Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:37:09.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facies Changes versus Sliding—A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. G. Hardie
W. G. Hardie
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University, Edgbaston, Birmingham, 15.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In my recent paper on the Lochaber Series (Hardie, 1952), I gave detailed facts about the lithology of several of the stratigraphical units, and I concluded that the remarkable thickness variations were due to original sedimentary processes rather than to mechanical rearrangement. Sir Edward Bailey, in his paper in this current number of the Geological Magazine, strongly disagrees with my views, and argues in favour of sliding. In reply I would like to make the following three points.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 114 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, E. B., 1934. West Highland Tectonics: Loch Leven to Glen Roy. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xc, 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, E. B., 1938. Eddies in Mountain Structure. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xciv, 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, W. G., 1952. The Lochaber Series of Loch Leven, Argyllshire. Geol. Mag., lxxxix, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar