Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:01:45.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Earth's Thermal History, and Some Related Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Harold Jeffreys
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It seems to be curiously difficult to obtain fair treatment for the theory of a continuously cooling earth and its consequence, the thermal contraction theory of mountain formation. After Davison and Darwin had calculated the available compression of the earth's crust on Kelvin's theory of the cooling of the earth, and obtained a result that was at any rate of an order of magnitude consistent with the observations then available, Osmond Fisher made a revised comparison, which amounted to supposing the mountains formed by compression all powdered and spread out uniformly over the whole surface of the earth; the thickness of the resulting layer was naturally very much less than the actual height of known mountains. So far as I have been able to trace, nobody protested against the assumption that the thickness of the material after it had been redistributed in this way was directly comparable with the height of the mountains as actually distributed, and Osmond Fisher's view seems to have been universally quoted as the last word on the subject. Even long after my rediscussion of the whole question in 1916, making allowances for the additional data provided by radioactivity, had again led to a result agreeing with observation within the uncertainty of the data, it was almost completely neglected in the literature of the subject, while Osmond Fisher's work retained undisputed pre-eminence.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 63 , Issue 11 , November 1926 , pp. 516 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 517 note 1 Phil. Mag., vol. xxxii, 1916, 575–91.Google Scholar

page 517 note 2 Geol. Mag., July, 1926, p. 306.Google Scholar

page 517 note 3 The Earth, 1924, chap. x.Google Scholar

page 518 note 1 Am. Journ. Sci., vol. vii, 1924, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar

page 518 note 2 Nature, 1st May, 1926, pp. 620–1.Google Scholar

page 518 note 3 The Earth, pp. 140–3.Google Scholar

page 519 note 1 The Earth, p. 152.Google Scholar

page 520 note 1 Some Causes of Volcanic Activity, Franklin Inst., 1924.Google Scholar

page 520 note 2 Phil. Mag. (7), i, 1926, 923–31.Google Scholar

page 521 note 1 Geol. Mag., July, 1926, 301–5.Google Scholar

page 522 note 1 Geol. Mag., July, 1926, 306–29.Google Scholar

page 523 note 1 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., xii, 1926, 275–83.Google Scholar

page 524 note 1 Geol. Mag., February, 1915.Google Scholar

page 524 note 2 Nature, 29th November, 1924, p. 786.Google Scholar

page 524 note 3 Smithells, , Journ. Chem. Soc., xliii, 1883, 128.Google Scholar

page 524 note 4 Duboin, , Ann. d. Chimie (8), xvii, 356, 1909.Google Scholar