Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:43:36.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—Some Points in the Geology of Anglesey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

I do not hesitate to say that Dr. Eoberts could not have written the letter which appears in this Magazine for December, 1881, if he had read my papers on Anglesey with care. Not only does he confound together things which I have expressly made to differ, but he attributes to me opinions which never existedineither my thoughts or my writings. I must remove some of these misapprehensions, before discussing the real questions in dispute.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1882

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 55 note 1 GEOL. MAG. 02, 1880, p. 118.Google Scholar

page 55 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxvii. p. 223.Google Scholar

page 55 note 3 Incorrectly printed “limestone.”

page 57 note 1 GEOL. MAG. 02, 1881, p. 197.Google Scholar