Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:55:31.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—Notes on the Genus Trinucleus. —Part III1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The characters of the lateral furrows of the glabella and of the pits which occur in the axial furrows of the head-shield have not had sufficient attention paid to them, and a comparative study of their development in various British species reveals some interesting and important features.

It has heen commonly assumed that lateral furrows are absent in some species, and at any rate the omission of any notice of their occurrence in certain cases is difficult to understand. Frequently, moreover, it has been stated that only two pairs are present, even in those species in which the presence of any lateral furrows has been recognized. The nature of the so-called stalk or neck of the glabella has been also generally misunderstood. Mccoy's division of the genus Trinucleus into two genera, Trinucleus, sens, restr., and Tretaspis, was largely based on the presence or absence of this stalk and of lateral furrows; for he says the furrows at the base of the glabella distinguish Tretaspis from Trinucleus, the latter being stated to be without lateral furrows, though the presence of the ‘eye-line’ on the cheek was chosen as the primary distinctive feature of the former. Nicholson and Etheridge, while rejecting Tretaspis as a sub-generic division, mention an additional third pair of furrows at the sides of the anterior swollen portion of the glabella in Trinucleus Bucklandi, though they do not seem to regard them as segmental furrows.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 349 note 2 Mccoy, Syn. Palæoz. Foss. Woodw. Mus., 1855, pp. 144–7.Google Scholar

page 349 note 3 Nicholson, & Etheridge, Mon. Silur. Foss. Girvan, fasc. ii, pp. 190–7, 1880.Google Scholar

page 349 note 4 Ruedemann, Bull 49 New York State Mus., Palæont. Papers 2, 1901, p. 41, pl. iii, figs. 11, 15–20.

page 350 note 1 Mccoy, Syn. Palæoz. Foss. Woodw. Mus., 1855, p. 146, pl. iE, fig. 16.Google Scholar

page 351 note 1 Oehlert, BullSoc. Geol. France, ser. III, vol. xxiii, p. 302, 1895.Google Scholar

page 351 note 2 Mccoy, Syn. Silur. Foss. Irel., 1846, p. 42.Google Scholar

page 352 note 1 Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv., vol. iii, p. 515, pl. xiB, fig. 4.

page 352 note 2 Hicks, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, vol. xxxi, p. 182, pl. ix, fig. 6, 1875.Google Scholar

page 352 note 3 Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv., vol. iii, p. 516, pl. xii, fig. 10.

page 353 note 1 Barrande, Syst. Silur. Bohême, vol. i, p. 621, pl. xxix, figs. 10–17.

page 353 note 2 Nicholson, & Etheridge, Mon. Silur. Foss. Girvan, fasc. ii, p. 190, pl. xiii, figs. 14, 15, 20; Reed, Girvan Trilobites, 1903, pt. i, p. 10, pl. i, fig. 11.Google Scholar

page 354 note 1 Nicholson & Etheridge, op. cit., p. 192.

page 354 note 2 Reed, op. cit., pl. i, figs. 10, 13.

page 354 note 3 Mccoy, Syn. Pal. Foss. Woodw. Mus., p. 147.

page 354 note 4 Olin, “Chasmopsk. o. Trinucleusskiffern i Skane”: Medd. fr. Lunds Geol. Fältklubb, ser. B, Nr. i, 1906, p. 66, t. iv, figs, la, b.

page 355 note 1 Reed, Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. II, p. 52, Pl. III, Figs. 2–7, 1895.

page 355 note 2 Reed, Mon. Girvan Trilob., Suppl., 1914, p. 3, pl. i, figs. 1, 2.

page 356 note 1 Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv., vol. ii, pt. i, p. 350, pl. ix, fig. 3; vol. iii, p. 517, pl. xiii, fig. 9; dec. vii, pl. vii, p. 6.

page 356 note 2 Mccoy, Syn. Pal. Foss. Woodw. Mus., p. 145, pl. iE, figs. 14, 14a.

page 357 note 1 Barrande, Syst. Silur. Bohême, i, p. 628, pl. xxx, figs. 29–40; pl. xxxv, figs. 30, 31.

page 357 note 2 Reed, Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. VII, p. 212, Pl. XVI, Figs. 1–9, 1910.

page 357 note3 Portlock, , Geol. Rep. Londond., p. 263, pl. iB, fig. 7; B. Smith, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., xxvi, B, 9, p. 127, pl. viii, figs. 3, 4, 1907.Google Scholar

page 357 note 4 Reed, Girvan Trilobites, 1903, pt. i, p. 12, pl. ii, figs. 1–6.

page 358 note 1 Murchison, Silur. Syst., pl. xxiv, fig. 3.

page 357 note 2 Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv., dec. vii, pl. vii, 1853 (the figures are largely restorations).

page 357 note 3 Ibid., p. 7.