Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:36:28.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homological variability of archaeocyathans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. Yu Rozanov
A. Yu Rozanov
Affiliation:
Geological InstituteAcademy of Science of the U.S.S.R.Moscow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The history of the study of homological variation in the archaeocyathans is reviewed and some morphological details defined. Homological variability is considered at generic and familial level and a new detailed table of the homological series at generic level is presented.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 111 , Issue 2 , March 1974 , pp. 107 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beljaeva, G. W. 1969. New archaeocyatheans of the Dgagdy mountains. In: Biostratigraphy and palaeontology of the Lower Cambrian of the Sibiria and Far East. Izdat ‘Nauka’, Moskva.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. 1964. Archaeocyatha. Contribution à l'étude des faunas cambriennes du Maroc de Sardaigne et de France. Notes Mém. serv. geol. Maroc. 179. Rabat.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. 1969. Lower Cambrian Archaeocyatha from the Ajax mine, Beltana, South Australia. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geology), 17, 7.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. 1970. A revision of Australia genera of Archaeocyatha. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 94.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Rozanov, A. Yu. 1972. On annular outer-wall structures of the archaeocyatheans. In Biostratigraphy and palaeontology of the Lower Cambrian of the Sibiria and Far East. Izdat ‘Nauka’, Moskva.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Voronin, Yu. I. 1971. Significance of septal perforation for classification of Ajacicyathidae. Paleont. Zh. 3.Google Scholar
Erlich, P. R. & Holm, R. W. 1963. The process of evolution. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1955. Archaeocyathi. In Atlas of the characteristic forms of the fauna and flora of West Sibiria.Google Scholar
Lipina, O. A. 1971. N. I. Vavilov's law of a homological series in application to foraminifera. Bull. Moip, geol., 46, 2.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1965. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okuneva, O. G. 1969. Biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian Far East (Spassk and Tahernigov regions). In Biostratigraphy and palaeontology of the Lower Cambrian of the Sibiria and Far East. Izdat ‘Nauka’, Moskva.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1963. Some aspects of the evolution of the Archaeocyatha (Regularia). Paleont. Zh. 1, 3–12.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1969. Some aspects of the systematics of the Archaeocyatha. In Biostratigraphy and palaeontology of the Lower Cambrian of the Sibiria and Far East. Izdat ‘Nauka’, Moskva.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1971. Homologous and its significance for studying the evolution of the Archaeocyatha. Materials of III Archaeocyatha Coll. Moscow, 1970.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. & Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1966. The biostratigraphy and fauna of the lower horizons of the Cambrian. Izdat ‘Nauka’, Moskva.Google Scholar
Simon, W. 1939. Archaeocyathacea. Senckenberischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft. Abh. 448. Frankfurt/Mein.Google Scholar
Simon, W. 1941. Archaeocyathacea: II, Senckenbergiane, 23, Frankfurt/Mein.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. G. 1910. The Archaeocyathidae from the Cambrian of South Australia with an account of the morphology and affinities of the whole class. Mem. R. Soc. S. Aust. 2, 2.Google Scholar
Vavilov, N. I. 1935. The law of homologous series in variation. Moscow, Leningrad.Google Scholar
Vologdin, A. G. 1956. Classification of Archaeocyatha. Dokl. (Proc.) Acad. Sci. USSR, 3,4.Google Scholar
Voronin, Yu. I. 1969. Systematic position of genera Cadniacyathus Bedf. R. et J. 1937 and Inessocyathus Debrenne, 1964. In Biostratigraphy and palaeontology of the Lower Cambrian of the Sibiria and Far East. Izdat ‘Nauka’, Moskva.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1960. Archaeocyathi of the Sibirian Platform. Izdat Akad. Nauk, Moskva.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1968. Archarocyathi. In: Datzenko, V. A., and others: ‘Biostratigraphy and fauna of the Cambrian of the North-Western Sibirian platform.’ Trans NIIGA 155.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1971. Morphology and the system of the Ethmophyllidae. Materials of III Archaeocyatha Coll. Moscow, 1970.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., Korshunov, V. I. & Rozanov, A. Yu. 1969. Type section of the Atdabanian stage and its palaeontological evidence (on Archaeocyathacea). In: Biostratigraphy and palaeontology of the Lower Cambrian of the Sibiria and Far East.Izdat ‘Nauka’, Moskva.Google Scholar