Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:51:19.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—On the Close of the Highland Controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Charles Lapworth
Charles Lapworth
Affiliation:
Mason Science College, Birmingham.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All those British geologists who have interested themselves in the long-vexed question of the geological position and true mode of origin of the Metamorphic rocks of the Highlands of Scotland must have read with the greatest interest and pleasure the clear and vivid “Report on the Geology of the North-West of Sutherland,” by Messrs. Peach and Horne, in the pages of “Nature” for November last; and the manly and candid Introductory Observations by the Director-General of the Geological Survey. Not only does the publication of this Report put an end to one of the most keenly agitated controversies in the history of British Geology, but it explains and harmonizes the diverse views of the contending parties. The issue appears to me to be most creditable to all concerned. For many years the Highland controversy has appeared to outsiders, and to those geologists who were unaware of the difficulties attending the stratigraphy of the older rocks, as a trivial dispute between the Geological Survey on the one hand and a few misguided amateurs on the other.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , March 1885 , pp. 97 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1885

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 97 note 1 Nature, 1884, vol. xxxi. p. 29.Google Scholar

page 98 note 1 See Geol. Mag. Decade II. Vol. X. 1883, pp. 120, 193, and 337.Google Scholar

page 99 note 1 Nicol, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1856, p. 20, etc.Google ScholarHicks, , Q.J.G.S. 1878, p. 813.Google ScholarCallaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 358, etc.Google ScholarLapworth, , Geol. Mag. 1883, p. 123, etc.Google Scholar

page 99 note 2 Lapworth, , Geol. Mag. 1883, p. 126Google Scholar, etc. Callaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 358, etc.Google Scholar

page 99 note 3 Nicol, , Q.J.G.S. 1861, p. 88, etc.Google ScholarCallaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1881, p. 244.Google ScholarLapworth, , Geol. Mag. 1883, p. 127.Google Scholar

page 99 note 4 Nicol, , Q.J.G.S. 1861, p. 91, etc.Google ScholarHudleston, , Geol. Mag. 1882, p. 394.Google ScholarLapworth, , Geol. Mag. 1883, p. 127.Google ScholarCallaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 367.Google Scholar

page 99 note 5 Nicol, , Q.J.G.S. 1861, p. 86.Google Scholar Hicks, ibid. 1883, p. 157. Callaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 357.Google ScholarLapworth, , Geol. Mag. 1883, p. 127.Google Scholar

page 100 note 1 Lapworth, , Geol. Mag. 1883, p. 127.Google ScholarCallaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 407.Google ScholarCompare Hicks, , 1880, Geol. Mag. p. 21.Google Scholar

page 100 note 2 Nicol, , Q.J.G.S. 1861, p. 86.Google ScholarCallaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 357, etc.Google ScholarHicks, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 157.Google ScholarLapworth, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 421.Google Scholar

page 100 note 3 Callaway, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 410.Google ScholarLapworth, , loc. cit.Google ScholarCompare Nicol, , Q.J.G.S. 1861, p. 110Google Scholar, and Hicks, , Geol. Mag. 1880, p. 17.Google Scholar

page 100 note 4 Nicol, , Q.J.G.S. 1861, pp. 87, 88.Google Scholar Callaway, ibid. 1881, p. 241. Lapworth, see Appendix.

page 100 note 5 Lapworth, , 1884, see Appendix, p. 104.Google Scholar

page 100 note 6 Nicol, , Q.J.G.S. 1861, p 95.Google Scholar Hicks, ibid. 1878, p. 818, etc. etc.

page 100 note 7 Bonney, Hudleston, Proc. Geol. Assoc. 1879, p. 75; Q.J.G.S. 1880, p. 95.Google Scholar Callaway, ibid. 1883, p. 410.

page 100 note 8 Lapworth, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 422, etc.Google Scholar

page 100 note 9 Compare Bonney, , Q.J.G.S. 1880, p. 95, etc.Google Scholar

page 100 note 10 Lapworth, , 1884, see Appendix, p. 103.Google Scholar

page 100 note 11 Lapworth, , 1884, loc. cit.Google Scholar Compare also Bonney, , Q.J.G.S. 1883, p. 415, etc.Google Scholar

page 101 note 1 Lapworth, , loc. cit. 1884.Google Scholar

page 101 note 2 Compare Hicks, , 1883, Q.J.G.S. p. 147.Google Scholar

page 101 note 3 Lapworth, 1884, ibid. p. 104.

page 101 note 4 Lapworth, 1884, ibid. p. 105.

page 101 note 5 Heim, , Mechanismus der Gebirgshildung, Basel, 1878.Google Scholar

page 101 note 6 Lehmann, , Entstehung der Altkrystallinischen Schiefergesteine, Bonn, 1884.Google Scholar

page 103 note 1 Read at Ordinary Meeting of Geologists' Association, 07 4th, 1884.

page 103 note 2 The communication is printed as read. A few words have been added by Prof. Lapworth for the sake of clearness of description. These are given in brackets.—J. J. H. TEALL.

page 105 note 1 (i.e. the heterogeneous materials of which it is composed have undergone re-arrangement, and have received a new and a common set of petrological features, through the agency of the great Earth-mill).