Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:38:32.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The earliest species of Burlingia Walcott, 1908 (Trilobita) from South China: biostratigraphical and palaeogeographical significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2014

JIN-LIANG YUAN  and
JORGE ESTEVE
JIN-LIANG YUAN
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China
JORGE ESTEVE*
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China Centre of Biology, Geosciences and Environment, University of West Bohemia, Klatovska, 51. 306 14. Pilsen, Czech Republic
*
†Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Burlingia balangensis sp. nov. from the lower Cambrian of South China represents the earliest species of this genus, and suggests that the genus may have originated in South China. A revision of the genus shows that B. primitiva and B. obscura can be used in order to indentify the base of the Cambrian Stage 5 when other trilobites are absent because their last appearance datum (LAD) coincides with the first appearance datum (FAD) of Oryctocephalus indicus. Available palaeogeographic and palaeoclimatic models suggest five major palaeocurrents during Cambrian times which could control the migration patterns of the Burlingia clade from South China to Baltica.

Keywords

PalaeozoicGondwanaGuizhou Provincepalaeogeographybiostratigraphy
Type
Rapid Communication
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 152 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 358 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abràmoff, M. D., Margalhães, P. J. & Ram, S. J. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11, 36–42.Google Scholar
Álvaro, J. J., Ahlberg, P., Babcock, L. E., Bordonaro, O. L., Choi, D. K., Cooper, R. A., Ergaliev, G. Kh., Gapp, I. W., Ghobadi Pour, M., Hughes, N. C., Jago, J. B., Korovnikov, I., Laurie, J. R., Lieberman, B. S., Paterson, J. R., Pegel, T. V., Popov, L. E., Rushton, A. W. A., Sukhov, S. S., Tortello, M. F., Zhou, Z. & Żylińska, A. 2013. Global Cambrian trilobite palaeobiogeography assessed using parsimony analysis of endemicity. In Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography (eds Harper, D. A. T. & Servais, T.), pp. 273–96. Geological Society of London, Memoirs no. 38.Google Scholar
Álvaro, J. J., Elicki, O., Geyer, G., Ruston, A. W. A. & Shergold, J. H. 2003. Palaeogeographical controls on the Cambrian trilobite immigration and evolutionary patterns reported in the western Gondwana margin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 195, 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvaro, J. J. & Vennin, E. 2001. Benthic marine communities recorded in the Cambrian Iberian Platform, NE Spain. Palaeontographica Abt. A 262, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvaro, J. J. & Vizcaïno, D. 1998. Stratigraphic signature of a terminal Early Cambrian regressive event in the Iberian Peninsula. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 35, 402–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvaro, J. J., Vizcaïno, D. & Vennin, E. 1999. Trilobite diversity patterns in the Middle Cambrian of southwestern Europe: a comparative study. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 151, 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocks, L. R. & Torsvik, T. H. 2005. Baltica from the late Precambrian to mid-Palaeozoic times: the gain and loss of a terrane's identity. Earth-Science Reviews 72, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbestad, J. O. R. & Budd, G. E. 2002. Burlingiid trilobites from Norway, with a discussion of their affinities and relationships. Palaeontology 45, 1171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. & Peel, J. S. 2011. The Henson Gletscher Formation, North Greenland, and its bearing on the global Cambrian Series 2–Series 3 boundary. Bulletin of Geosciences 86, 465–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. & Shergold, J. 2000. The quest for internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes 23, 188–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, J. B. 1972. Two new Cambrian trilobites from Tasmania. Palaeontology 15, 226–37.Google Scholar
