Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:32:52.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Karst development on a mobile substrate: Konarsiah salt extrusion, Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2011

MEHDI ZAREỊ
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
EZATOLAH RAEISI
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
CHRISTOPHER J. TALBOT*
Affiliation:
Hans Ramberg Tectonic Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Most karst terranes develop slowly on static limestone substrates as part of the global hydrological cycle. Here we introduce the novel concept of a karst morphology developing very rapidly on a more soluble substrate of salt (NaCl) that is moving through its own global cycle. We open with a reminder of karst features and processes in limestone. We then illustrate the global salt cycle using the 180 or so extrusions of Hormoz salt in the Zagros Mountains of Iran. After describing the geology of an example, we consider how it fits into the evolution of salt extrusions. This example, Konarsiah, was chosen for its simple hydrology. Konarsiah is covered by residual soils of the insoluble components that remain in place as the Hormoz salt is dissolved. Dolines in the surface of these soils enlarge and the soils thicken as the moving salt dissolves. The long-term rate of salt dissolution and soil production on Konarsiah are estimated using traditional methods. The calculated age of the thickest, most distal soil is used to constrain the average rate at which the underlying salt flows downslope after extruding from two vents. The average velocities constrained for salt flow are lower than rates of displacement of markers near the summit of Konarsiah measured at irregular intervals over five years. Salt extruding from recently truncated diapirs near the arid south coast of Iran exhibit all the features seen in classical karst terranes. In the more humid mountains inland, vegetated soils protect salt extrusions like Konarsiah from erosion and limit their salt karst features. Soil covers also probably even out salt flow velocities. Salt extrusions advance when such protective covers grow and thicken in humid conditions. They retreat when such protection is lost to erosion in drier conditions. These external signs complement internal recumbent folds in extruded salt that signal intervals of faster salt flow when wet than dry. They also add to the features that render salt extrusions records of climate change.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aftabi, P., Roustaie, M., Alsop, G. I. & Talbot, C. J. 2010. InSAR mapping and modelling of an active Iranian salt extrusion. Journal of the Geological Society, London 167, 155–70.Google Scholar
Bosak, P., Bruthans, J., Filippi, M., Svoboda, T. & Smid, J. 1999. Karst and caves in salt diapirs, S E Zagros Mountains, Iran. Acta Carsologica 28, 4175.Google Scholar
Bruthans, J., Asadi, N., Filippi, M., Vilhelm, Z. & Zare, M. 2008. A study of erosion rates on salt diapir surfaces in the Zagros Mountains, SE Iran. Environmental Geology 53, 1079–89.Google Scholar
Bruthans, J., Filippi, M., Asadi, N., Zare, M., Šlechta, S. & ChuráˇCková, Z. 2009. Surficial deposits on salt diapirs (Zagros Mountains and Persian Gulf Platform, Iran): characterization, evolution, erosion and the influence on landscape morphology. Geomorphology 107, 195209.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, J. W., Talbot, C. J. & Aftabi, P. 2009. A train of kink folds in the surficial salt of Qom Kuh, Central Iran. Journal of Structural Geology 31, 1212–22.Google Scholar
Ford, D. & Williams, P. 2007. Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 601 pp.Google Scholar
Frumkin, A. 1994. Hydrology and denudation rates of halite karst. Journal of Hydrology 162, 171–89.Google Scholar
Kent, P. E. 1979. The emergent Hormuz salt plugs of southern Iran. Journal of Petroleum Geology 2, 117–44.Google Scholar
Mottershead, D. N., Duane, W., Inkpen, R. J. & Wright, J. S. 2005. Subaerial karstic erosion of small-scale saltrock terrains. In 6th International Conference on Geomorphology, Zaragosa, Cardona, Spain, Abstract volume (eds Gutiérrez, F., Gutiérrez, M., Desir, G., Guerrero, J., Lucha, P., Marín, C. & García-Ruiz, J. M.), pp. 453.Google Scholar
Schleder, Z. & Urai, J. L. 2006. Deformation and recrystallization mechanisms in mylonitic shear zones in naturally deformed extrusive Eocene-Oligocene rocksalt from Eyvanekey plateau and Garmsar hills (central Iran). Journal of Structural Geology 29, 2241–55.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. 1981. Sliding and other deformation mechanisms in a glacier of salt, S Iran. In Thrust and Nappe Tectonics (eds McClay, K. R. & Price, N. J.), pp. 173–83. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 9.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. 1998. Extrusions of Hormuz salt in Iran. In Lyell: The Past is the Key to the Present (eds Blundell, D. J. & Scott, A. C.), pp. 315–34. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 143.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. 2004. Extensional evolution of the Gulf of Mexico basin and deposition of Tertiary evaporites: discussion. Journal of Petroleum Geology 27, 95104.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. & Aftabi, P. 2004. Geology and models of salt extrusion at Qum Kuh, central Iran. Journal of the Geological Society, London 161, 321–34.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. & Alavi, M. 1996. The past of a future syntaxis across the Zagros. In Salt Tectonics (eds Alsop, G. I., Blundell, D. J. & Davison, I.), pp. 89109. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 100.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. & Jarvis, R. J. 1984. Age, budget and dynamics of an active salt extrusion in Iran. Journal of Structural Geology 6, 521–33.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J., Medvedev, S., Alavi, M., Shahrivar, H. & Heidari, E. 2000. Salt extrusion rates at Kuh-e-Jahani, Iran: June 1994 to November 1997. In Salt, Shale and Igneous Diapirs In and Around Europe (eds Vendeville, B., Mart, Y. & Vigneresse, J.-L.), pp. 93110. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 174.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. & Pohjola, V. 2009. Subaerial salt extrusions in Iran as analogues of ice sheets, streams and glaciers. Earth Science Reviews 97, 167–95.Google Scholar
Waltham, T. 2007. Karst and caves within the salt domes of Iran. Cave and Karst Science 34, 91–6.Google Scholar
Waltham, T., Bell, F. & Culshaw, M. 2005. Sinkholes and subsidence. Berlin: Springer, 382 pp.Google Scholar
Warren, J. K. 1999. Evaporites: Their Evolution and Economics. London: Blackwell Science, 438 pp.Google Scholar
Zarei, M. & Raeisi, E. 2010. Karst development and hydrogeology of Konarsiah salt diapir, South of Iran. Carbonates and Evaporites 25, 217–29.Google Scholar