Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:19:17.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation problems in the Kimmeridge Clay Formation (Upper Jurassic, UK): lithostratigraphy versus biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

JOHN C. W. COPE
JOHN C. W. COPE*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, National Museum of Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A scheme of grouped lithostratigraphical units (‘beds’) proposed for the English Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation has been claimed to be also chronostratigraphical, but some of the resulting time-correlations conflict with those of the standard chronozonation based on ammonite biostratigraphy. Review of some critical ammonite species reaffirms the validity of the ammonite zonal scheme and shows that mismatching of lithologies (facies-correlations) has led to incorrect time-correlations. Because the numbering scheme of ‘beds’ was based on correlations of attenuated successions, it is on too coarse a time-scale to identify many non-sequences, and its usefulness as a chronostratigraphical tool is questioned. Evidence suggests that at least some calcareous concretions in the Kimmeridge Clay formed at shallow depths, which is relevant to discussions of the succession in terms of basin analysis.

Keywords

correlationlithostratigraphybiostratigraphychronostratigraphyKimmeridge Clay Formationconcretions
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 146 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 266 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkell, W. J. 1947 a. The geology of the country around Weymouth, Swanage, Corfe and Lulworth. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, xv + 386 pp., 19 pls.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1947 b. The geology of Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press, vi + 67 pp., 6 pls.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1963. Lexique Stratigraphique International, I. Europe, Fasc. 3a – Angleterre, Pays de Galles, Écosse – 3a X, Jurassique (eds Donovan, D. T. & Hemingway, J. E.). Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Blake, J. F. 1875. On the Kimmeridge Clay of England. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 31, 196–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. F. 1881. On correlation of the Kimmeridge and Portland rocks of England with those of the continent. Part 1. The Paris Basin. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 37, 497–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckman, S. S. 1922–23. Type Ammonites 4, 1–67, pls 268A–422. Published by the author. London & Thame.Google Scholar
Callomon, J. H. 1985. Biostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy and all that – again. In International Symposium on Jurassic Stratigraphy, Erlangen, September 1–8, 1984 (eds O. Michelsen & A. Zeiss), pp. 612–24. Geological Survey of Copenhagen [Dated 1984].Google Scholar
Callomon, J. H. 1995. Time from fossils: S. S. Buckman and Jurassic high-resolution geochronology. In Milestones in geology (ed. Le Bas, M. J.), pp. 127–50. Geological Society of London, Memoir no. 16.Google Scholar
Callomon, J. H. & Chandler, R. B. 1990. A review of the ammonite horizons of the Aalenian–Lower Bajocian Stages in the Middle Jurassic of southern England. In Atti del meeting sulla stratigrafia del Baiociano (eds S. Cresta & G. Pavia), pp. 85–11. Memorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica d'Italia 40.Google Scholar
Casey, R. 1967. The position of the Middle Volgian in the English Jurassic. Proceedings of the Geological Society of London 1640, 128–33.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. K. & Wignall, P. B. 1990. Early Kimmeridgian bivalves of southern England. Mesozoic Research 2, 97–149.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 1967. The palaeontology and stratigraphy of the lower part of the Upper Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Series 15, 1–79, pls 1–33.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 1974. The Upper Kimmeridgian ammonite faunas of the Wash area and a subzonal scheme for the lower part of the Upper Kimmeridgian. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Great Britain 47, 29–37, pls 1–3.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 1978. Ammonite faunas and stratigraphy of the upper part of the Upper Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset. Palaeontology 21, 469–534, pls 45–56.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 1993. The Bolonian Stage: an old answer to an old problem. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 28, 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 1996. The role of the Secondary Standard in stratigraphy. Geological Magazine 133, 107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 2006. Jurassic. In Geology of England and Wales, 2nd edition (eds Brenchley, P. J. & Rawson, P. F.), pp. 327–66. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. & Rawson, P. F. 1992. Late Kimmeridgian. Map J10. In Atlas of palaeogeography and lithofacies (eds Cope, J. C. W., Ingham, J. K. & Rawson, P. F.), p. 127. Geological Society of London, Memoir no. 13.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. & Zeiss, A. 1964. Zur Parallelisierung des englischen Oberkimmeridge mit dem fränkischen Untertithon (MalmMalm ζ). Geologisches Blätte für NordostBayern 14, 4–15.Google Scholar
Cox, B. M. & Gallois, R. W. 1979. Description of the standard stratigraphical sequences of the Upper Kimmeridge Clay, Ampthill Clay and West Walton Beds. Appendix B. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences, London 78/19, 68–72.Google Scholar
