Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:28:38.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection using assortative mating in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Glenorchy McBride  and
Alan Robertson
Glenorchy McBride
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, 9
Alan Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effectiveness of the assortative mating of selected individuals in increasing selection response was tested, using abdominal chaeta score in Drosophila melanogaster. Three paired comparisons were made. In two sets of lines with 10 matings per line, individual score was used for selection and as the basis for the assortative mating. In the third set with 20 matings per line an index of individual and family score, designed to maximize rate of response, was used.

The intensity of selection was one in ten in all lines. Flies were raised in vials and individual pedigrees were kept.

In all comparisons, assortative mating gave a greater selection response, this being partly due to a greater realized heritability and partly to a greater selection differential. The effect of the assortative mating was largest in the index selected lines. With random mating, the effectiveness of the index selection itself when compared to individual selection was in accordance with theory.

In two comparisons, assortative mating increased the rate of inbreeding. The highest rate of inbreeding was observed with index selection and assortative mating, even though there were here twice as many matings as in the individually selected lines.

In the individual selection lines, the effective population size was 7·4 pairs of parents, compared to the actual value of 10 and in the index lines 7·0 compared to 20. In the former, only one-half of the matings in the initial generations made any permanent contributions to the line and in the index lines only one-third. Within generations and lines, there was a significant positive correlation between the mean score of a family and its inbreeding coefficient.

It is suggested that assortative mating is a method of increasing selection response in some situations. Its particular characteristic is that it becomes more powerful when the heritability is high whereas all of the other environmental aids to individual selection are more effective when the heritability is low.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , November 1963 , pp. 356 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

REFERENCES

Breese, E. L. (1956). The genetical consequences of assortative mating. Heredity, 10, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, G. A., Morris, J. A. & Robertson, A. (1957). An experimental check on quantitative genetic theory. I. Short-term responses to selection. J. Genet. 55, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, E. R. & Lerner, I. M. (1947). The optimum structure of breeding flocks. II. Methods of determination. Genetics, 32, 567–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emik, L. O. & Terrill, C. E. (1949). Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 40, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, J. W. (1962). The spread of genes in populations under selection. Proc. World's Poult. Congr. 12, 14–16.Google Scholar
James, J. W. & McBride, G. (1958). The spread of genes by natural and artificial selection in a closed poultry flock. J. Genet. 56, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1948). Family merit and individual merit as bases for selection. Amer. Nat. 81, 241–261, 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, F. H. W. (1954). Selection for economic characters in Australian Merino sheep. IV. The effect of inbreeding. Aust. J. agric. Res. 5, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. (1953). Studies in quantitative inheritance. III. Heritability and genetic correlation in progeny tests using different mating systems. J. Genet. 51, 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, E. G. R. (1961). A note on non-random mating in progeny tests. Genet. Res. 2, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 153, 234–249.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1961). Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genet. Res. 2, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. III. Assortative mating based on somatic resemblance. Genetics, 6, 144–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed