Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:22:23.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexual dimorphism in mouse gametogenesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

B. M. Slizynski
B. M. Slizynski
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Diplotene and diakinesis chiasma frequency in oöcytes of the mouse cannot be studied successfully with the present technique. Metaphase chiasmata have been examined in thirty-nine oöcytes. It is deduced that the total diplotene map length in females is about 2300 cM. compared with 1950 cM. in males. There is sexual dimorphism in the frequency of chiasmata, which is paralleled by similar dimorphism in frequencies of crossing-over, measured genetically.

The two sexes differ in the duration of various stages of meiosis. In adult males the pachytene stage, lasting for about 7 days, is directly followed by diplotene and diakinesis, after which the metaphase stage sets in. The sex bivalent in males develops visible chiasmata much earlier than do the autosomes and it precedes them in anaphase separation. Quick terminalization of chiasmata in it leads in a fair proportion of cases to precocious separation and in less than 1% of cases to cytologically detectable non-disjunction of sex chromosomes.

In females the pachytene stage appears in oöcytes of the embryo and is followed by the dictyotene stage, which last still ovulation, i.e. between 35–40 days and several months. Since in the oöcyte chiasmata are formed and move during the dictyotene stage, it follows that stainable materials of the chromosomes are not necessary for the formation and movement of chiasmata and are concomitant with pairing and anaphase separation. It follows also that the time for chiasma formation and movement is in females at least five to six times longer than in males. In old oöcytes in which time is available for maximum terminalization of chiasmata, non-disjunction may appear with detectable frequency. This mechanism may also operate in cases of Mongolism in man, where non-disjunction of an autosome has been recently cytologically established and higher frequency of incidence of the condition for old mothers has been known for some time.

It is possible that the differences in duration of various stages of gametogenesis are connected with the period at which gametic selection is operating: in spermatogenesis after the second meiotic division, in oögenesis prior to first meiotic metaphase.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 1960 , pp. 477 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

References

REFERENCES

Callan, H. G. (1949). As quoted by White.Google Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1954). A search for chromatid interference in the male mouse. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre, 86, 210–223.Google Scholar
Crew, F. A. E. & Koller, P. C. (1932). The sex incidence of chiasma frequency and genetical crossing-over in the mouse. J. Genet. 26, 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenin, H. A. (1948). Les heterochromosomes dans l'ovogenese des Mammiferes. J. Genet. 49, 23–37.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1922). Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huskins, C. L. & Hearne, W. M. (1936). Spermatocyte chiasma frequency in strains of mice differing in susceptibility or resistance to the spontaneous occurrence of malignant tumours. Canad. J. Res. 14, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, K. (1936). The determination of position of crossing-over. I. J. Genet. 33, 207–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakberg, E. T. (1956). A description of spermiogenesis in the mouse and its use in analysis of the cycle of seminiferous epithelium and germ cell renewal. Amer. J. Anat. 99, 391–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oksala, T. (1958). Chromosome pairing, crossing-over and segregation in meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 23, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, J. & Redfield, H. (1951). Interchromosomal effects on crossing-over in Drosophila. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 16, 175–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slizynski, B. M. (1955). Chiasmata in male mice. J. Genet. 53, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. D. (1959). Telomeres and terminal chiasmata. A reinterpretation. Univ. Tex. Publ. No. 5914, 107–111.Google Scholar