Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
I had not intended to reply to Professor Holmes's recent paper in the Geological Magazine, but the apparent confusion of mind which exists about the question of contrasted differentiation has led me to do so.
page 529 note 1 Holmes, A., Geol. Mag., LXXIII, 1936, 228–238. (In case any reader should be searching for the source of the quotation under the title of Holmes's paper, I ought perhaps to remark that it was taken by him from some unpublished notes on the eastern end of the Newry igneous complex which were sent to Miss Reynolds, after an excursion held there last August.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 530 note 1 Kennedy, W. Q., Amer. Journ. Sci., xxv, 1933, 241.Google Scholar
page 530 note 2 Kennedy, W. Q., op. cit., 241–2.Google Scholar
page 530 note 3 Kennedy, W. Q., op. cit., 249.Google Scholar
page 530 note 4 Tyrrell, G. W., The Principles of Petrology, London, 1926, 148.Google Scholar
page 531 note 1 Bowen, N. L., The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks, Princeton, 1928, 91.Google Scholar
page 531 note 2 Bowen, N. L., op. cit., 73.Google Scholar
page 531 note 3 Holmes, A. and Harwood, H. F., Min. Mag., xxi, 1926–1928, 537.Google Scholar
page 532 note 1 Tyrrell, G. W., op. cit., 155.Google Scholar
page 532 note 1 Bowen, N. L., op. cit., 56.Google Scholar
page 533 note 1 F., Walker, Min. Mag., xxiv, 1935, 152.Google Scholar
page 533 note 2 Holmes, A. and Harwood, H. F., op. cit., 537.Google Scholar
page 533 note 3 Tomkeieff, S. I., Min. Mag., xxii, 1929–1931, 110.Google Scholar
page 534 note 1 Ward, J. C., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxii, 1876, 30.Google Scholar