Lazarenko, N. P. 1960. Arthropoda. Class Trilobita. In Novie Vjdy Drevnikh Rastenij i Becpozvonchiykh SSSR (ed. Markovsky, B. P.), pp. 211–55. Moscow: Akademiya Nauk SSSR (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lermontova, E. V. 1940. Class Trilobita. In Atlas of Characteristic Forms of the Fossil Faunas of the USSR (1) Cambrian (ed. Vologdin, A. G.), pp. 112–62. Moscow, Liningrad: Gosgeolizdat (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lin, J. P., Yuan, J. L., Wang, Y. & Zhao, Y. L. 2005. Introduction to the type section of the Kaili Formation, Danzhai, Guizhou Province, China. In Cambrian System of China and Korea, Guide to Field Excursions (eds Peng, S. C., Babcock, L. E. & Zhu, M. Y.), pp. 55–61. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press.Google Scholar
Lottes, A. I. & Rowley, D. B. 1990. Reconstruction of the Laurasian and Gondwana segments of Permian Pangaea. In Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography (eds McKerrow, W. S. & Scotese, C. R.), pp. 383–95. Geological Society of London, Memoirs no.12.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H. 1950. On the genus Redlichia, with description of its new species. Geological Review 15, 157–70 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H., Zhang, W. T., Qian, Y. Y., Zhu, Z. L., Lin, H. L., Zhou, Z. Y., Qian, Y., Zhang, S. G. & Wu, H. J. 1974. Cambrian trilobites. In A Handbook of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, Southwest China. (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica), pp. 82–102. Beijing Science Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
McKerrow, W. S., Scotese, C. R. & Brasier, M. D. 1992. Early Cambrian continental reconstructions. Journal of the Geological Society, London 149, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, J. C. 1903. Schmalenseeia amphionura, en ny trilobite-typ. Geologiske Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 25, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S., Babcock, L. E. & Cooper, R. A. The Cambrian Period. In The Geological Time Scale 2012 (eds Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M., Ogg, G.), pp. 438–88. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1951. Middle Cambrian stratigraphy and faunas of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 116, 1–277.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1910. The Cambrian Fossils of Spiti. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, Series 15, vol. 7, 1–70.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. & Babcock, L. E. 2011. Systematics, paleobiology, and taphonomy of some exceptionally preserved trilobites from Cambrian Lagerstätten of Utah. Paleontological Contributions 5, 1–46.Google Scholar
Rusthon, A. W. A. 1978. Fossils from the Middle-Upper Cambrian transition in the Nuneaton district. Palaeontology 21, 245–83.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R. 2004. A continental drift flipbook. Journal of Geology 112, 729–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servais, T., Danelian, T., Harper, D. A. T. & Munnecke, A. 2014. Possible oceanic circulation pattern, surface water currents and upwelling zones in the Early Palaeozoic. GFF 136, 229–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soloviev, I. A. 1969. Discovery of representatives of the genus Burlingia Walcott in the Amgan Stage of northern Siberia. Uchenye Zapiski Nauchno-Issledovatel’skikh Instituta Geologiska Arktika 26, 9–12 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 1994. Corynexochida and Ptychopariida (Trilobita, Arthropoda) of the Ehmaniella Biozone (Middle Cambrian), Utah and Nevada. Contributions in Science 446, 1–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, F. A., Zhao, Y. L, Yuan, J. L. & Lin, J. P. 2011. Detailed trilobite biostratigraphy across the proposed GSSP for Stage 5 (“Middle Cambrian” boundary) at the Wuliu-Zengjiayan section, Guizhou China. Bulletin of Geosciences 86, 423–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchernysheva, N. E. 1962. Cambrian trilobites of the Family Oryctocephalidae. In Problems of Oil and Gas Occurrence in the Soviet Arctic, Palaeontology and Biostratigraphy (ed. Shvedov, N. A.), pp. 3–64. Leningrad: Trudy Nauchnoissledovatel'skii Geologii Institut Arktiki (NIIGA) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Torsvik, T. H. & Cocks, L. R. M., 2013. New global palaeogeographical reconstructions for the Lower Palaeozoic and their generation. In Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography (eds Harper, D. A. T. & Servais, T.), pp. 5–24. Geological Society of London, Memoirs no. 38.Google Scholar
