Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:29:37.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Classification and Evolution of the Superfamily Lichacea (Trilobita)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. P. Tripp
R. P. Tripp
Affiliation:
68 Lauderdale Gardens, Glasgow, W. 2.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The superfamily Lichacea is here considered to include two families : the Lichidae, composed of four subfamilies and twenty-four genera, and the Lichakephalidae, comprising only one species. Reed's interpretation of the glabellar and occipital lobes in the Lichidae is considered to be correct; the definition and degree of fusion of these lobes is the main criterion of generic discrimination. Hypostomal features are of assistance in defining subfamilies. The characters of the pygidium are constant in some genera, but unstable in others. The Lichinae and Homolichinae, stratigraphically the oldest subfamilies of the Lichidae, are chiefly European in occurrence during the Ordovician period. The Tetralichinae and the Ceratarginae occur earlier in North America than in Europe. Lichakephalus occurs in Lower Tremadoc beds of Bavaria.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1957 , pp. 104 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beecher, C. E., 1895. The Larval Stages of Trilobites. Amer. Geol., xvi, 166–197.Google Scholar
Bigsby, J. J., 1825. Description of a new Species of Trilobite. Journ. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phila., iv, 365–368.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1865. Geological Survey of Canada—New species of Palaeozoic Fossils. 7 New species of Fossils from the Quebec Group, in Eastern Canada, with some others previously described, and some from other formations. 301–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerste, A. F., 1920. The Generic Relations of the American Ordovician Lichadidae. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. iv, xlix, 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürich, G., 1901. Ueber eine neue Lichas-Art aus dem Devon von Neu-Süd-Wales und über die Gattung Lichas überhaupt. Neues Jahrb., Beil.-Bd., xiv, 519–539.Google Scholar
Hawle, I., and Corda, A. J. C., 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Prague, 1–176.Google Scholar
Holub, K., 1909. Příspěvek ku poznání fauny pásma Dd1γ. (Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Bande Dd1γ des mittelböhmischen Untersilurs.) Rozpravy Čes. Akad. (Bull. int. Acad. Sci. Boh.), xvii, no. 10, 1–19.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1935. The Cambro-Ordovician Formations and Faunas of South Chosen. Palaeontology Part III. Cambrian Fauna of South Chosen. Fac. Sci. Tokyo Univ., pt. 2, 49–344.Google Scholar
Lindström, G., 1885. Förteckning på Gotlands siluriska Crustacéer. K. Vetensk. Akad. Förh. Öfvers., N:o 6, 37–99.Google Scholar
Öpik, A., 1937. Trilobiten aus Estland. Geol. Inst. Univ. Tartu, Nr. 52, 1–163.Google Scholar
Phleger, F., 1936. Lichadian Trilobites. Journ. Paleont., x, 593–615.Google Scholar
Phleger, F., 1937a. Further notes on the Lichadacea. Journ. Paleont., xi, 253–256.Google Scholar
Phleger, F., 1937b. New Lichadacea in the collections of the Museum of Practical Zoölogy. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoöl., lxxx, 415–425.Google Scholar
Phleger, F., 1937c. Species and geographic distribution of the Lichadacea. Amer. Midl. Nat., xviii, 1085–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phleger, F., 1937d. A method of generic comparison, Amer. Midl. Nat., xviii, 1093–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Přibyl, A., and Erben, H. K., 1952. Über einige neue oder wenig bekannte Acanthopyginae (Tril.) des böhmischen und des deutschen Devons. Paläont. Zeitsch., xxvi, 141–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. E., 1905. Note on the Names Amphion, Harpina and Platy-metopus. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, xix, 377–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1902. Notes on the Genus Lichas. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lviii, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1923. The Subgenera of Lichas. Geol. Mag., lx, 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnéll, G., 1942. Stratigraphical and Paleontological Remarks on the Lower Ordovician of Central and Northern Öland. Medd. fr. Lunds Geol.-Min. Inst., No. 99, 1–17.Google Scholar
Richter, R. and E., 1940. Die Saukiande-Stufe von Andalusien, eine fremde Fauna in europäischen Ober-Kambrium. Abh. senckenb. naturf. Ges., cdl, 1–88.Google Scholar
Růžička, R., 1926. Fauna vrstev Eulomových Rudního ložiska u Holoub-kova (v Ouzkém). (Faune des couches à Euloma du gisement ferrugineux près de Holoubkov (à Ouzky).) Rozpravy Čes. Akad. (Bull. int. Acad. Sci. Boh.), xxxv, no. 39, 1–26.Google Scholar
Růžička, R., 1931. Doplňky k fauně vrstev Eulomových rudního ložiska u Holoub-kova (v Ouzkém). (Supplément à la faune des couches à Euloma du gisement, métallifère près de Holoubkov (à Ouzký).) Z. Věst. Stát. Geol. Ústavu Čsl. Republiky, vii, 1–20.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W., 1864. A monograph of the British trilobites. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.], pt. i, 1–80.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K., 1955. Die Fauna der Leimitz-Schiefer (Tremadoc). Abh. senckenb. naturf. Ges., xdii, 1–74.Google Scholar
Størmer, L., 1953. The Middle Ordovician of the Oslo Region, Norway. 1. Introduction to Stratigraphy. Norsk. geol. Tidsskr., xxxi, 37–141.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H. et al. , 1954. Correlation of the Ordovician Formations of North America. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., lxv, 247–298.Google Scholar
Warburg, E., 1925. The Trilobites of the Leptaena Limestone in Dalarne. Bull. Geol. Inst. Ups., xvii, 1–446.Google Scholar
Warburg, E., 1933. On the structure of the occipital ring of the Odontopleuridae. Ark. Zool., xxv, N:o 9, 1–19.Google Scholar
Warburg, E., 1939. The Swedish Ordovician and Lower Silurian Lichidae. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., xvii, N:o 4, 1–162.Google Scholar
Weber, W. N., 1932. Trilobites of the Turkestan. Mem. Com. Geol., N.S. 178, 1–157.Google Scholar
Weber, W. N., 1948. Trilobity silurijskich otloschenij SSJR. 1. Nischnesi lurijskie trilobity. (Übers.: Trilobiten der silurischen Ablagerungen der SSSR. 1. Untersilurische Trilobiten.) Monogr. po Paleontol. SSSR, lxix, 1–113.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B., 1956. Beecher's lichid protaspis and Acanthopyge consanguinea (Trilobita), Journ. Paleont., xxx, 1200–1204.Google Scholar