Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:35:25.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence from Recent Plankton Regarding the Biological Affinities of Tasmanites Newton 1875 and Leiosphaeridia Eisenack 1958

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

D. Wall
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Sheffield.

Abstract

Following a bricf survey of previous literature concerning microfossils of the genera Tasmanites Newton 1875 and Leiosphaeridia Eisenack 1958 (generally known as leiospheres), two present day green algae are described (Pachysphaera pelagica Ostenfeld 1899 and Halosphaera minor Ostenfeld 1899). These organisms are compared with members of the fossil genera reviewed above and on the basis of this comparison it is concluded that the biological affinities of Tasmanites and some species of Leiosphaeridia lie with the Chlorophyceae. A possible mode of life is suggested for the fossils and the systematic position of the genera Tasmanites and Leiosphaeridia is reviewed but not altered.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clarke, J. M., 1885. On Devonian spores. Amer. J. Sci., ser. 3, 29, 284289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cookson, I. C., and Manum, S., 1960. On Crassophaera, a new genus of microfossils from Mesozoic and Tertiary deposits. Nytt. Mag. Bot., 8, 1725.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. W., 1871. On spore-cases in coals. Amer. J. Sci., ser. 3, 1, 256263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J. W., 1884. On rhizocarps in the Paleozoic period. Canadian Rec. Sci., 1, 1927.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. W., 1886. On rhizocarps in the Erian (Devonian) period in America. Chicago Acad. Sci. Bull., 1, 195–118.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1938. Hystrichosphaerideen und verwandte Formen imbaltischen Silur. Z. Geschiebeforsch., 14, 130.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A, 1956. Probleme der Vermehrung und des Lebensraumes bei der Gattung Leiosphaera (Hystrichosphaeridea). N. Jb. Geol. u. Paläont., Abh., 12, 402408.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1957. Mikrofossilien in organischer Substanz aus dem Lias Schwabens (Suddeutschland). Palaeontographica, 15, 239249.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A, 1958. Tasmanites Newton und Leiosphaeridia n.g. als Gattungen der Hystrichosphaeridea. Palaeontographica, (A) 110, 119.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1962. Mitteilungen uber Leiospharen und uber das Pylom bei Hystrichospharen. N. Jb. Geol. u. Paläont. Abh., 114, 5880.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. A., and Thomas, B. W., 1884. Report of the committee on the microscopic organisms in the bowlder clays of Chicago and vicinity. Chicago Acad. Sci. Bull., 1, 3540.Google Scholar
Kräusel, R., 1941. Die Sporokarpien Dawsons, eine neue Thallophyten Klasse des Devons. Palaeontographica, (B) 86, 113135.Google Scholar
Lemmermann, E., 1903 1908. Nordisches Plankton, Botanischer Teil. XXI. Flagellatae, Chlorophyceae, Coccosphaerales und Silicoflagellatae, 1908, XXI, 8.Google Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1875. On “Tasmanite” and Australian “white coal”. Geol. Mag., 12, 337342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norem, W. L., 1955. Tytthodiscus, a new microfossil genus from the California Tertiary. J. Paleont., 29, 694695.Google Scholar
Orton, E., 1883. A source of the bituminous matter of the black Shales of Ohio. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Proc., 31st meeting, Montreal, 1882, 373384.Google Scholar
Reinsch, P. F., 1884. Micro–Palaeophytologia formationis carboniferae, II. Discieas (Sporangites), Sphaerocladiteas aliasque Plantulas Algoidicas hucusque incertae sedis in systemate, Plantulas Algis proximas, nonullaque animalcula microscopica. Theo. Krische, 138.Google Scholar
Schopf, J. M., Wilson, L. R., and Bentall, R., 1944. An annotated synopsis of paleozoic fossil spores and the definition of generic groups. Illinois State Geol. Surv., Rep. Invest. No. 91, 172.Google Scholar
Sommer, F. W., 1956. South American Paleozoic sporomorphae without haptotypic structures. Micropaleontology, 2, 175181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandel, C. F., Knudsen, M., and Ostenfeld, C., 1899. Iagttagelser over Overfladevandets Temperatur, Saltholdighed og Plankton paa islandiske og gronlandske Skibsrouteri 1898. (Plankton by Ostenfeld, C., p. 49.) Copenhagen, 1899.Google Scholar