Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:18:58.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—On the Application of the term Neocomian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Much confusion and difference of opinion appears to exist with regard to the classification and nomenclature of the strata which form the lower part of the Cretaceous system, and the chief element of this uncertainty and confusion is the misconception which prevails respecting the proper signification and application of the term Neocomian. The object of the present paper is to explain the continental usage of this name, and by showing its inapplicability to any of our English strata, to prepare the way for a more satisfactory grouping of our Cretaceous rocks.

For many years English geologists were content with the nomenclature employed by the earlier students of the Cretaceous system— Webster, Murchison, Mantell and Fitton. In 1864, however, the French term Neocomian was introduced by Prof. Judd, who adopted it for the Cretaceous portion of the Speeton Clay, and Sir Charles Lyell subsequently used it as a synonym for the whole Lower Cretaceous series in England as distinct from the Upper Cretaceous series or the beds lying above the Lower Greensand.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1886

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 311 note 1 Quart. Journ. GeoL Soc. vol. xxiv. p. 218.Google Scholar

page 313 note 1 Sur le Neocomien dans le Jura, Zurich, 1858, p. 63.Google Scholar

page 314 note 1 Bull. Soc. Geol. de France, ser. 2, vol. 28, p. 142.Google Scholar

page 314 note 2 For this and other information I am indebted to Dr. Ch. Barrois.

page 316 note 1 Bull. Soc. Geol. de France, 1874, p. 390.Google Scholar

page 317 note 1 Bull. Soc. Geol. de France, 2nd ser. vol. 26, p. 211.Google Scholar

page 318 note 1 See Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxiv. p. 228.Google Scholar