Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T04:03:26.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dusky Apatites of the Eskdale (Cumberland) Granite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Brian Simpson
Brian Simpson
Affiliation:
University College, Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A Patite was first recorded from the Eskdale granite by R. H. Rastall and W. H. Wilcockson in 1915 (I).1 Recently, the author, in carrying out work on the granite, has noticed the peculiar character of the apatites, in that they are mostly of a dusky type occasioned by the presence of large amounts of finely-divided inclusions. Similar apatites have been recorded from the Leinster granite (2), Gault Clay, Thanet Sands, Chausey Islands (3), Jersey (4), the Old Red Sandstone of the Cardiff District (5), and the Dublin district (6), but nearly all show a sharply defined core. The Eskdale ones, although presenting a dense centre, show no clear-cut division between the core and the outer zone of the apatite. Invariably the outer zone of the apatite carries some inclusions.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 70 , Issue 8 , August 1933 , pp. 375 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1)Rastall, R. H. and Wilcockson, W. H., Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., lxxi, 1915, 607–8.Google Scholar
(2)Flett, W. F. and Smithson, F., Geol. Mag., LXV, 1928, 14–19.Google Scholar
(3)Groves, A. W. and Mourant, A. E., Min. Mag., xxii, 1929, 92–99.Google Scholar
(4)Groves, A. W., Geol. Mag., LXIV, 1927, 244–9.Google Scholar
(5)Heard, H. and Davies, R., Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., lxxx, 1924, 505.Google Scholar
(6)Smithson, F. G., Geol. Mag., LXV, 1928, 14–19.Google Scholar
(7)op. cit. 3.Google Scholar