Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T04:09:04.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Gryphaea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

G. M. Philip
G. M. Philip
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The coiling of the Liassic oyster Gryphaea is discussed and the assessment of tightness of coiling investigated. Hence Hallam's (1960a, b) statistical work on Gryphaea is interpreted and from his original measurements a highly significant increase in thetightness of coiling is demonstrated in the Gryphaeas of the higher Sinemurian horizons of Britain. The presence of a strong natural selection pressure favourable to more tightly coiled individuals of the communities is indicated, and the nature of the lineage discussed. It is suggested that recent criticisms of Trueman's work lack foundation.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 99 , Issue 4 , August 1962 , pp. 327 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cain, A. J., and Sheppard, P. M., 1952. The effects of natural selection on body colour in the land snail. Capaea nemoralis. Heredity, 6, 217–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A., 1959a. On the supposed evolution of Gryphaea in the Lias. Geol. Mag., 96, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A., 1959b. The supposed evolution of Gryphaea. ibid., 96, 419–420.Google Scholar
Hallam, A., 1960a. Stratigraphical studies in some Liassic rocks. (Ph.D. dissertation in the University of Cambridge.)Google Scholar
Hallam, A., 1960b. On Gryphaea. Geol. Mag., 97, 518–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joysey, K. A., 1956. The nomenclature and comparison of fossil communities. In The species concept in palaeontology, ed. Sylvester-Bradley, P. C.. London: Systematics Assoc.Google Scholar
Joysey, K. A., 1959a. A review of the evolution of Gryphaea incurva. Proc. XVth Int. Congr. Zool., ii, 190–2.Google Scholar
Joysey, K. A., 1959b. The evolution of the Liassic oysters Ostrea-Gryphaea. Biol. Rer., 34, 297–332.Google Scholar
Joysey, K. A., 1960. On Gryphaea. Geol. Mag., 97, 522–4.Google Scholar
Maclennan, R. M., and Trueman, A. E., 1942. Variation in Gryphaea incurva (Sow.) from the Lower Lias of Loch Aline, Argyll. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, 61, 211–233.Google Scholar
Mathew, W. D., 1926. The evolution of the horse. A record and its interpretation. Quart. Rev. Biol, 1, 139–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, A. E., 1950. The form transformation of the abdomen of the female pea-crab Pinnotheres pisum Leach. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B, 137, 115–136.Google Scholar
Pfannenstiel, M., 1928. Organisation and Entwicklung der Gryphaen. Palaeobiologica, 1, 381–418.Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H., 1939. Palaeontology and the mechanics of evolution. Quart. Journ. geol. Soc. Lond., 95, xxxiii–lxx.Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H., 1959. Concerning Mr. A. Hallam's article on Gryphaea. Geol. Mag., 96, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueman, A. E., 1922. The use of Gryphaea in the correlation of the lower Lias, ibid., 59, 256–268.Google Scholar