Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:01:28.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny. III. Ontogenetic changes in correlation structure among live-body traits in randombred mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

James M. Cheverud  and
Larry J. Leamy
James M. Cheverud
Affiliation:
Departments of Anthropology, Cell Biology & Anatomy and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60201, USA
Larry J. Leamy
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, California State University, Long Beach, California, 90840, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ontogenetic series of phenotypic, additive genetic, maternal and environmental correlation matrices are presented and interpreted in the light of recent models for the Ontogenetic origin and variation in correlation between traits. A total of 432 mice from 108 full-sib families raised in a cross-fostering design were used to estimate the various components of phenotypic correlation for five live-body traits at eight ages. The level of genetic and phenotypic correlation decreased with age, while levels of maternal and environmental correlation remained more or less constant. Genetic correlations probably decreased due to compensatory growth. Phenotypic correlations decreased primarily due to the relative decrease in importance of highly correlated maternal effects and consequent increase in poorly correlated environmental effects as portions of phenotypic variation. The effect of compensatory growth on genetic correlation was also responsible for a portion of the decline in phenotypic correlation. Phenotypic correlation patterns remained constant over the ages studied here. It also seems likely the genetic, maternal and environmental correlation patterns do not change with age for the characters analysed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , December 1985 , pp. 325 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Alberch, P. & Alberch, J. (1981). Heterochronic mechanism of morphological diversification and evolutionary change in the neotropical salamander, Bolitoglossa occidentalis. Journal of Morphology 167, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atchley, W. (1984). Ontogeny, timing of development, and genetic variance-covariance structure. American Naturalist 123, 519–540.Google Scholar
Atchley, W. & Rutledge, J. (1980). Genetic components of size and shape. I. Dynamics of components of phenotypic variability and covariability during ontogeny in the laboratory rat. Evolution 34, 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atchley, W., Plummer, A. & Riska, B. (1985 a). Genetics of mandible size and shape in the mouse. Genetics (In the Press).Google ScholarPubMed
Atchley, W., Plummer, A. & Riska, B. (1985 b). A genetic analysis of size scaling patterns in the mouse mandible. Genetics (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atchley, W., Riska, B., Kohn, L., Plummer, A. & Rutledge, J. (1984). A quantitative genetic analysis of brain-body size associations, their origin and ontogeny: data from mice. Evolution 38, 1165–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackith, R. & Reyment, R. (1971). Multivariate Morphometrics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bonner, J. (1982). Evolution and Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheverud, J. (1984 a). Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheverud, J. (1984 b). Evolution by kin selection: a quantitative genetic model illustrated by maternal performance in mice. Evolution 38, 766–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheverud, J., Leamy, L., Atchley, W. & Rutledge, J. (1983 b). Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny. I. Ontogenetic changes in quantitative genetic variance components in randombred mice. Genetical Research, Cambridge 42, 65–75.Google Scholar
Cheverud, J., Rutledge, J. & Atchley, W. (1983 a). Quantitative genetics of development: genetic correlations among age-specific trait values and the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 37, 895–905.Google Scholar
Constanzo, C., Hubert, L. & Golledge, R. (1983). A higher moment for spatial statistics. Geographical Analysis 15, 347–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, M. (1985). Nonparametric inference procedures for multistate life table analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 11, 245–263.Google Scholar
Fong, D. (1985). A quantitative genetic analysis of regressive evolution in the amphipod Gammarus minus Say. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B., Holder, N. & Wylie, C. (1983). Development and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. (1980). Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. & Hill, W. (1981). Modification of estimates of parameters in the construction of genetic selection incides (‘bending’). Biometrics 37, 483–493.Google Scholar
Helwig, J. & Council, K. (1979). SAS User's Guide. Raleigh: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Hill, W. & Thompson, R. (1978). Probabilities of non-positive definite between group or genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 34, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubert, L. & Schultz, J. (1976). Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 29, 190–241.Google Scholar
Klein, T., DeFries, J. & Finkbeiner, C. (1973). Heritability and genetic correlation: standard errors of estimates and sample size. Behavior Genetics 3, 355–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402–416.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1982). A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63, 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamy, L. & Cheverud, J. (1984). Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny. II. Genetic and environmental correlations among age-specific characters in randombred house mice. Growth 48, 339–353.Google Scholar
Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27, 209–220.Google Scholar
Monteiro, L. & Falconer, D. (1966). Compensatory growth and sexual maturity in mice. Animal Production 8, 179–182.Google Scholar
Oster, G. & Alberch, P. (1982). Evolution and bifurcation of developmental programs. Evolution 36, 444–459.Google Scholar
Riska, B. & Atchley, W. (1985). Genetics and growth predict patterns of brain size evolution. Science 229, 668–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riska, B., Atchley, W. & Rutledge, J. (1984). A genetic analysis of targeted growth in mice. Genetics 107, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, G. (1985). On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidence for a nonrandom organization of quantitative character variation. Journal of Mathematical Biology 21, 77–95.Google Scholar