Article contents
Ludlovian Classification—A Reply
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Abstract
The revised classification of the Ludlovian rocks is defended. It is maintained that there is no need for separate rock-stratigraphical and biostratigraphical classifications. The nine new divisions are, therefore, combined units; their number is justified by the detailed mapping and their names are dictated by the requirements of the rocks and not by an arbitrary code of rules. The old classification, using Aymestry Limestone, is considered to be still usable as a crude rock-stratigraphical classification.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962
References
REFERENCES
- 6
- Cited by