Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:28:44.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—On Eryon Antiquus, Broderip, sp., from the Lower Lias, Lyme-Regis, Dorset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Henry Woodward
Henry Woodward
Affiliation:
British Museum (Natural History).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

So far back as the year 1820, Schlotheim described in his Petrefactenkunde, vol. i. p. 37, certain Oolitic Crustacea from Solenhofen, which he called Macrourites; but forms belonging to more than one genus were included by him under this name.

We are indebted to M. Desmarest, in 1822, for the earliest description of the genus Eryon from the Lithographic Stone of Solenhofen

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 5 , Issue 10 , October 1888 , pp. 433 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1888

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 433 note 1 Nat. Hist. Foss. Crust. 1822, p. 128.Google Scholar

page 433 note 2 Trans. Geol. Soc. 1835, 2nd ser. vol. v. p. 172, pl. 12, figs. 1 and 2.Google Scholar

page 433 note 3 Bronn, Jahrb. 1836, p. 329.Google Scholar

page 433 note 4 Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1849, p. 172.Google Scholar

page 433 note 5 Petrefactenkunde, 1822, p. 35, tab. 3, fig. 2.Google Scholar

page 433 note 6 Beitrage zur Petrefk. 1839, vol. ii. p. 2.Google Scholar

page 433 note 7 Etallon, in Bullet, . Soc. Geol. de Fr. 1858, xvi. p. 169, t. 4, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar

page 433 note 8 Germar, in Keferstein, . Deutschl. 1827, iv. p. 99.Google Scholar

page 433 note 9 Württemb. naturw. Jahresh. 1855, xi. Jahrg. p. 94.Google Scholar

page 433 note 10 Pal. Mittheil. 1862, p. 8, tabs. 1–3.Google Scholar

page 433 note 11 Pal. Mittheil. 1862, p. x. t. 1, fig. 1.Google Scholar

page 433 note 12 Bull. Soc. Linn, de Normandie, 1864, tome viii. p. 89, pl. vi.Google Scholar

page 433 note 13 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1866, vol. xxiii. p. 493, pl. xxiv. and xxv.Google Scholar

page 433 note 14 Geol. Mag. 1881, p. 529, Pl. XIV. Fig. 2.Google Scholar

page 433 note 15 Geol. Mag. 1881, p. 530, Pl. XIV. Fig. 1.Google Scholar

page 434 note 1 Bull. Soc. Linn. de Normandie, 1883, sér. 3, tome vii. pp. 1–10, pl. i.-iii.Google Scholar

page 434 note 2 Geol. Mag. 1884, Dec. III. Vol. I. PL. X. p. 307.Google Scholar

page 436 note 1 The genus Eryon was founded by Desmarest on specimens from Solenhofen which have no diceresis in the tail-fan.

page 437 note 1 In the recent forms described by Mr. Spence-Bate the eye was found to be almost entirely concealed beneath the antero-lateral angle of the carapace, see woodcut of ophthalmopod of Pentacheles gracilis (“Challenger” Report, or Crustacea-Machoura, vol. xxiv. p. 114, fig. 28; also vol. xxiv. plate xvii. figs. C a, C ii. a, Cm. a.)Google Scholar