Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:14:48.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lower Limit of the Pleistocene in Europe and Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Guy E. Pilgrim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The line of demarcation between the Pliocene and the Pleistocene systems is of more importance than would at first sight appear, if for no other reason than because when stratigraphers and palaeontologists are forced by one consideration or another to use the system in preference to the stage names it is often impossible to gather the actual age which they attribute to the deposit or fauna which they are describing. This paper aims at explaining my own point of view, by which I hope to incline adverse scientific opinion towards a definite predilection for the division which I myself favour. Perhaps this may eventually lead to a pronouncement on the question by an authoritative international committee.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , February 1944 , pp. 28 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LIST OF LITERATURE QUOTED

Boswell, P. G. H., 1931. The stratigraphy of the glacial deposits of East Anglia in relation to early Man. Proc. Geol. Assoc., London, xlii, 87–109.Google Scholar
Boswell, P. G. H., 1932. The contacts of geology: The Ice Age and early Man in Britain. British Ass. Adv. Sci., 1932, 57–88.Google Scholar
Boswell, P. G. H., 1936. Problems of the borderland of Archaeology and Geology in Britain. Proc. Prehist. Soc., 1936, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, A. L., 1938. Pleistocene glaciation in North-Western India with special reference to the erratics of the Punjab. Rec. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Depéret, C., Mayet, L., Roman, F., 1923. Les Elephants Pliocénes. Ann. Univ. Lyon, fasc. 42, 1–224.Google Scholar
Desnoyers, M. J., 1863. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, lvi, 1073, 1199.Google Scholar
De Terra, H., and Teilhard de Chardin, P., 1936. Observations on the Upper Siwalik formation and Later Pleistocene deposits in India. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., lxxvi, 791–822.Google Scholar
De Terra, H., and Paterson, T. T., 1939. Studies on the Ice Age in India and associated human cultures. Carnegie Inst. Washington, publ. no. 493, 1–354.Google Scholar
Haug, E., 1911. Traité de Géologie, II: Les périodes géologiques, 8vo, Paris.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. T., 1935. Fossil elephants and Man. Proc. Geol. Assoc., London, xlvi, 46–60.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. T., 1936. Earth-movements, Ice Ages, and Faunas. Geol. Mag., lxxiii, 185–8.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. T., 1938. See Pilgrim, G. E.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. T., 1940. Fossil Mammals and Pleistocene correlation. Proc. Geol. Assoc., London, li, 79–88.Google Scholar
Keith, A., 1915. The Antiquity of Man. 8vo, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. E., 1937. A new Siwalik correlation. Amer. Journ. Sci., xxxiii, 191–204.Google Scholar
Morris, T. O., 1938. The Bain Boulder Bed, a glacial episode in the Siwalik series of the Marwat Kundi Range and Sheik Budin, North-West Frontier Province, India. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, xciv, 385–421.Google Scholar
Paterson, T. T., 1939. See de Terra, H.Google Scholar
Paterson, T. T., 1940. Geology and Early Man. Nature, cxlvi, 12–15, 49–52.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, G. E., 1913. Correlation of the Siwaliks with mammal horizons of Europe. Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind., xliii, 264–326.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, G. E., 1938. Are the Equidae reliable for the correlation of the Siwaliks with the Coenozoic stages of North America. Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind., lxxiii, 437–442. Appendix by A. T. Hopwood, 472–9.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, G. E., 1939. The Fossil Bovidae of India. Pal. Ind., N.S., xxvi, 1–358.Google Scholar
Pilgrim, G. E., 1940. The application of the European time scale to the Upper Tertiary of North America. Geol. Mag., lxxvii, 1–27.Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, P., 1936. See de Terra, H.Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, P., 1937. The Post-Villafranchian interval in North China. Bull. Geol. Soc. China, xvii, 169–176.Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, P., 1938. Le Villafranchien d'Asie et la question du Villafranchien. C.R.S. Soc. Géol. France, no. 17, 325–7.Google Scholar
Vredenburg, E., 1906. Pleistocene movement as indicated by irregularities of gradient of the Narbada and other rivers in the Indian Peninsula. Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind., xxxiii, 33–45.Google Scholar
Weidenreich, F., 1939. Six lectures on Sinanthropus pekinensis and related problems. Bull Geol. Soc. China, xix, 1–92.Google Scholar
Weidenreich, F., 1940. Man or Ape? Nat. Hist. Mag., xlv, No. 1.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1935. The Pleistocene chronology of Central Europe. Geol. Mag., lxxii, 350–376.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1936. Paleobiology and climate of the past. Publ Lab. Pal., Moscow. Problems of Paleontology, i, 199–216.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1937. A comparison of the Pleistocene of East Anglia with that of Germany. Proc. Prehist. Soc., 136–157.Google Scholar