Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:05:38.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contributions to the Geology of Cyprus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. R. Cowper Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Tertiary beds cover the greater part of the island of Cyprus and their general distribution is shown in Bellamy's map published in 1905, while their characters and relations have been described with a certain amount of detail in Bellamy and Jukes-Browne's memoir on The Geology of Cyprus (1). Since then Philippson (37) has given a useful summary of our knowledge of the geology of the island with references to the literature up to the year 1918, and Cullis and Edge (38), though principally concerned with the igneous rocks, have more recently published a revised map with a summary of the Tertiary beds. But much work is still required before an adequate knowledge of them is obtained. The division into Eocene (Lapithos beds), Kythrean (Oligocene?), Idalian (Miocene) and Pliocene + Pleistocene Series as adopted in Bellamy's memoir, is convenient for a rough local classification of the beds. But the grouping of the Pliocene with the Pleistocene was obviously done owing to insufficient knowledge, and further subdivision of the series is undoubtedly necessary. Bellamy followed Gaudry (3) in regarding the Pliocene beds of the Carpas as representing an older stage than those of the central and southern districts. Russell (2) had previously recognized a lower series in the central valley which he called the Nicosia beds containing very abundant fossils, and an upper series which he termed the Kerynia Rock, comprising a yellow calcareous sandstone which furnishes most of the building stone in the island.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , June 1930 , pp. 241 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Bellamy, C. V. and Jukes-Browne, A. J., The Geology of Cyprus, (Plymouth, 1905), pp. 15–44.Google Scholar
(2) Russell, R., “Geology of the Island of Cyprus,” Report Brit. Assoc., York meeting, 1881, Sect. C, pp. 640–2.Google Scholar
(3) Gaudry, A., “Géologie de Chypre,” Mem. Soc. Géol. France, ser. II, vii, 1862, pp. 149–314.Google Scholar
(4) Reed, F. R. C., “Contributions to the Geology of Cyprus,” Geol. Mag., Vol. LXVI, 1929, pp. 435–47.Google Scholar
(5) Krenkel, E., Geologie Afrikas, i (Berlin, 1925), pp. 52–124.Google Scholar
(6) Blanckenhorn, M., “Syrien, Arabien, Mesopotamien” (Handb. Region. Geol., Bd. v, Abt. 4, 1914), pp. 132–4.Google Scholar
(7) Koert, W., “Geol. Beob. in Syrien u. Palästina,” Zeitschr. deut. Geol. Gesell., lxxvi, 1924, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
(8) Bate, D., Geol. Mag., 1904, p. 324.Google Scholar
(9) Blanckenhorn, M., “Das marine Miocän in Syrien,” Denkschr. k.k. Akad. Wiss. Wien (Math. Natur. Kl.), Bd. lvii, 1890, pp. 591–620.Google Scholar
(10) Daus, W., “Beitr. z. Kennt. marin. Miocän in Kilikien u. Nordsyrien,” Neues Jahrb. f. Miner. u. Geol., Beil. Bd. 38, 1914, pp. 420–500.Google Scholar
(11) Schaffer, F., “Beitr. z. Kennt. Miocänbeckens von Cilicien,” Jahrb. k.k. Geol. Reichsanst., Bd. li, 1901, pp. 41–74. t. iii.Google Scholar
(11a) Schaffer, F., “Cilicia,” Petermann's Geogr. Mitt., Ergänzungsheft No. 141, 1903, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
(12) Frech, F., “Geol. Kleinasiens,” Zeitschr. deut. Geol. Gesell., Bd. lxviii, 1916, pp. 1–325.Google Scholar
(13) Bellamy, C. V., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lvi, 1900, pp. 745–58, pl. xxxix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14) Bergeat, A., “Geol. Mass. Gest. Insel Cypern,” Tschermak's Mineral. Mitteil., Bd. xii, Heft 4, 1892, pp. 263–311.Google Scholar
