Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:06:21.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ludlovian Classification—A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Abstract

The revised classification of the Ludlovian rocks is defended. It is maintained that there is no need for separate rock-stratigraphical and biostratigraphical classifications. The nine new divisions are, therefore, combined units; their number is justified by the detailed mapping and their names are dictated by the requirements of the rocks and not by an arbitrary code of rules. The old classification, using Aymestry Limestone, is considered to be still usable as a crude rock-stratigraphical classification.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1961. Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature. Bull. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., 45, 645665.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J., 1956. Comments on Stratigraphic Procedure and Terminology. Amer. J. Sci., 254, 457467.Google Scholar
Hedberg, H. D., 1958. Stratigraphic Classification and Terminology. Bull. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., 42, 18811896.Google Scholar
Holland, C. H., Lawson, J. D., and Walmsley, V. G.. The Silurian Rocks of the Ludlow District, Shropshire. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geology (in the press).Google Scholar
Lexique Stratigraphique International, 1961. Vol. I, Fascicule 3 a V (Silurien).Google Scholar
Phipps, C. B., 1957. The Structure and Stratigraphy of the Silurian rocks west of the South Malvern Hills. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar