Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:29:16.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection on reaction norms, genetic correlations and constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Peter H. Van Tienderen  and
Hans P. Koelewijn
Peter H. Van Tienderen*
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Terrestrial Ecology, P.O. Box 40, 6666 ZG Heteren, The Netherlands Department of Genetics, Agricultural University, Wageningen
Hans P. Koelewijn
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Limnology, Nieuwersluis
*
* E-mail: [email protected] Fax: + 31.8306.23227.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two approaches to the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in heterogeneous environments have recently been put forward. The first focuses on selection on the character expression within each environment; plasticity is seen as a by-product of local selection in various habitats. The second approach focuses on selection on the parameters of the response function of genotypes, and selection is thought to change the frequencies of ‘plasticity’ genes that affect the function. This paper discusses the relationship between the two approaches, with emphasis on applications. A method is described that allows switching from one approach to the other. It is argued that character state and reaction norm approaches, while to a large extent interchangeable, usually differ in the response function chosen. This choice, however, may strongly affect the biological interpretation. The methods outlined in this paper permit one to look at the data from different perspectives in order to avoid this danger.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 115 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Antonovics, J. & Van Tienderen, P. H. (1991). Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6, 166–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. (1987). Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genetical Research 49, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B. (1990). Optimization models, quantitative genetics, and mutation. Evolution 44, 520–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. G. (1987). Genetic correlation: the quantitative genetics of evolutionary constraints. In Genetic Constraints on Adaptive Evolution (ed. Loeschcke, V.), pp. 25–45. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, G. (1990 a). Quantitative genetics of reaction norms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 3, 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, G. (1990 b). Genotype-by-environment interaction and the genetic covariances between environments: multilocus genetics. Genetica 81, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, G. (1994 a). The fitness of fitness concepts and the description of natural selection. The Quarterly Review of Biology 69, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, G. (1994 b). Phenotypic plasticity as a product of selection in a variable environment. American Naturalist (in the Press).Google Scholar
De Jong, G. & Van Noordwijk, A. J. (1992). Acquisition and allocation of resources: genetic (co)variances, selection and life-histories. American Naturalist 139, 749–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. (1986). Natural selection in the wild. Monographs in Population Biology, Vol. 21. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1952). The problem of environment and selection. American Naturalist 86, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fry, J. D. (1992). The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution 46, 540–550.Google ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. (1986). An approach to modeling the evolution of populations with consideration of genotype-environment interaction. Soviet Genetics 22, 28–36.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. & Scheiner, S. M. (1993 a). The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. V. Evolution of reaction norm shape. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 6, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S. & Scheiner, S. M. (1993 b). The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VI. Theoretical predictions for directional selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 6, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomulkiewicz, R. & Kirkpatrick, M. (1992). Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolution 46, 390–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, J. F. & Hill, W. G. (1981). Modification of estimation of parameters in the construction of genetic selection indices (‘bending’). Biometrics 37, 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G. & Thompson, R. (1978). Probabilities of nonpositive definite between-group or genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 34, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, D. (1991). Genetic covariance of fitness correlates: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45, 630–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, M. & Heckman, N. (1989). A quantitative Selection on reaction norms 125 genetic model for growth, shape and other infinitedimensional characters. Journal of Mathematical Biology 27, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M., Lofsvold, D. & Bulmer, M. (1990). Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 124, 979–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, M. & Lofsvold, D. (1992). Measuring selection and constraint in the evolution of growth. Evolution 46, 954–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402–416.Google ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. (1983). The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenski, R. E. (1988 a). Environmental studies of pleiotropy and epistasis in Escherichia coli. I. Variation in competitive fitness among mutants resistant to virus T4. Evolution 42, 425–432.Google Scholar
Lenski, R. E. (1988 b). Environmental studies of pleiotropy and epistasis in Escherichia coli. II. Compensation for maladaptive effects associated with resistance to virus T4. Evolution 42, 433–440.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard, Burian, R., Kaufman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D. & Wolpert, L. (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. The Quarterly Review of Biology 60, 265–287.Google Scholar
Rausher, M. D. (1992). The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46, 616–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheiner, S. M. (1993 a). Plasticity as a selectable trait: reply to Via. American Naturalist 142, 371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, S. M. (1993 b). Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and systematics 24, 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, C. D. & Pigliucci, M. (1993). Control of phenotypic plasticity via regulatory genes. American Naturalist 142, 366–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, R. G. (1987). Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution 41, 812–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stearns, S. C. (1992). The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turelli, M. & Barton, N. H. (1990). Dynamics of polygenic characters under selection. Theoretical Population Biology 38, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Noordwijk, A. J. & De Jong, G. (1986). Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. American Naturalist 128, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Tienderen, P. H. (1991). Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45, 1317–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Tienderen, P. H. & De Jong, G. (1994). A general model for the relation between phenotypic selection and genetic response. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Via, S. (1987). Genetic constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. In Genetic Constraints on Adaptive Evolution (ed. Loeschcke, V.), pp. 47–71. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Via, S. (1993 a). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by-product of selection in a variable environment? American Naturalist 142, 352–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Via, S. (1993 b). Regulatory genes and reaction norms. American Naturalist 142, 374–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Via, S. & Lande, R. (1985). Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39, 505–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Via, S. & Lande, R. (1987). Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially heterogeneous environment: effects of genotype-environment interaction. Genetical Research 49, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltereck, R. (1909). Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft 19, 110–172.Google Scholar