Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The specimen herein to be considered is one of great historical interest, for it was the first specimen of an Edrioasteroid made known to science. It was discovered by Dr. J. J. Bigsby in limestone now recognised as of Lower Trenton age, forming Table Rock at the Chaudière Falls on the Ottawa River at Ottawa (then called Bytown). Canada, in 1822. Brought by Bigsby to England, it was figured and described, though not named, by G. B. Sowerby in 1825. E. Forbes, who had the speciman for study, referred to it in his memoir “On the Cystideæ of the Silurian Rocks of the British Islands,” since the “aspect” of his Agelacrinites Buchianus “immediately called [it] to mind”; he even went so far as to say that there could “be no question … of its being generically allied” to that species. Considering the not unnatural inadequacy of Sowerby's description and figure, the reputation that Forbes had as an authority on echinoderms, and the comparative imperfection of the first found specimens of Edrioaster, it was not surprising that E. Billings in 1856 should have supposed a new Trenton fossil, undoubtedly congeneric with Agelacrinites Buchianus, to be of the same species as that found by Bigsby and should therefore have applied to it the trivial name ‘Bigsbyi,’ while giving to a fossil of obviously different structure the name ‘Agelacrinites Dicksoni.’ In February, 1858, Billings travelled to London with the fossils in question, and found that Bigsby's specimen was not, after all, the same as his Cyclaster Bigsbyi, but was specifically identical with his A. Dicksoni. He redescribed the species, and had his type-specimen, as well as Bigsby's fossil, figured by C.R. Bone.
Studies I and II were published in the Geological Magazine for December, 1898, and may, 1900. Publication of the present Study, written in 1899, was delayed owing to an unwillingness to load Zoology with a new generic name without further confirmation from all available evidence. Since that date so much Edrioasteriod material has passed through my hands that the publication of these Studies is resumed with more confidence.
page 543 note 2 “Notice of a Fossil belonging to the Class Radiaria, found by Dr. Bigsby in Canada”: Zool. Journ., vol. ii, pp. 318–20, pl. xi, fig. 5; London, 10, 1825.Google Scholar
page 543 note 3 Mem. Geol. Surv. Gt. Brit., vol. ii, pt. ii, 1848Google Scholar; see pp. 519 and 520.
page 543 note 4 Rep. Progress Geol. Surv. Canada, 1853–6, p.292; Toronto, Autumn of 1857.
page 543 note 5 Op. cit., p.294.
page 543 note 6 Canadian Organic Remains, dec. iii, p. 84, pl. viii, figs. 3 and 3a (the holotype), 4 and 4a (Bigsby's specimen).
page 547 note 1 Should it ever be proved that Bigsby's specimen is of a different species, it will have to receive a new name; and that new species must then be taken as the genotype of Lebetodiscus.
page 548 note 1 See the diagrams and brief account of Edrioaster Bigsbyi in “A Treatise on Zoology,” ed. E. Ray, Lankester, vol. iii, Echinoderma, p. 209Google Scholar. Also F. A. Bather, “what is an Echinoderm?” 1901, and Encycl. Brit. Suppl., Art. Echinodermata, 1902.
page 550 note 1 Lěbētodiscus, from λέβης, a cauldron; after the Chaudière Falls; and δlσkoς, a round plate.
page 550 note 2 But see footnote 1, ante, p. 547.