Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:11:14.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—Homosteus, Asmuss, compared with Coccosteus, Agassiz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. H. Traquair
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The creature which forms the subject of the present communication is the same as that which was described as Asterolepis by Hugh Miller in his “Footprints of the Creator,” and consequently its remains are at present better known to British geologists and palæontologists under that name. Why, then, alter a name which we have used so long? is a question likely to be asked by those who have not critically studied the complicated mesh in which the synonymy of the name “Asterolepis” is entangled.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 1889 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1889

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 Die Thier- und Pflanzenreste den alter rothen Sandsteins und Bergkalks in Nowgorodschen Gouvernement,” Bull. Acad. Imp. St. Pétersburg, tome vii. p. 78.

page 1 note 2 Beiträge zur Geognosie und Palaeontologie Dorpats, 1835–37.

page 1 note 3 Poiss. Foss. du vieux Grès rouge, tab. xxxii.

page 2 note 1 Op. cit. tab. xxx. figs. 5, 6.

page 2 note 2 Op. cit. appendix, p. 152.

page 2 note 3 Das vollkommenste Hautskelet der bisher bekannten Thierreiche, Dorpat, 1856.

page 2 note 4 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xvi. 1859, p. 122.Google Scholar

page 3 note 1 Notes on the Nomenclature of the Fishes of the Old Red Sandstone, Geol. Mag. Dec. III. Vol. V. 1888, p. 508.Google Scholar

page 4 note 1 Dec. Geol. Survey, x. p. 30.Google Scholar

page 8 note 1 Dec. Geol. Survey, vol. x. p. 52,Google Scholar plate 5.

page 8 note 2 Catalogue British Fossils, p. 318.

page 8 note 3 On Plate I. in Fig. 2, for.p. e. read pt.e. In Fig. 3, for e.n. read e.o.