Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:13:04.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

B. B. Bohren ,
W. G. Hill  and
A. Robertson
B. B. Bohren
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh 9
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh 9
A. Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh 9

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The pattern of changes of the genetic covariance between two characters on selection was examined in an effort to explain the asymmetry of correlated responses in two traits, or of the same trait in two environments, frequently observed in experimental results.

The algebraic conclusions were further examined by model selection experiments using a computer. The computer was programmed to calculate the change in gene frequency from generation to generation and to calculate from it the expected changes in genetic variances and covariance as selection proceeded. This procedure was carried out with several models of gene effects and gene frequencies.

Asymmetry of the genetic covariance, and consequently of the correlated responses, resulted when the relative change in gene frequency at the loci contributing positively and negatively to the covariance depended on the trait selected. The conditions necessary for the development of asymmetry were examined and the results suggest that any symmetry found in an experiment is perhaps more surprising than asymmetry. Probably the most frequent contribution to asymmetry in practice will be from loci contributing negatively to the covariance and having frequencies other than 0·5.

Accurate prediction of correlated response over many generations is therefore not possible without prior knowledge of the composition of the genetic covariance, as well as its magnitude. The validity of existing theory for the prediction of correlated responses is likely to be much poorer than for the prediction of direct responses. Predictions would then have to be based on the genetic parameters estimated in each generation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 44 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Bell, A. E. & McNary, H. W. (1963). Genetic correlation and asymmetry of the correlated response from selection for increased bodyweight of Tribolium in two environments. Proc. XI Int. Congr. Genet., p. 256.Google Scholar
Clayton, G. A., Knight, G. R., Morris, J. A. & Robertson, A. (1957). An experimental check on quantitative genetic theory. III. Correlated responses. J. Genet., 55, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960 a). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, ix + 365 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960 b). Selection of mice for growth on high and low planes of nutrition. Genet. Res. 1, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friars, G. W., Bohren, B. B. & McKean, H. E. (1962). Time trends in estimates of genetic parameters in a population of chickens subjected to multiple objective selection. Poult. Sci. 41, 1773–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grtffing, B. (1960). Theoretical consequences of truncation selection based on individual phenotype. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 13, 307–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1950). Population Genetics and Animal Improvement, 342 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noedskog, A. W. & Festing, M. (1962). Selection and correlated responses in the fowl. Proc. XII Worlds Poultry Congr., Section papers, pp. 25–29.Google Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. & Robertson, F. W. (1953). Studies in quantitative inheritance. H. An analysis of a strain of Drosophila melanogaster selected for long wings. J. Genet. 51, 276–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, P. B. (1962). A double selection experiment for body weight and breast angle at eight weeks of age in chickens. Genetics, 47, 1313–1319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamada, Yukio & Bell, A. E. (1963). Selection for 13-day larval growth in Tribolium under two nutritional levels. Proc. XI Int. Congr. Genet., p. 256.Google Scholar