Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:34:38.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—The Classification of the Rocks of the Western Australian Goldfields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Sedimentary Formations in the Goldfields.—Sedimentary rocks are rare in all the goldfields south of the Gascoyne River, if superficial deposits of Tertiary or Recent age be omitted. It is true that a sedimentary origin has at times been ascribed to the jaspers, and still more commonly to the bands of graphitic schists within the greenstones. Hand-specimens of the latter rocks and of slaty rocks associated with the jaspers are indistinguishable from similar rocks of sedimentary origin, and it is only by the study of the geological occurrence of the bands that their derivation from igneous rocks can be proved. It is probable, therefore, that many of the rocks mapped as ‘older sediments’ by W. D. Campbell in Kalgoorlie and Norseman are not sediments. There are, however, undoubted sedimentary rocks between Kalgoorlie and Coolgardie, viz. the Kurrawang conglomerates. The enclosed pebbles are largely jaspers and porphyries, so that the formation of the conglomerates must be posterior to the intrusion of the granites, and yet the matrix is sub-schistose and the axes of folding are parallel to the general direction of foliation of the district. The junction with the auriferous series cannot be seen. From the photo reproduced by Campbell, it appears that there are similar conglomerates at Norseman.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 210 note 1 Geological Map of the Kalgoorlie Goldfield, Maitland, A. G. and Campbell, W. D., Perth, 1902Google Scholar.

page 210 note 2 Bull, , xxi, pp. 33–5, 1906Google Scholar.

page 210 note 3 Loe. cit., fig. 10.

page 211 note 1 A. Gibb Maitland, Bull, , xx, pp. 57–61, 1905Google Scholar; Bull, , xxiii, pp. 77, 79, 1906Google Scholar.

page 211 note 2 Bull, , xx, pp. 2830, 1905Google Scholar; Bull, , xxiii, pp. 77–9, 1906Google Scholar.

page 211 note 3 Maitland, Bull, , xxxiii, pp. 42–5, 66–7, 75–6, 99100, 1909Google Scholar.

page 211 note 4 Maitland, Bull, , xv, pp. 10, 11, 25, etc., 1904Google Scholar; Bull, , xx, pp. 23–8, 1905Google Scholar; Bull, . xxiii, pp. 40–3, 77–8, 1906Google Scholar; Bull, , xxvi, pp. 50–2, 1907Google Scholar.

page 211 note 5 Bull, , xx, pp. 24–5, 1905Google Scholar.

page 214 note 1 Trans. Edin. Geol. Soo., vol. vii, p. 181Google Scholar.

page 214 note 2 Econ. Geol., vol. i, p. 530, 1906Google Scholar.

page 215 note 1 Some confusion exists as to whether the section described really belongs to 2286, owing to a mistake in labelling by the lapidary.

page 215 note 2 Cf. Bull, , xxxvii, pp. 1415, 1909Google Scholar.

page 216 note 1 Holmquist, J. P., “Studien über die Granite von Schweden”: Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, vol. vii, p. 116, 1904–5Google Scholar.