Cox, B. M. & Gallois, R. W. 1981. The stratigraphy of the Kimmeridge Clay of the Dorset type area and its correlation with some other Kimmeridgian sequences. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences, London 80/4, 1–44.Google Scholar
Cox, B. M., Gallois, R. W. & Sumbler, M. G. 1994. The stratigraphy of the BGS Hartwell Borehole, near Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 105, 209–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, B. M., Horton, A. & Sumbler, M. G. 1990. The Upper Kimmeridge Clay of the M40 motorway, east of Oxford. Proceedings of the Cotteswold Naturalists Field Club 36, 261–9.Google Scholar
Gallois, R. W. 2000. The stratigraphy of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation (Upper Jurassic) in the RGGE Project boreholes at Swanworth Quarry and Metherhills, south Dorset. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 111, 265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, R. W. & Cox, B. M. 1974. Stratigraphy of the Upper Kimmeridge Clay of the Wash area. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Great Britain 47, 1–28.Google Scholar
Gallois, R. W. & Cox, B. M. 1976. The stratigraphy of the Lower Kimmeridge Clay of eastern England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 41, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. P., Pearson, M. J., Trewin, N. H. & Fallick, A. E. 2006. Jurassic septarian concretions from NW Scotland record interdependent bacterial, physical and chemical processes of marine mudrock diagenesis. Sedimentology 53, 537–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselbo, S. P. & Palmer, T. J. 1992. Reworked early-diagenetic concretions and the bioerosional origin of a regional discontinuity within British Jurassic marine mudrocks. Sedimentology 39, 1045–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, A., Sumbler, M. G., Cox, B. M. & Ambrose, K. 1995. Geology of the country around Thame. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, x + 169 pp.Google Scholar
Ilovaisky, D. 1917. Les ammonites du Jurassique supérieur du pays de Liapine. (Ouvrages de la Section Géologique de la Société Impériale des Amis des Sciences Naturelles de Moscou.) Ouvrage 1. v + 180 pp., 14 pls, Moscow.Google Scholar
Melynk, D. H., Athersuch, J. & Smith, D. G. 1992. Estimating the dispersion of biostratigraphic events in the subsurface by graphic correlation: an example from the Late Jurassic of the Wessex Basin, UK. Marine and Petroleum Geology 19, 35–46.Google Scholar
Morgans-Bell, H. S., Coe, A. L., Hesselbo, S. P., Jenkyns, H. C., Weedon, G. P., Marshall, J. E. A., Tyson, R. V. & Williams, C. J. 2001. Integrated stratigraphy of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation (Upper Jurassic) based on exposures and boreholes in south Dorset, UK. Geological Magazine 138, 511–39.Google Scholar
Neaverson, E. 1924. The zonal nomenclature of the Upper Kimmeridge Clay. Geological Magazine 61, 145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neaverson, E. 1925. Ammonites from the Upper Kimmeridge Clay. Papers from the Geology Department of the University of Liverpool 1, 1–52, pls 1–4.Google Scholar
Oates, M. J. 1991. Upper Kimmeridgian stratigraphy of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 102, 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, K. N. 1992. The sequence of ammonite correlated horizons in the British Sinemurian (Lower Jurassic). Newsletters on Stratigraphy 27, 129–56.Google Scholar
Page, K. N. 1995. Biohorizons and zonules: intra-subzonal units in Jurassic ammonite stratigraphy. Palaeontology 38, 801–14.Google Scholar
Raiswell, R. & Fisher, Q. J. 2000. Mudrock-hosted carbonate concretions: a review of growth mechanisms and their influence on chemical and isotopic composition. Journal of the Geological Society, London 157, 239–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchman, I. C. 1989. Diagenesis of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, Onshore UK. Journal of the Geological Society, London 146, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1936. The Upper Jurassic invertebrate fauna of Cape Leslie, Milne Land. II. Upper Kimmeridgian and Portlandian. Meddelelser om Grønland 99 (3), 180 pp., 50 pls.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. P., Sellwood, B. W., Gallois, R. W. & Chambers, M. H. 2001. A sequence stratigraphy of the Kimmeridgian and Bolonian stages (late Jurassic): Wessex-Weald Basin, southern England. Journal of the Geological Society, London 158, 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, R. V., Wilson, R. C. L. & Downie, C. 1979. A stratified water column environmental model for the type Kimmeridge Clay. Nature 277, 377–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weedon, G. P., Coe, A. L. & Gallois, R. W. 2004. Cyclostratigraphy, orbital tuning and inferred productivity for the type Kimmeridge Clay (Late Jurassic), Southern England. Journal of the Geological Society, London 161, 655–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wignall, P. B. 1990. Benthic palaeoecology of the late Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay of England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 43, 1–74.Google Scholar
Wignall, P. B. 1991. Test of the concepts of sequence stratigraphy in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) of England and northern France. Marine and Petroleum Geology 8, 430–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J., Hesselbo, S. P., Jenkyns, H. C. & Morgans-Bell, H. S. 2001. Quartz silt in mudrocks as a key to sequence stratigraphy (Kimmeridge Clay Formation, Late Jurassic, Wessex Basin, UK). Terra Nova 13, 449–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. K. & Cox, B. M. 2001. British Upper Jurassic stratigraphy (Oxfordian to Kimmeridgian). Geological Conservation Review Series 21. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee, xiv + 266 pp.Google Scholar