Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:01:21.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rate of genetic divergence of sublines in the C57BL strain of mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Manjit Singh Grewal
Manjit Singh Grewal
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Experimental Genetics Research Unit, University College London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ancestory of Koller's subline of the C57BL strain is not known. A study of the minor skeletal variants in this subHne showed that it differs from the other ten sublines of C57BL more than they difier from each other. It appears to have separated from. the rest before the genotypes of the sublines had been fixed by inbreeding. There is enough evidence to show that it is indeed a branch of C57BL strain.

The rate of divergence of the sublines of C57BL is surprisingly high. It is reconsidered whether the whole of this divergence can be explained by recent mutations or whether residual heterozygosis has also played a part in it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1962 , pp. 226 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, D. W. (1959). Rates of subline divergence in highly inbred strains of mice. J. Hered. 50, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J. R., Grüneberg, H. & Russell, E. S. (1957). Genetical differentiation involving morphological characters in an inbred strain of mice. II. American branches of the C57BL and C57BR strains. J. Morph. 100, 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S. (1955). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XIV. Minor variations of the skull. J. Genet. 53, 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S., Grüneberg, H., Searle, A. G. & Truslove, G. M. (1957). Genetical differentiation involving morphological characters in an inbred strain of mice. I. A British branch of the C57BL strain. J. Morph. 100, 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S., Grüneberg, H., Searle, A. G. & Truslove, G. M. (1960). How pure are our inbred strains of mice? Genet. Res., Camb. 1, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S. & Truslove, G. M. (1957). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XX. Maternal physiology and variation in the skeleton of C57BL mice. J. Genet. 55, 288–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, E. L. (1953). A skeletal difference between sublines of C3H strain of mice. Science, 117, 81–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüneberg, H. (1950). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. I. Minor variations of the vertebral column. J. Genet. 50, 112–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüneberg, H. (1952). Genetical studies on the skeleton of themouse. IV. Quasi-continuous variations. J. Genet. 51, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1954). Variation within an inbred strain of mice. Nature, Lond. 173, 674–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1955). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XV. Relations between major and minor variants. J. Genet. 53, 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamer, D. (1955). Biochemical variations in inbred mice. Nature, Lond. 175, 1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayman, B. I. & Mather, K. (1953). The progress of in breeding when homozygotes are at a disadvantage. Heredity, 7, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, A. & Michie, D. (1954). Factors affecting vertebral variation in mice. I. Variation within an inbred strain. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 2, 149–160.Google Scholar
McLaren, A. & Michie, D. (1955). Factors affecting vertebral variation in mice. II. Further evidence of intrastrain variation. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 3, 366–375.Google Scholar
Mather, K. (1956). Polygenic mutation and variation in populations. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 145, 293–297.Google ScholarPubMed
Reeve, E. C. R. & Gower, J. C. (1960). The effects of in breeding when selection acts against homozygosis at one or more loci. Biometrical Genetics (ed. Oscar, Kempthorne), pp. 24–34. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Russell, W. L. & Russell, L. B. (1959). Radiation-induced genetic damage in mice. In ‘Progress in Nuclear Energy Series VI’, vol. 2—Biological Sciences, pp. 179–188. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1954 a). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. IX. Causes of skeletal variation within pure lines. J. Genet. 52, 68–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1954 b). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. X. Rare variations in the A and C57BL pure lines. J. Genet. 52, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1954 c). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XI. The influence of diet on variation within pure lines. J. Genet. 52, 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truslove, G. M. (1952). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. V. ‘Interfrontal’ and ‘parted frontak’. J. Genet. 51, 115–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truslove, G. M. (1954). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XIII. Variations in the presphenoid. J. Genet. 52, 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truslove, G. M. (1961). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XXX. A search for correlations between some minor variants. Genet. Res., Camb. 2, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar