Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:21:44.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative genetic analysis in Phalaris tuberosa III. Maternal effects on seedling growth and development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

B. D. H. Latter
B. D. H. Latter
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The genetic basis of variation in rate of seedling growth, and development has been examined in the Australian commercial population of Phalaris tuberosa. A model of additive genetic maternal effects has been used, with seed weight of the female parent as an index of maternal ability. Rate of leaf appearance, rate of tillering and growth per tiller are all genetically variable in the population, with estimated heritabilities of 0·36, 0·23 and 0·34 respectively on an individual seedling basis. Total seedling growth has a lower heritability (0·17), due to a negative genetic correlation between tiller production and growth per tiller ( − 0·46). These two components have also been shown to be subject to qualitatively different seed size maternal effects. Genetic differences in seed size in the female parent have been found to influence growth per tiller, while environmental differences in seed size affect primarily the rates of leaf appearance and tiller production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , December 1971 , pp. 245 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Bingham, J. (1966). Paternal effect on grain size in wheat. Nature 209, 940–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. P. & Edwards, K. J. R. (1961). The genetic control of leaf development in Lolium. 1. Assessment of genetic variation. Heredity 16, 63–82.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. (1947). Composition of hog carcasses as influenced by heritable differences in rate and economy of gain. Research Bulletin of the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station 354, 492–524.Google Scholar
Edwards, K. J. R. (1970). Developmental genetics of leaf formation in Lolium. 3. Inheritance of a developmental complex. Genetical Research, Cambridge 16, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, K. J. R. & Emara, Y. A. (1969). Variation in plant development within a population of Lolium multiflorum. Heredity 25, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. T., Wardlaw, I. F. & Williams, C. N. (1964). Environmental control of growth. In Grasses and Grasslands (ed. Barnard, C.), pp. 102–125. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1965 a). Quantitative genetic analysis in Phalaris tuberosa. I. The statistical theory of open-pollinated progenies. Genetical Research, Cambridge 6, 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latter, B. D. H. (1965 b). Quantitative genetic analysis in Phalaris tuberosa. II. Assortative mating and maternal effects in the inheritance of date of ear emergence, seed weight and seedling growth rate. Genetical Research, Cambridge 6, 371–386.Google Scholar
McWilliam, J. R. & Latter, B. D. H. (1970). Quantitative genetic analysis in Phalaris and its breeding implications. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 40, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed