammonitides du Crétacé Supérieur du Limbourg Belge et Hollandais et du Hainaut. Mémoires Muséum royale Histoire naturelle de Belgique 4, 1–39, pls 1–11.Google Scholar
Hansen, T., Farrand, R. B., Montgomery, H. A., Billman, H. G. & Blechschmidt, G. 1987. Sedimentology and extinction patterns across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary interval in east Texas. Cretaceous Research 8, 229–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. T. 1901. Geology and geography of the Black and Grand Prairies, Texas. Report of the United States Geological Survey no. 21, 666 pp.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1894. Phylogeny of an acquired characteristic. Proceedings of the American Philosophical 32, 349–647, pls 1–14.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda. In Textbook of Palaeontology (K. A. von Zittell; 1896–1900), pp. 502–604. (transl. Eastman, C. R,) Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1903. Pseudoceratites of the Cretaceous. Geological Survey Monograph no. 44, 351 pp., 47 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeletzky, J. A. & Waage, K. M. 1978. Revision of Ammonites conradi Morton 1834, and the concept of Discoscaphites Meek 1870. Journal of Paleontology 52 (5), 1119–32, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1977. Illustrated guide to biostratigraphically important Cretaceous macrofossils, Western Interior basin, USA. Mountain Geologist 14, 225–74, 32 pls.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1977. Ammonite evolution. Patterns of Evolution (ed. Hallam, A.), pp. 251–330. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1986. The Campanian–Maastrichtian ammonite sequence in the environs of Maastricht (Limburg, The Netherlands), Limburg and Liège provinces (Belgium). Newsletters on Stratigraphy 16 (3), 149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1987. The ammonite faunas of the type Maastrichtian, with a revision of Ammonites colligatus Binkhorst, 1861. Bulletin de L'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 56, 151–267, 37 pls.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Bilotte, M., Lepicard, B. & Segura, F. 1986. Upper Campanian and Maastrichtian ammonites from the Petites Pyrénées, southern France. Ecolgae Geologicae Helvetiae 79, 1001–37, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. & Cobban, W. A. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography and biostratigraphy. Palaeontological Association of London Special Papers in Palaeontology no. 17, 94 pp., 11 pls.Google Scholar
Kossmat, F. 1895–1898. Untersuchungen über die Südindische Kreideformation. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients 9, (1895): 97–203 (1–107), pls 15–25 (1–11); 11, (1897a): 1–46 (108–153), pls 1–8 (12–19); 11, (1898): 89–152 (154–217), pls 14–19 (20–25).Google Scholar
Lasswitz, R. 1904. Die Kreide-Ammoniten von Texas (Collectio F. Roemer). Geologische und Palaeontologische Abhandlungen n.s. 6, (10), 221–59, pls 13–20.Google Scholar
Logan, W. N. 1898. The invertebrates of the Benton, Niobrara, and Fort Pierre Groups. Kansas University Geological Survey 4 (8), 431–518, pls 86–120.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1970. A preliminary list of fossils, collected by Dr Hayden in Colorado, New Mexico and California, with brief descriptions of a few of the new species. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 11, 425–431.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1871. Preliminary paleontological report, consisting of lists of fossils, with descriptions of some new types etc. Preliminary Report of The United States Geological Survey of Wyoming and portions of contiguous Territories 4, 287–318.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories 9, lxiv + 629 pp, 45 pls.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group of the United States. Illustrated by nineteen plates, to which is added an appendix containing a tubular view of the Tertiary fossils discovered in America. Key and Biddle, Philadelphia, 88 pp, 18 pls.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D'. 1847. Paléontologie, pls 1–6 (Géologic pls. 4–9), In Dumont D' Urville M. de 1846–1854. Voyage au Pole Sud et dans l' Oceanic sur les corvelles L' Astrolabe et la Zelée pendant les annees 1837–1838–1839–1840 sous le commandément de M. Dumont D' Urville Capitaine du Vaisseau. Pls. 1–9. de et Baudry, G. (Eds), Imprimerie de J. Claye et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D'. 1950. Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés 2, Masson, Paris, 428 pp.Google Scholar
Owen, D. D. 1852. Report of a Geological Survey of Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota, and incidentally of a portion of Nebraska Territory, made under instructions from the United States Treasury Department. Lippincott, Grambo & Co., Philadelphia, 638 pp., 29 pls.Google Scholar
