Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T07:59:44.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Granitization and Associated Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Malcolm MacGregor  and
Gilbert Wilson
Malcolm MacGregor
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, London.
Gilbert Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A review of the literature, and our own observations have led us to the conclusion that granitization, widely defined as the process by which solid rocks are converted to rocks of granitic character, has been an important process in the evolution of many subjacent masses of granite and allied rocks, such as granodiorite and diorite, in erogenic regions.

Granitization of pre-existing rocks seems to involve two processes: (a) Metasomatism under the influence of permeating highly energized fluids—emanations—ahead of advancing magma; and (b) Mechanical penetration by magma. During the first process metasomatic exchanges take place between the minerals of the country-rock and its pore fluid: the reactions tend towards the achievement of equilibrium under the existing physico-chemical conditions. This metasomatism is selective, and promotes the convergence, in bulk and mineral composition, of rocks which were originally different, towards a common end-product. During the early stages conditions are essentially those of thermal metamorphism, but with rising energy level and increasing magmatic contributions the final conditions are dominantly “igneous”.

The mechanical penetration of the altered rocks and their mixing with magma may follow the first process without a break. Alternatively, intrusion may occur before metasomatism is completed, or has even had appreciable effect. The mixing or intrusion stage is accompanied by reactions, which tend towards the attainment of equilibrium, under magmatic conditions, between the magma and the foreign material. In terms of bulk composition the products will be intermediate between that of the magma and that of the incorporated material.

The metasomatism trends of the various examples that we have discussed are plotted together in Text-fig. 8. The diagram brings out the convergence of the curves from the normal sedimentary field to the rhyolite-diorite line, which is itself the locus of mixtures between metasomatized products and acid parental magmas.

Granitic rocks may originate as the result of either or both these processes. That which predominates in any particular case depends on the supply of emanations and the local physico-chemical conditions. In the deeper parts of the granitic layer complete or selective fusion is to be expected, and the magmas so formed may rise and granitize the overlying rocks: firstly, by metasomatism, and at higher levels chiefly by mechanical penetration. At still higher levels, owing to loss of energy, rising magma is unable to cause extensive modification of the pre-existing rocks, and forms true intrusions.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 6 , June 1939 , pp. 193 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LIST OF REFERENCES

