Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:41:01.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limestone and the Origin of Felspathoidal Rocks: an Aftermath of the Geological Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. J. Shand
S. J. Shand
Affiliation:
Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

If there is one branch of geology that was more strongly represented than another at the Fifteenth International Geological Congress in Pretoria, it is petrology. It is true that the petrologists did not present many papers, and that their official discussions were rather scamped, but it was on the excursions that they showed their real strength. I shall not soon forget the day when I conducted a party of fifty to Pilansberg. To see them jump from the buses at every stop; to hear fifty hammers ringing at once on my favourite nepheline rocks; to see the collecting bags swelling and the buses sinking lower and lower on their springs; few sights have ever given me keener pleasure. The Franspoort-Leeuwfontein excursion was also a purely petrological occasion, in which more than fifty took part; and then at the end of the Congress some thirty of us enjoyed ten days of concentrated petrology on the Bushveld excursion, under the inspiring leadership of A. L. Hall.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 67 , Issue 9 , September 1930 , pp. 415 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

PRINCIPAL REFERENCES

Daly, R. A.. (1) Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 1910, p. 87; (2) Igneous Rocks and their Origins, 1914; (3) Jour. Geol., 1918, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, N. L.. (1) Jour. Geol., 1915, Suppt., p. 56; (2) Evolution of the Igneous Rocks, 1928, chaps. xi, xii.Google Scholar
Smyth, C. H.. (1) Amer. Jour. Sci., 1913, p. 33; (2) Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1929, p. 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shand, S. J.. (1) Proc. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, 1922 (1923), p. xix; (2) Eruptive Rocks, 1927, p. 226.Google Scholar
Holmes, A.. Q.J.G.S., 1916, p. 252.Google Scholar
Foye, W. G.. Amer. Jour. Sci., 1915, p. 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, T.. Norsk Videnskaps Akad., Oslo, 1927, no. 8.Google Scholar
Gillson, J. L.. Jour. Geol., 1928, p. 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. E.. Geol. Mag., 1929, p. 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, H. A.. Kon. Akad. Wet., Amsterdam, 1928, p. 492.Google Scholar
Tory Hill. Foye, W. G. Kon. Akad. Wet., Amsterdam, 1928, p. 492.Google Scholar
Mount Royal. Lacroix, A., Bull. Soc. Géol. de France, 1890, p. 511.Google Scholar
Oka Hills. Stansfield, J., Geol. Mag., 1923, p. 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ice River. Allen, J. A., Geol. Surv. Canada, Mem. 55, 1914, p. 121.Google Scholar
Magnet Cove. Williams, J. F., Geol. Surv. Arkansas, 1891.Google Scholar
Jacupiranga. Derby, O. A., Amer. Jour. Sci., 1891, p. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loch Borolan. Horne, J. and Teall, J. J. H., Tr. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 1892, p. 163.Google Scholar
Loch Borolan. Shand, S. J., Trans. Geol. Soc. Edinb., 1910, p. 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fen district. Brögger, W. C., Eruptivgesteine Krist., iv, 1921.Google Scholar
Alnö. Högbom, A. G., Sveriges Geol. Unders., no. 148, 1895.Google Scholar
Kuolajärvi. Hackman, V., Bull. Comm. Geol. Finlande, no. 72, 1925.Google Scholar
Sviatoy Noss. Eskola, P., Finska Vet. Soc. Förhandl., no. i, 1921.Google Scholar
Botogol Hill. Jaczewski, L., Explorations le long du chemin de fer de Siberie, 1899.Google Scholar
Granitberg. Kaiser, E., Die Diamantenwüste S. W. Afrikas, 1926, chap. xiii.Google Scholar
Sekukuniland. Shand, S. J., Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, 1921 (1923), p. 111.Google Scholar
Palabora. Hall, A. L., Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, 1912 (1913), p. 4.Google Scholar
Turja. Kranck, E. H., Fennia 51, no. 5, 1928.Google Scholar