Torsvik, T. H & Reström, E. F. 2001. Cambrian palaeomagnetic data from Baltica: implications for true polar wander and Cambrian palaeogeography. Journal of the Geological Society, London 158, 321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 53, 13–52.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1936. Paradoxides oelandicus beds of Öland. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Series C 394, 1–66.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1994. Burlingiids: small proparian Cambrian trilobites of enigmatic origin. Palaeontology 37, 1–16.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Kelley, S. R. A. 1997. Morphological terms applied to Trilobita. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita, Revised (ed. Kaesler, R. L.), pp. 313–29. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America and Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, O. & Quinby-Hunt, M. S. 1991. Oceanography in the Ordovician. In Advances in Oceanic Geology (eds Barnes, C. R. & Williams, S. H.), pp. 283–98. Canadian Geological Survey Paper no 90–9.Google Scholar
Yang, X. L., Zhao, Y. L., Peng, J., Yang, Y. N. & Yang, K. D. 2010. Discovery of Oryctocephalid trilobites from the Tsinghsutung Formation (Duyunaian Stage, Qiandongian Series, Cambrian), Jianhe County, Guizhou Province. Geological Journal of China Universities 16, 309–16.Google Scholar
Yin, G. Z. & Lee, S. J. 1978. Trilobita. In Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China, Guizhou. Volume 1. Cambrian-Devonian (ed. Stratigraphical and Palaeontological Working Group of Guizhou Province), pp. 385–594. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yuan, J. L., Lin, J. P., Zhao, Y. L. & Peng, J. 2011. Zonation of the Balang and Wuxun (“Tsinghsutung”) formations and the lowermost part of the Kaili Formation (Cambrian Stage 4) based on oryctocephalid trilobites in Guizhou, South China. In Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada (eds Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A. & Foster, J. R.), pp. 314–15. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. L., Zhao, Y. L., Li, Y. & Huang, Y. Z. 2002. Trilobite Fauna of the Kaili Formation (Uppermost Lower Cambrian-Lower Middle Cambrian) from Southwestern Guizhou, South China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press (in Chinese with English summary), 422 pp.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. T., Lu, Y. H., Zhu, Z. L., Qian, Y. Y., Lin, H. L., Zhou, Z. Y., Zhang, S. G. & Yuan, J. L. 1980. Cambrian trilobite faunas of southwestern China. Palaeontologica Sinica, New Series B 159, 1–497 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Zhang, W. T., Yuan, K. X., Zhou, Z. Y., Qian, Y. & Wang, Z. Z. 1979. Cambrian of southwestern China. In Carbonate Biostratigraphy of Southwest China (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), pp. 39–107. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. L., Peng, J., Yuan, J. L., Babcock, L. E., Guo, Q. J., Yin, L. M., Yang, X. L., Tai, T. S., Wang, C. J., Lin, J. P., Gaines, R. R., Sun, H. J. & Yang, Y. N. 2012. Discussion of candidate stratotypes for the GSSP defining the conterminous base of Cambrian provisional Series 3 and Stage 5. Journal of Guizhou University (Natural Science) 29, 35–48.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. L., Yuan, J. L., Zhu, M. Y., Babcock, L. E., Peng, J., Wang, Y., Yang, X. L., Guo, Q. J., Yang, R. D. & Tai, T. S. 2005 a. Balang section, Guizhou, China: stratotype section for the Taijiangian Stage and candidate for GSSP of unnamed Cambrian series. In Cambrian System of China and Korea, Guide to Field Excursions (eds Peng, S. C., Babcock, L. E. & , M. Y. Zhu), pp. 62–83. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. L., Yuan, J. L., Zhu, M. Y., Babcock, L. E., Peng, J., Wang, Y., Yang, X. L., Guo, Q. J., Yang, R. D. & Tai, T. S. 2005 b. Kaili Biota: a taphonomic window on diversification of Metazoans from the basal Middle Cambrian: Guizhou, China. Acta Geologica Sinica 79, 751–65.Google Scholar