Adams, F. D., and Barlow, A. E., 1910. “The Geology of the Haliburton and Bancroft Areas, Ontario,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Canada, No. 6.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. H., 1937. “Granitization, Albitization, and related Phenomena in the North-Western Inyo Range of California-Nevada,” Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xlviii, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backlund, H. G., 1937. “Die Umgrenzung der Svekofenniden,” Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, xxvii, 219.Google Scholar
Backlund, H. G., 1938 a. “Zur Granitisationstheorie,” Geol. Fören. Förhandl., lx, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backlund, H. G., 1938 b. “The Problems of the Rapakiwi Granites,” Journ. Geol., xlvi, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, E. B., and Maufe, H. B., 1916. “The Geology of Ben Nevis and Glen Coe,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., No. 53.Google Scholar
Barth, Tom F. W., 1936. “Structural and Petrologic Studies in Dutchess County, New York,” part ii, Bull. Geo. Soc. Amer., xlvii, 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bemmelen, R. W. van, 1938. “On the Origin of the Pacific Magma Types in the Volcanic Inner-Arc of the Soenda Mountain System,” De Ingen. in Ned. Ind., iv, 1.Google Scholar
Blyth, F. G. H., 1935. “The Basic Intrusive Rocks of the Cambrian Inlier near Malvern,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xci, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, N. L., 1937. “Recent High Temperature Research on Silicates and its Significance in Igneous Geology,” Amer. Journ. Sci., xxxiii, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammall, A., 1933. “Syntexis and Differentiation,” Geol. Mag., LXX, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammall, A., 1936. “The Reciprocal Role of Alumina in Reaction Series,” Min. Mag., xxiv, 362.Google Scholar
Clough, C. T., Maufe, H. B., and Bailey, E. B., 1909. “The Cauldron Subsidence of Glen Coe, and associated Igneous Phenomena,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxv, 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A. J. G., 1902. “On Composite Gneisses in Boylagh, West Donegal,” Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., xxiv B, 203.Google Scholar
Cole, A. J. G., 1906. “On a Hillside in Donegal: a Glimpse into the Great Earth-Caldrons,” Sci. Progr., ii, 1.Google Scholar
Daly, R. A., 1933. Igneous Rocks and the Depths of the Earth, New York.Google Scholar
Ebert, H., 1935. “Hornfelsbildung und Anatexis im Lausitzer Massiv,” Zeits. d. Deutsch. Geol. Gesell., lxxxvii, 129.Google Scholar
Eckermann, H. von, 1936. “The Loos-Hamra Region,” Geol. Fören. Förhandl., lviii, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckermann, H. von, 1938. “The Rapakivi Facts,” Geol. Fören. Förhandl., lx, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskola, P., 1914. “On the Perology of the Orijärvi Region,” Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 40.Google Scholar
Eskola, P., 1915. “On the Relations between the Chemical and Mineralogical Composition in the Metamorphic Rocks of the Orijärvi Region,” Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 44.Google Scholar
Eskola, P., 1932. “On the Origin of Granitic Magmas,” Min. Pet. Mitt., xlii, 445.Google Scholar
Eskola, P., 1933. “On the Differential Anatexis of Rocks,” Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 103, 12.Google Scholar
Fenner, C. N., 1938. “Contact Relations between Rhyolite and Basalt on Gardiner River, Yellowstone Park,” Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xlix, 1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. M., 1921. “Die Injectionmetamorphose im Stavangergebiete,” Videns. Skrift. I. Mat.-natur. Kl., No. 10.Google Scholar
Goranson, R. W., 1932. “Some Notes on the Melting of Granite,” Amer. Journ. Sci., Ser. 5, xxiii, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grantham, D. R., 1928. “The Petrology of the Shap Granite,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxxix, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, W. A., 1935. “The Charnockite Series of Uganda,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xci, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, A., 1932. Metamorphism, London.Google Scholar
Hise, C. R. van, 1904. “A Treatise on Metamorphism,” Mon. U.S. Geol. Surv., No. 47.Google Scholar
Horwood, H. C., 1936. “Granitization in the Cross Lake Region, Manitoba,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, xxx, Sect. IV, 99.Google Scholar
Hutton, J., 1795. Theory of the Earth.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. Q., and Anderson, E. M., 1938. “Crustal Layers and the Origin of Magmas,” Bull. Volcanologique, Ser. 2, iii, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroix, A., 1898. “Le Granite des Pyrénées et ses Phénomènes de Contact,” Bull. Serv. Carte géol. France, No. 64.Google Scholar
Lacroix, A., 1900. “Le Granite des Pyrénées et ses Phénomènes de Contact,” Bull. Serv. Carte géol. France, No. 71.Google Scholar
Laitakari, A., 1921. “Uber die Petrographie und Mineralogie der Kalksteinlagerstätten von Parainen (Pargas),” Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 54.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. C., 1897–1898. “Report on the Geology of the Rainy Lake Region,” Ann. Rept. Geol. Surv. Canada (N.S.), iii, F.Google Scholar
MacGregor, M., 1938. “The Evolution of the Criffell-Dalbeattie Quartz-Diorite: A Study in Granitization,” Geol. Mag., LXXV, 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Hugh Jr., 1893. Field Notes, quoted by H. H. Read, 1925.Google Scholar
Niggli, P., 1929. Ore Deposits of Magmatic Origin. (Trans. by Boydell, H. C.), London.Google Scholar
Nockolds, S. R., 1933. “Some Theoretical Aspects of Contamination in Acid Magmas,” Journ. Geol., xli, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirke, T. T., 1929. “The Structures and Batholiths of the French River Area,” Journ. Geol., xxxvii, 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirke, T. T., and Collins, W. H., 1930. “The Disappearance of the Huronian,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Canada, No. 160.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1925. “The Geology of the Country around Golspie, Sutherlandshire,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., No. 103.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1927. “The Igneous and Metamorphic History of Cromar, Deeside, Aberdeenshire,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., lx, 338.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1931. “The Geology of Central Sutherland,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., Nos. 108–9.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. L., 1936. “Demonstrations in Petrogenesis from Kiloran Bay, Colonsay. (1) The Transfusion of Quartzite,” Min. Mag., xxiv, 367.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. L., 1937. “Contact Phenomena indicating a Tertiary Age for the Gabbros of the Slieve Gullion District,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xlviii, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, E. H. L., 1913. “The Sea-Point Granite-Slate Contact,” Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, xvi, 33.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., 1907. “Om Granit och Gneis,” Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 23.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., 1923. “On Migmatites and Associated pre-Cambrian Rocks of South-West Finland,” part i. Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 58.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., 1926. “On Migmatites and Associated pre-Cambrian Rocks of South-West Finland,”, part ii, Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 77.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., 1934. “On Migmatites and Associated pre-Cambrian Rocks of South-West Finland,”, part iii, Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 107.Google Scholar
Spencer, E., 1925. “Albite and other authogenetic minerals in limestone from Bengal,” Min. Mag., xx, 365.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. E., and Harwood, H. F., 1931. “The Dolerite-Chalk Contact of Scawt Hill, Co. Antrim, etc.,” Min. Mag., xxii, 439.Google Scholar
Ward, J. C., 1876. “On the Granitic, Granitoid, and Associated Metamorphic Rocks of the Lake District,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxii, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegmann, C. E., 1930. “Über Diaperismus,” Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, No. 92, 58.Google Scholar
Wegmann, C. E., 1936. “Zur Deutung der Migmatite,” Geol. Rundschau, xxvi, 305.Google Scholar
Wegmann, C. E., 1938. “Geological Investigations in Southern Greenland,” part i. Medd. om Grønland., Bd. 113, No. 2.Google Scholar
Wilson, G., 1938. “The Evolution of the Granodioritic Rocks of the South-Eastern End of the Kopaonik Batholith, Yugoslavia,” Geol. Mag., LXXV, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar