Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:46:34.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hypostomes of Some Girvan Trilobites and their Relationship to the Cephala

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

James L. Begg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Palaeozoic rocks of the Girvan district have long been known for their rich faunal content, which has been studied by many palaeontologists. Trilobites are so abundant that they have been dealt with in a special monograph by Reed (1903−6). Since the publication of the monograph, however, continued collecting has made possible the description of further species and the amplification of many of the original descriptions; much of this has been accomplished by the publication of three supplements to Reed's monograph. The present paper is devoted to a consideration of the hypostomes of some Girvan trilobites. Professor A. E. Trueman has taken a keen interest in its preparation, and I desire to thank him for his very valuable assistance in correcting and improving the text; I must acknowledge again my indebtedness to Dr. F. R. C. Reed for the loan of literature.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 1943 , pp. 56 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Begg, J. L., 1939. Some New Species of Proetidae and Otarionidae from the Ashgillian of Girvan. Geol. Mag., lxxvi, 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begg, J. L., 1940. A Note on the Genera Staurocephalus and Sphaerocoryphe. Geol. Mag., lxxvii, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elles, G. L., 1923. Evolutional Palaeontology in Relation to the Lower Palaeozoic Rocks. Report Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Liverpool, 83–107.Google Scholar
Novák, O., 1885. Studien an Hypostomen bohmischer Trilobiten, Nro. III. Sitzber. d. kgl. bohm. gesellsch. Wiss.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E., 1913. In Eastman's Translation of Zittel's Textbook of Palaeontology, vol. i, ed. 1, New York, 692–709.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1904. Lower Palaeozoic Trilobites of the Girvan District, Ayrshire, Mon. Palaeont. Soc., London, part 2, 46–96, pls. vii–xiii.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1906. Mon. Palaeont. Soc., pt. 3, 97–186, pls. xiv–xx.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1914. Mon. Palaeont. Soc., suppl. 1, 1–56, pls. i–viii.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1931. Mon. Palaeont. Soc., suppl. 2, 1–30.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1931. Additional New Species of Trilobites from Girvan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 10, vii.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1935. Lower Palaeozoic Trilobites of the Girvan District, suppl. 3, 1–64, pls. i–iv.Google Scholar
Richter, R., 1932. Crustacea, in Handwörterbuch der Naturwissenschaften, Jena, 840–863.Google Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J., 1936. Cephalic Sutures and their Bearing on Current Classification of Trilobites, Biological Reviews, xi, 407–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittard, W. F., 1938. The Upper Valentian Trilobites of Shropshire. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 11, i, 85–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar