Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:00:45.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The genus Biplanispira Umbgrove (Foraminiferida) and its occurrence in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Bimal K. Samanta
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Calcutta 700019, India

Abstract

Biplanispira Umbgrove is closely related to Pellatispira Boussac, from which it probably arose by the subdivision of the median chambers by the rapidly expanding marginal crest and the development of planispirally arranged secondary chambers on both sides of the peripheral flange. The genus appears to be polyphyletic, its species having been derived from different representatives of Pellatispira. Illustrated records of Biplanispira are confined to the region between eastern India and Eua, Tonga, and the genus appears to be restricted to the middle and upper parts of the Upper Eocene. In the Upper Eocene of the Garo Hills, eastern India, it is represented by B. hoffmeisteri (Whipple) and in the Andaman Islands by B. mirabilis (Umbgrove). This is the first record of the genus from mainland India.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. G., 1967. Tertiary Formanifera in the Tethyan, American and Indo-Pacific Provinces. In Aspects of Tethyan Biogeography (ed. Adams, C. G. and Ager, D. V.), pp. 195217. Systematics Association Publication, no. 7. London.Google Scholar
Adams, C. G., 1970. A reconsideration of the East Indian Letter classification of the Tertiary. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 19 (3), 85137.Google Scholar
Adams, C. G., 1973. Some Tertiary foraminifera. In Atlas of Palaeobiogeography (ed. Hallam, A.), pp. 453–68. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Beets, C., 1949. On the occurrence of Biplanispira in the uppermost Eocene (Kyet-U-Bok Band) of Burma. Geologie en Mijnbouw Jaarg. no. 7, 229–32, fig. 1.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S., 1957 a. Larger foraminifera [of Saipan]. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 280–I, 321–60, pls 94–118.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S., 1957 b. Larger foraminifera from Eniwetok drill holes. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 260–V, 743–84 pls 230–49.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S., 1960. Upper Eocene and Oligocene larger foraminifera from Viti Levu, Fiji. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 374–A, 17, pls 1–3.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S., 1963. Tertiary larger foraminifera from Guam. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 403–E, 128, pls 1–11.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S., 1970. Larger foraminifera of late Eocene age from Eua, Tonga. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 640–B, 115, pls 1–3.Google Scholar
Cole, W. S., & Bridge, J., 1953. Geology and larger foraminifera of Saipan Island. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 253, 145, pls 1–15.Google Scholar
Crespin, I., 1938. The occurrence of Lacazina and Biplanispira in the Mandated Territory of New Guinea. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, Bulletin 3, 38, pls 1–2.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A., 1948. Foraminifera, Their Classification and Economic Use, 4th ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 605 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghose, B. K., 1972. The morphology of Pellatispira glabra with comments on the taxonomy, distribution and evolution of the genus. Revue de Micropaléontologie 15, 149–62, pls 1–2.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F., 1945. Principles of Micropalaeontology. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. 296 pp.Google Scholar
Gururaja, M. N., & Rao, B. R. J., 1976. Upper Eocene foraminifera from South Andaman Island. Proceedings of the Vlth Indian Colloquium on Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy, 122–5, pls 1–2.Google Scholar
Hanzawa, S., 1937. Notes on some interesting Cretaceous and Tertiary Foraminifera from the West Indies. Journal of Paleontology 11, 110–17.Google Scholar
Hanzawa, S., 1957. Cenozoic foraminifera of micronesia. Memoir of the Geological Society of America 66, 1165, pls 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanzawa, S., 1962. Upper Cretaceous and Tertiary three layered larger foraminifera and their allied forms. Micropaleontology 8, 129–86, pls 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, J. R., 1981. Foraminifera. London: Macmillan. 433 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hottinger, L., 1978. Comparative anatomy of elementary shell structures in selected larger foraminifera. Foraminifera 3, 203–66.Google Scholar
Hottinger, L., & Luetenegger, S., 1980. The structure of calcarinid foraminifera. Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen 101, 115–27, pls 1–12.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr, & Tappan, H., 1964. Sarcodina, chiefly ‘Thecamoebians’ and Foraminiferida. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part C, protista 2 (ed. Moore, R. C.), pp. C1C900. New York: Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Reiss, Z., 1963. Reclassification of perforate Foraminifera. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Israel 35, 1111, pls 1–8.Google Scholar
Samanta, B. K., 1965. Discocyctina from the Upper Eocene of Assam, India. Micropaleontology 11, 415–30, pls 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanta, B. K., 1969. Eocene planktonic foraminifera from the Garo Hills, Assam, India. Micropaleontology 15, 325–50, pls 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samanta, B. K., 1983. Pellatispira (Foraminiferida) from the Upper Eocene of Surat-Broach, Gujarat. Journal of the Geological Society of India 24, 254–61.Google Scholar
Sigal, J., 1952. Foraminiferes. In Traité de Paléontologie, tome I (ed. Piveteau, J.), pp. 133301. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Smout, A. H., 1955. Reclassification of the Rotaliidea (Foraminifera) and two new Cretaceous forms resembling Elphidium. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 45, 201–10.Google Scholar
Tan, S. H., 1936 a. Over verschillende paleontologische criteria voor de geleding van het Tertiair. De Ingenieur Nederlandsch-Indië 3 (Mijnbouw en Geologie), pp. 173–9.Google Scholar
Tan, S. H., 1936 b. Zur Kenntnis der Lepidocycliniden. Natuurkennis Toijdschrift van Nederlandsch-Indië 46, 235–80.Google Scholar
Umbgrove, J. H. F., 1936. Heterospira, a new foraminiferal genus from the Tertiary of Borneo. Leidsche Geologische Mededeelingen 8, 155–9.Google Scholar
Umbgrove, J. H. F., 1937. A new name for the foraminiferal genus Heterospira. Leidsche Geologische Mededeelingen 8, 309.Google Scholar
Umbgrove, J. H. F., 1938. A second species of Biplanispira from the Eocene of Borneo. Leidsche Geologische Mededeelingen 10, 82–9.Google Scholar
van Bemmelen, R. W., 1949. The Geology of Indonesia, vol. 1 A. The Hague: Government Printing Office. 732 pp.Google Scholar
van Der Vlerk, I. M., 1955. Correlation of the Tertiary of the Far East and Europe. Micropaleontology 1, 72–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, G. L., 1932. Eocene Foraminifera. In Geology of Eua, Tonga (Hoffmeister, J. E.), Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 96, 7990, pls 20–22.Google Scholar