(14a) Simonelli, V., “Foss. Terz. e post Plioc. d. Isola di Cipro,” Mem. Accad. Scien. Instit. Bologna, ser. v, t. 3, 1893, pp. 353–62.Google Scholar
(15) Unger, F. and Kotschy, T., Die Insel Cypern (Vienna, 1865).Google Scholar
(16) Blanckenhorn, M., “Das Marine Pliocän in Syrien,” Sitzungsber. phys. med. Soc. Erlangen, Heft 24, 1891–1892, pp. 1–53, t. i, ii.Google Scholar
(17) Cayeux, , Comptes Rendus Acad. Sc. Paris, c. lii, 1911, pp. 637–9, 981–4.Google Scholar
(18) Blanckenhorn, M. and Oppenheim, P., “Neue Beitr. z. Kennt. Neogens in Syrien u. Palästina,” Geol. u. Paläont. Abhandl. N.F., Bd. xv, Heft 4, 1927, pp. 321–58, t. xxi.Google Scholar
(19) Oppenheim, P., “Neogen in Kleinasien, I,” Zeitschr. deut. Geol. Gesell., Bd. lxx, 1918, Abh. 1–4, pp. 1–210, t. i–xii.Google Scholar
(20) Toula, F., “Marin Neogen fauna aus Cilicien,” Jahrb. k.k. Geol. Reichsanst., Bd. li, Heft 2, 1901, pp. 247–64, t. viii.Google Scholar
(21) Blanckenhorn, M., Palaeontographica, Bd. xliv, 3, 1897, pp. 71–144, t. vii.Google Scholar
(22) Picard, L., “Uber die Verbreitung des Pliocäns im nördlichen Palästina,” Centralbl. f. Miner. Geol. u. Paläont., Abt. B, Jahrg. 1928, pp. 326–35.Google Scholar
(23) Fuchs, T., “Miocän Foss. aus Lykien,” Verh. k.k. Geol. Reichsanst., 1885, No. 4, pp. 107–12.Google Scholar
(24) Blanckenhorn, M., “Neues z. Geol. u. Paläont. Aegyptens, IV: Das Pliocän,” Zeitschr. deut. Geol. Gesell., Bd. liii, 1901, pp. 305–502, t. xiv and xv.Google Scholar
(25) Blanckenhorn, M., “Neues z. Geol. Palästina, etc.,” Zeitschr. deut. Geol. Gesell., Bd. lxii, 1910, pp. 405–61, t. v.Google Scholar
(26) Blanckenhorn, M., “Neues zur Geol. u. Paläont. Aegyptens, III: Das Miocän,” Zeitschr. deut. Geol. Gesell., Bd. liii, 1901, pp. 52–132, t. ii and iii.Google Scholar
(27) Picard, L., “Geol. Kischon Ebene,” Zeitschr. deut. Ver. z. Erforsch. Palästinas, li, 1928, pp. 5–72, t. 1–6.Google Scholar
(28) Tietze, E., “Beitr. z. Geol. Lykien.,” Jahrb. k.k. Geol. Reichsanst., Bd. xxxv, 1885, pp. 282–386.Google Scholar
(29) Cullis, C. G., “A Sketch of the Geology and Mineral Resources of Cyprus,” Journ. R. Soc. Arts, vol. lxxii, 1924, pp. 624–47.Google Scholar
(30) Gregory, J. W. and others, “Contributions to the Geology of Cyrenaica,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxvii, 1911, pp. 572–680, pls. xlii–ix.Google Scholar
(31) Ficheur, E., “Terr. néog. Sahel d' Alger,” Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. III, vol. xxiv, 1897, pp. 973–81.Google Scholar
(32) Lamothe, De and Dautzenberg, P., “Gîtes foss. marnes Plaisanciens du Sahel d' Alger,” Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. III, vol. vii, 1907, pp. 481–506.Google Scholar
(33) Gregory, J. W., Rift Valleys and Geology of East Africa, London, 1921, p. 75; R. B. Newton, Appendix II, pp. 383, 384.Google Scholar
(34) Newton, R. B., Geol. Mag., 1900, pp. 500–14, 544–60, pls. xx–ii.Google Scholar
(35) De Stefani, C., “Les Terrains Superieurs du Basin de la Mediterranée,” Ann. Soc. Géol. Belgique, xviii, 1892, mem. pp. 201–403.Google Scholar
(36) Kober, L., “Geol. Forsch. in Vorderasien, I,” Denkschr. k.k. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math. Nat. Kl., Bd. xci, 1915, pp. 379–427, t. i–iii, and references.Google Scholar
(37) Philippson, A., “Kleinasien” (Handb. Reg. Geol., Bd. v, Abt. 2, 1918), pp. 137–9 and references.Google Scholar
(38) Cullis, C. G. and Edge, A. B., Report on the Cupriferous Deposits of Cyprus (Colonial Office Report, 1922), pp. 3–6, with map.Google Scholar
(39) Blanckenhorn, M., “Aegypten” (Handb. Reg. Geol., Bd. vii, Abt. 9, 1921), pp. 130–42, and references.Google Scholar
(40) Gignoux, M., “Les Formations marines Pliocènes et Quaternaires de l' Italie du Sud et de la Sicile,” Ann. Univ. Lyon, n.s., Scien. Med., Fasc. 36, 1913.Google Scholar