Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T03:00:56.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection for oviposition preference in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Stephen R. Bird  and
Robert Semeonoff
Stephen R. Bird
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
Robert Semeonoff
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Populations of Drosophila melanogaster were subjected to selection for differing oviposition preference under allopatric and sympatric conditions. Flies were presented with the choice of a potato-based medium and a medium containing sugar and killed yeast on which to lay their eggs. Some gene flow was possible under sympatric conditions. In the allopatric lines selection was successful in rapidly generating an increased preference for sugar, and in the sympatric lines divergent oviposition preferences were generated in two cases out of four. A significant degree of reproductive isolation between one pair of allopatric lines was generated after eighteen months of selection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , December 1986 , pp. 151 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

Barker, J. S. F. & Cummins, L. J.(1969). Disruptive selection for sternopleural bristle number in D. melanogaster. Genetics 61, 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, N. H. & Charlesworth, B. (1984). Genetic revolutions, founder effects and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15, 133–164.Google Scholar
Bigelow, R. S. (1965). Hybrid zones and reproductive isolation. Evolution 19, 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, S. R. (1984). Selection for oviposition site preference in Drosophila melanogaster. Thesis presented to the University of Leicester, England, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Bird, S. R. & Semeonoff, R. (1982). Electrophoretic analysis of many enzyme loci from a single fly homogenate. Drosophila Information Service 58, 153.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. (1985). Genetic variation in recombination in Drosphila. I. Responses to selection and preliminary genetic analysis. Heredity 54, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrman, L. & Petit, C. (1968). Genetic frequency and mating success in the Willistoni species group of Drosophila. Evolution 22, 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutteman, S. I., Wood, T. K. & Karlin, A. A. (1981). Genetic differentiation among host plant lines in sympatric Enchenopa binotata (Hymenoptera: Membracoidea). Evolution 35, 205–217.Google Scholar
Hanson, W. D. (1966). Effects of partial isolation (distance), migration, and different fitness requirements among environmental pockets upon steady state gene frequencies. Biometrics 22, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, A. A. (1983). Rhythmicity of mating activity in ‘Dark’ and ‘Light’ strains of D. melanogaster. Drosophila Information Service 59, 50–51.Google Scholar
Henderson, N. R. & Lambert, D. M. (1982). No significant deviation from random mating of worldwide populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 300, 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, L. E. & Eisenberg, R. M. (1975). Geotactic responses and the evolution of sexual isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of House Fly. American Naturalist 119, 784–802.Google Scholar
Jaenike, J. (1982). Environmental modification of oviposition behaviour in Drosophila. American Naturalist 119, 784–802.Google Scholar
Jaenike, J. (1983). Induction of host preference in Drosophila melanogaster. Oecologica 58, 320–325.Google Scholar
Kilias, G., Alahiotis, S. N. & Pelecanos, M. (1980). A mutifactorial genetic investigation of speciation theory using Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 34, 730–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard (1966). Sympatric speciation. American Naturalist 100, 637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1947). Ecological factors in evolution. Evolution 1, 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Smith, G. J. C. & Soans, A. B. (1967). A population model of sympatric speciation. American Naturalist 101, 493–504.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G (1978). Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Soans, A. B., Pimentel, D. & Soans, J. (1974). Evolution and speciation in allopatric and sympatric populations. American Naturalist 108, 117–124.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Tompkins, L. (1984). Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila. Behaviour Genetics 14, 411–440.Google Scholar