Owens, J. P., Minard, J. P., Sohl, N. F. & Mello, J. F. 1970. Stratigraphy of the outcropping post-Magothy Upper Cretaceous formations in southern New Jersey and northern Delmarva Peninsula, Delaware and Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 674, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Pessagno, E. Jr,, 1969. Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy of the Western Gulf Coast area, Mexico, Texas and Arkansas. Geological Society of America Memoir 111, xiii + 139 pp.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1829. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire. x + 192 pp. 9 + 14. Thomas Wilson, York.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1955. The Cretaceous Ammonoidea of Nigeria and the southern Cameroons. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Nigeria 25, 112 pp., 25 pls.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1980. Presencia de epizoos en un amonoideo heteromorfo del Maastrichtiano de Argentina; una inferencia paleoautoecologica. Ameghiniana 17 (1), 11–14.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1983. Scaphitids from the upper Campanian-lower Maastrictian Bearpaw Formation of the western interior of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 354, 103 pp., 26 pls.Google Scholar
Roman, F. 1938. Les ammonites jurassiques et crétacées. Essai de genera. 554 pp., 53 pls. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Smith, C. C. & Pessagno, E. A. Jr., 1973. Planktonic foraminifera and stratigraphy of the Corsicana Formation (Maestrichtian), north-central Texas. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 12, 68 pp., 27 pls.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1960. Archeogastropoda, Mesogastropoda, and stratigraphy of the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff formations. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 331– A, 151 pp., pls 1–18.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1964. Neogastropoda, Opisthobranchia, and Basommatophora from the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff Formations – Late Cretaceous gastropods in Tennessee and Mississippi. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 331– B, 153–344, pls 19–52.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1925. On Senonian Ammonoidea from Jamaica. Geological Magazine 62, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1926. On new ammonites from the English Chalk. Geological Magazine 63, 77–83, table.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1940. On Upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) Ammonoidea from Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 26, 41–57, pls 1, 2.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1926. Mesozoic rocks, p. 231–250, 15 pls., in Adams D. G., Butts C., Stephenson L. W., and Cooke W., Geology of Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama Special Report 14, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1941. The larger invertebrates of the Navarro Group of Texas (exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido Formation). University of Texas Bulletin 4101, 641 pp., 95 pls.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1955. Owl Creek (Upper Cretaceous) fossils from Crowleys Ridge, southeastern Missouri. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 274– E, 97–140, pls. 14–24.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. & Monroe, W. H. 1940. The Upper Cretaceous deposits [Mississippi]. Mississippi Geological Survey Bulletin 40, 296 pp.Google Scholar
Stinnesbeck, W. 1986. Zu den faunistischen und palökologischen Verhältnissen in der Quinquina Formation (Maastrichtium) Zentral-Chiles. Palaeontographica, A 194, 99–237, pls. 1–15.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1863–1866. The fossil Cephalopoda of the Cretaceous rocks of southern India. Ammonitidae with revision of the Nautilidae etc. Memoirs of the Geological Survey fo India. (1). Palaeontologica Indica 3, (1), 41–56, pls 26–31 (1863); (2–5), 57–106, pls 32–54 (1864); (6–9), 107–154, pls. 55–80 (1865); (10–13), 155–216, pls. 81–94 (1866).Google Scholar
Tuomey, M. 1854. Description of some new fossils from the Cretaceous rocks of the southern states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 7, 167–172.Google Scholar
Waage, K. M. 1968. The type Fox Hills Formation, Cretaceous (Maestrichtian), South Dakota. Part 1, Stratigraphy and paleoenvironments. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Bulletin 27, 1–175, 12 pls.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1966. Stammesgeschichte und System der posttriadischen Ammonoideen; ein Überblick. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 125, 49–79, pls. 1–2; 127, 13–81, pls 3–6.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. 1957. In Moore, R. C. (ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part L. Mollusca 4, Cephalopoda Ammonoidea. xxii + 490 pp., New York and Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Zaborski, P. M. P. 1982. Campanian and Maastrichtian sphenodiscid ammonites from southern Nigeria. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 36, 303–332.Google Scholar