Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The following account of the Proboscidea, by Prof. E. D. Cope, appeared in a recent number of the “American Naturalist” and is so interesting, that we venture to give the more important part in full, and some few of the illustrations.—Edit. Geol. Mag.
page 438 note 1 No. 268, April 1889, pp. 191–211, pl. ix.–xvi. and nine woodcuts.
page 439 note 1 Gen. nov. type, Elephas Cliftii, Falc. & Cautl. (Mastodon elephantoides, Clift).
page 440 note 1 Catalogue of Fossil Mammalia in the Brit. Mus., pt. iv. p. 72.
page 440 note 2 In compiling this list I have been greatly aided by the Memoirs of Lydekker in the “Palæontologia Indica” and the Catalogue of the British Museum.
page 440 note 3 M. proævus, Cope, 1884, not 1873.
page 440 note 4 According to Lydekker no premolars have been seen in this species.
page 440 note 5 M? floridanus, Leidy.
page 440 note 6 M. andium, Cuv. According to the recent researches of Burmeister, this species does not possess mandibular tusks (Sitzungsb, . Kön. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Berlin, 1888, p. 717.)Google Scholar Hence the specimen from Mexico with such tusks, reported by Falconer, must be assigned elsewhere.
page 440 note 7 This species is said by Lydekker not to possess premolars. Leidy, Report U.S. Geol. Surv. Terrs. Pl., figures a tooth as a premolar, and similar specimens are not uncommon.
page 440 note 8 According to Lydekker, premolars have not been observed.
page 441 note 1 Mastodon, Clift.; Stegodon, Falc.; Elephas, Lyd.
page 443 note 1 From the American Naturalist, 1884, p. 524.Google Scholar
page 446 note 1 Extinct Mammalia of Dakota and Nebraska, p. 398.
page 448 note 1 Mon. Pal. Soc. 1879, Brit. Foss. Elephants, p. 69, pl. vi. and vii.Google Scholar