Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:08:19.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Geology of Jebel Usdum, Dead Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

B. K. N. Wyllie
Affiliation:
Geologist, Anglo-Persian Oil Company.

Summary

The salt of Jebel Usdum is not a product of the Pleistocene Dead Sea, nor of the lake which preceded it (in ? Pliocene time), the waters of which were fresh for a long period and deposited sediments, with a maximum thickness of 1,000 feet or more, which are younger than the salt.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 369 note 1 A stronger tradition seems to attach Lot's name to pinnacles of calcsinter which have been formed along the eastern rift-fault, on the Transjordan side, some distance south of Wadi Mojib. These are called Mart Lut, Bint Lut, and Kelb Lut (Lot's Wife, Daughter, and Dog).

page 372 note 1 King, W. B. R., “Cambrian Fossils from the Dead Sea”: Geol. Mag., LX, 1923, 507–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 372 note 2 Cox, L. R., “A Triassic Fauna from the Jordan Valley”: Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., xiv, 1924, 5296Google Scholar. Idem, “A Bajocian-Bathonian Outcrop in the Jordan Valley”: ibid., xv, 1925, 169–81.

page 372 note 3 H. Muir-Wood, “Jurassic Brachiopoda from the Jordan Valley”: ibid., xv, 1925, 181–92. The collections described in these papers by King, Cox, and Muir-Wood were all made by the writer and his colleagues, K. A. Campbell and George M. Lees.